Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi i recently drove from adelaide to geelong and today i got a sppeding fine for 104kmph in a 100 zone somewhere just in the vic border, normally in SA there is about a 10% allowance, but 4k over in a 100 zone is just stupid.

Just trying to find out from you victorians if this is the norm over there, also do you know what the fine and demerit point loss would be as the vechile was registed in a company name and at the moment they just wont the driver nominated, cheers Clint

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28110-speed-cameras-in-vic/
Share on other sites

welcome to Brack's Victoria where Safety is paramount! Now you know why there are now 100,000 Victorians suddenly 1 fine away from losing their licence (me included). In the last 12 months I have had 4 fines from speeding <10% over the limit.

The fine will be $110 I think and you HAVE to nominate a driver. You have a few months to do this or else the fine will double until a driver is nominated! (I drive a company car so I tried to avoid nominating myself once!)

you psycho.. 104 in a 100 zone - what do you think you are doing? you could have killed 50 people there...

100,000 close to losing their license? where did you get that from? well i am one of them ;)

I have always wondered the impact of all of this over the longer term. 3 years to keep 12 points in this current system is just ridiculous. Even old ladies will be losing their license eventually.

What happens to the productivity of the state when people can't drive to work, guess they can't pay all those toll roads or massive petrol excises either?

This is the reason I take the train to work now. If I'm going to have money stolen from me, I'm at least going to have it done while having fun, not while paying some dumbass toll while sitting in some queue for 30mins avg speed of 10k then get busted for doing 62 in 60 zone.

The government, in their money-grabbing wisdom (sorry, safety-oriented wisdom), decreed that it you would now only be permitted a 3% or 3kph (whichever was the greater) variance in the speed before being pinged and forced to make a contribution to the state's consolidated revenue.

and even then the $206M surplus is largely due to an unexpected increase in state stamp duty. Soon as the housing boom ends, goodbye Victoria.

Oh yer...

Meanwhile, Premier Steve Bracks was forced to defend the 33.7 per cent jump in revenue from speeding tickets, traffic infringements and other fees and fines to $567.7 million in 2002-03. The revenue was a significant contributor to the budget bottom line

3kmph i doubt half the speedos in old cars would be that accurate, another good reason to live in SA.

If you dont nominate the driver the fine is $600 plus the normal fine, so add another $110 or whateve it is. Anyone know the demerit points lost?, cheers Clint

Originally posted by Clint32

3kmph i doubt half the speedos in old cars would be that accurate, another good reason to live in SA.  

If you dont nominate the driver the fine is $600 plus the normal fine, so add another $110 or whateve it is. Anyone know the demerit points lost?, cheers Clint

Even new cars are built with a 10% tollerance inaccuracy in their speedo, but facts dont matter to the bracks government!!

Bracks needs everyone of those speed cameras rammed up his ass sideways!!

Well thank you Brack$, I hope you never ever get re-elected and perhaps you'll die from STD. And I'll just sell my car and move home.

http://heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_...55E2862,00.html

Seriously this is the most ridiculous the whole speed camera revenue raising episode has climbed to.

from the same edition

AN elderly woman died yesterday when her car veered off the road, hit a fence and rolled on to its side in Melbourne's northern suburbs.
Bloody car, must have a mind of its own- to veer off the road by itself :(
Originally posted by bobothegayclown

if it was a camera, then you dont have to nominate the driver, but you have to pay the 'corporate' fine... something like 3x the norm... so its not really worth it unless your a) rich or B) right at the end of your points.

Huh? What do you mean? I've ben snapped in a work car and in my own car and the fines and points are the same in both situations.

It's called TAX...this has nothing at all to do with road-safety and is liable to cause more accidents than it prevents.

You add this to your PAYE, PAYG, GST, Stamp duty (houses and cars), fuel excise, car rego, city link tolls, parking meters, parking fines etc etc etc and you try to live on what you have left and hope there is enough left over to fix the damage done to your car by stones and bad roads cos "they" aint responsible (the only good road in the state is city-link) and we must all be terrible drivers otherwise they wouldn't need the cameras...right? When u think that everything you do costs money and a tax of some sort, where the hell does the money go ?!?! Why can't they put some back into driver education so that we are all actually safer?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...