Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did a photoshoot for a friend of mine.. Will only post up 2 for now, as i dont think she wants all her photos posted across the forums lol..

- Yup no skin processing as we both didnt want to do it.. We wanted natural looks and skin tones. Hope you like it.

IMG_9199_resizesig.jpg

IMG_9191a_resizesig.jpg

Edited by siddr20
  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i meant te skin smoothing or whatever. her laugh lines and stuff really add character to the photo.

Yup exactly.. Thats why i dont like airbrushed pics.. Takes away the persons character and self image i guess..

I like the 2nd one best. Woulda been better if her hand wasn't cut out of the frame though...

I know.. Didnt see it when taking the photo :rofl:

Two more pics from the yesterday:

IMG_9070_resize.jpg

IMG_9216_resize.jpg

IMG_9106_resize.jpg

Edited by siddr20
bnr#@ - You have a beautiful dog!! what exact breed is it? I like this series of pics. captured nicely :)

GoldZilla - :) hehe yea probably too much angle in the shot.

She needed to turn her head a little bit more to her right as well as her left eye is under-exposed but it's really only a minor thing. :down:

You've done well. :ermm:

bnr#@ - You have a beautiful dog!! what exact breed is it? I like this series of pics. captured nicely :)

GoldZilla - :) hehe yea probably too much angle in the shot.

Cheers

Not mine, its a friends, hes cool though.

Its a rhodesian ridgeback so big bugger...

Ian - Didnt notice that will you pointed it out just then!! Good eye!! :P hahah

bnr#@ - goes to google to search more about it.. I always wanted a dog lol

Slim - AHAHAHHAH so true!! Will keep that in mind for the next shoots i do.. Cheers man

Few more pics of Jori:

IMG_9415_resizesigborder.jpg

IMG_9266_resize.jpg

IMG_9337_resizeborder.jpg

Im off to bed now.. peace out!!

Edited by siddr20

i like the 2nd one, looks great!

speaking of dogs, playing with a friends 50mm 1.4 AF pentax lens to compare it with my old manual...

3801403352_621a529b03.jpg

looks pretty good. but i still think the old one has more sharpness to it :P

Ian (Xmetal) kindly lent me his f/1.8 50mm Canon lens to experiment with, and I was using it to capture some water shots I've been experimenting with, and learn more about my camera and its controls in the process.

Anyway, a few hours before I gave it back to him (thanks again, man!), i went out to experiment with different apertures to see what results I would get regarding depth of field... My old man had his car parked out the front, and it was a good time of day with the sun starting to set, so off I went outside with camera and tripod... I haven't done any post-processing on the shots.

Here are the two extremes of aperture and how they affected the DoF in the shot;

f1.8, 1/500 shutter speed, ISO-200

IMG_1486.jpg

f/22, 1/13 shutter speed, ISO-800

IMG_1487.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Increasing overlap will bring the torque down earlier (and make your idle sound sick lol). Worth a shot (if you dyno time) to experience a bit (providing you are confident your valves won't kiss your pistons). Is to just take off 5 degrees across the boosted area of the map, and then retard the exhaust cam let's say, 3 degrees at a time and then overlay all the runs with VCT on all the way and VCT off as soon as you make positive pressure. Ideally you would have a total of 6x overlays to looks at 0 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve 0 exhaust & VCT on all the way -5 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -5 exhaust & VCT on all the way -10 exhaust & VCT off once manifold pressure is +ve -10 exhaust & VCT on all the way Just leave your O2 wideband closed loop on for all of the boost area & RPM, and hopefully there isn't too much fuel correction needed and the Haltech is fast enough to compensate (I do this, then apply the correction to the main table). Getting that overlay data should give you a good indication of what to aim for.
    • So, my main limitation here is that the car does not have an oil pressure sensor by default, just a switch. As part of my tune I bought an oil pressure sensor upgrade so I now have access to oil pressure levels and logging rather than just the boolean behaviour of the switch but this means I need to use the tuning app to display this value. So, this rules out using any other app on the iPad. The app will also flash when pressure drops which is a nice feature. I have replaced the centre screen with an Android one, which is awesome for Android Auto, but I think it might be too far away and out of my line of sight. I might add some gauges to it this weekend and just see. I guess if its just temp and oil pressure I can make them massive! 🤣  
    • This is what the look like normally. Except we only got the 2 doors locally
    • Back pressure is not really a function of the exhaust itself, but the turbine/housing. So the question/point remains valid. I would be fitting an EMAP tapping point and seeing what is going on in the exhaust manifold before committing to throwing boost at it. Flow. No intercooler is actually rated for continuous operation at any power level wrt temperatures, as they are no actually capable of shifting the required amounts of heat on a continuous basis. They get hot during a pul, then dump some of that heat into the external air (and some back into the internal air) during off load moments/periods). You probaby do need a bigger core, given the power level you're already at is somewhat above the "rating" of the cooler. Put pressure tapping points either side of the core (which possibly you already have, if you have a boost source near the compressor outlet and tapping near the throttle for existing purposes) and report on delta P across the core.   I haven't done the mass flow calculation to see where you would be sitting on the compressor map at the ~450is rwkW level we're talking here, but if you look just at the PR you're running at, which is ~2.8-2.9, then you have a really really wide swath of the compressor map to run in, and so long as you were making between about 45-75 lb/min of flow, you should have really good comp efficiency, with the ideal being betweem 55 and 65. I can't see the need to shift drastically on the map to get better results.
    • Welcome 🙂 The ER34 wheels and slight lowering suit the R33 sedan really well. I'm firmly in the 'keep it stock, at least on the outside' camp.
×
×
  • Create New...