Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i got a 33 turbo on my 32 with rb20det, external gate, screamer, fmic and exhaust,

running 1 bar atm and it seems to be fine, any less and its a slug, i was thinking about changing the springs to run 17ps (1.15bar)

ive run this much with my avcr and it seems fine, any experiences with this much boost?

I had mine at around 19 psi for a few months knowing it wasnt to good runs at 12 now and still hasnt blown

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

just run it till it blows.

i have r33 stock turbo on rb25 14psi but then i dont really mind if the turbo goes.

been drift days limiter bashing 3rd.

holds up fine soo far also when it does get driven around the place it doesnt exactly have it easy.

been like it for over a year no signs of it going.... wanted an excuse to upgrade but hasnt given up yet.

Pray when it lets go that it does not kill your motor...

Two Vic people have had motor's die from the turbine wheel letting go, and then the comp wheel shattering as a result and ending up going through the cooler and destroying pistons...

Plenty of people however have killed turbos, no engine deaths... so its not as common as the RB26 issues with turbo failurs

But then if you can afford the rebuild who cares? :banana:

If you can't however - you should really assess the risk.

what part of the turbo fails from running high boost on the stock ceramic wheeled turbos?

i've been pushing 1 bar through the stock rb20 turbo for a good 50000ks might turn it up to 1.1-1.15 after reading this thread :banana:

You answered your own question turbine = ceramic. That's the failure point.

I wasn't being a hero, I used to have a 180 with a RB20DET with a R33 S1 strapped to it, ran 1 bar for around 6 months, guess what? the turbo died, spat out oil so I bought another one, strap it on, ran it at 1 bar and sold the car, still going hard till now

really depends how worn the turbo is in the first place.

I wasn't being rude, you just posted up an ignorant question without searching anything.. it's like SAU is turning into NS...

btw, that wasn't my old car, it's actually just a 180SX with RB20DET in it.

You should be posting up how many k's each turbo has done. Nissan used Silicone Nitride in it's turbines which has no worries with strength under 'hi-temp' conditions regardless of hearsay... unless your talking over 1500* The main problem is age.

I believe silicon nitride does not like thermal shock, they have a lifespan in such conditions and to think otherwise may cost you a re-build. I think Nissans stated period of renewal 60,000k's? Unsure. How many k's your stock turbo's have done? i Wonder...

tick tick tick.

As for shaft speed. Obviously the greater capacity an engine the greater the shaft RPM needed to produce the same boost

(Keeping all other variables constant between engines, turbo, intercooler etc etc)

We have a tuner over here in perth that recommends less boost and MORE TIMING on RB engines.

Thats all you need to make power according to this so called expert.

Apart from that this thread is actually a good read.

Some people take things way to seriously

Edited by nismor32gtst

I had my skyline for about 3 years, RB20 with s2 r33 turbo. I ran 0.9 bar on it a few times, but usually 0.8 and it made 173rwkw). Didn't know the history of the turbo before that.

I dont know the true failure mode, but I 'presume' that the rear wheel died first, and then put the compressor wheel into the housing (only took one chip out of the compressor wheel though, I still have it sitting on my desk). Turned at an intersection and it let go in 1st gear at about 4500rpm or so, as it was building boost. (was running 0.8bar), with EBC.

The motor was fine, didn't find any bits of plastic in the cooler pipes. Replaced the turbo with a s1 r33 turbo, noticed a little more lag.

I guess the point is, the r33 turbo can die, and when and how it happens can be random and be different from car to car.

Fixxxer

my mate had a s2 r33 turbo running the 20 actuator on it for boost to come on quicker coz of the spring rate compared to the 7psi spring in the 33 actuators - ran 10psi and boosted it to 14 when he wanted to have fun.

reckons you wouldn't run it for too long on more pound than that if you wanted the turbo to last for a while.

standard 33 turbos aren't meant to run much more than 14psi but by all means can't hurt to boost it more if its working for you it just won't last as long :(

Stock R33 turbo's actually start loosing power after about 14psi....14psi is the maximum i would go on a stocko r33 turbo as its not just that more boost = more power....its also the efficiency of that turbo...i am running a stock turbo on my RB25 (i know) on 12psi for the last 2 years....and its still going strong.....and it cops it most of the time

As Allen has already said, i ran 18psi with a stock turbo when i had the rb20 in and it was fine.

When i had the cheap manual boost control in before changing over to a blitz electronic bc, boost didnt come on as strong.

I totally recommend you go with a electronic boost controller if you crank the boost higher than std. I found that going with the electronic bc, gave better boost without spikes happening. You can change all sorts of settings to get a better response.

Im suprised it never went bang considering i use to give it a hard time. I think you will be oright! :D

When I first got my stock-as-a-rock S2 R33 in 2004, I boosted it up to 14psi, thrashed the daylights out of it as I was looking really hard for an excuse to fit the newly built forged RB25/30 that was in the shed waiting to go in, she lasted about 4 months (which was 3 months and 2 weeks longer than I expected it to last) before the turbine wheel snapped off clean.....enough said.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...