Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

See this is where you need to get yourself one of those home grown LINK's Lithium. Could have logged it all fully and had a nice graph. Video was a shocker :devil: I'll take your word it was better, and it stands to reason it should be with the norgren doing its job.

I guess the reality is, if you had an electronic controller that COMPLETELY kept the boost away from the actuator till just before the level your trying to obtain (obviously this varies with each setup due to spiking etc) , then it would obtain the same results.

I guess thats why i liked the Eboost2, as you can actually adjust the 'set' point it holds boost off till. Duty and gain and set point are user adjustable.

Without whacking a CRO on the solenoids of any controller you can only guess whats really going on.

Once my new motor is built, i'll do some testing on the dyno to gauge absoloute best responce (ie plumb boost to top port of ext gate and remove bottom boost supply) , then see what the gizzmo can achieve once a baseline is established

Getting the best case scenario is the most important thing..... how many times do people on here post up boost responce from a certain combo, yet without knowing the best case, its hard to know if thats as good as it gets or not. Remember , tune comes into it alot also, not just the equiptment, and exhaust etc etc .

Look forward to the new dyno boost graphs to compare Lith, once car is ready to go back.

Just thinking about this, to achieve the same results as the Norgren Lith, all i would do is use an Aux output from the LINK G4 (or your pref choice ecu) to drive the same boost solenoid the (xxx) boost controller is using, and then set that Aux to be constantly on until it reached (xx) boost level, once there it turns off and the (xxx) boost controller is back in control ! :( Cost nothing but a little time (less than plumbing in the norgren and mounting it)

Gary

Edited by Fastrotor
  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I guess the reality is, if you had an electronic controller that COMPLETELY kept the boost away from the actuator till just before the level your trying to obtain (obviously this varies with each setup due to spiking etc) , then it would obtain the same results.

Exactly - the fact that disconnecting the actuator boost signal brought the boost on earlier means the EBC is clearly not doing its job. If the primary problem was with the actuator spring tension this wouldnt have happened.

That valve is just making up for a crappy EBC AFAICT

Of course if you increase the wastegate size you may need to increase the actuator spring stiffness to compensate, as force = pressure x area.

Forces opening wastegate: exhaust against wastegate flapper and boost against actuator diaphragm

Forces closing wastegate: actuator spring (or if you have one of those dual port actuators that you posted up, the other side of the actuator diaphragm)

Exactly - the fact that disconnecting the actuator boost signal brought the boost on earlier means the EBC is clearly not doing its job. If the primary problem was with the actuator spring tension this wouldnt have happened.

That valve is just making up for a crappy EBC AFAICT

Yep agreed, a bit annoyed as the AVC-R was supposed to be a flash wee piece of equipment.

  • 2 weeks later...
See this is where you need to get yourself one of those home grown LINK's Lithium. Could have logged it all fully and had a nice graph. Video was a shocker ;) I'll take your word it was better, and it stands to reason it should be with the norgren doing its job.

Look forward to the new dyno boost graphs to compare Lith, once car is ready to go back.

Just thinking about this, to achieve the same results as the Norgren Lith, all i would do is use an Aux output from the LINK G4 (or your pref choice ecu) to drive the same boost solenoid the (xxx) boost controller is using, and then set that Aux to be constantly on until it reached (xx) boost level, once there it turns off and the (xxx) boost controller is back in control ! :D Cost nothing but a little time (less than plumbing in the norgren and mounting it)

Yeah this is one of the reasons I don't want to spend big money on changing the boost control setup, I would like to get a G4 and use its boost control functionality and sell the AVC-R on - I have looked at the software and it is very very nice. There is the possibility of a bit of a change in my overall setup at some point too, though I'd like to wind the GT30R up first and see what it can do.

I am a bit loathed to spend much money at the moment due to the effect the economy is having on my situation so will just be doing a road tune to touch it up a bit, there was no real timing and a bunch of fuel in the zones I wasn't previously hitting so I didn't pop it while testing so hopefully that will boost the torque even more - but there is a dyno day on the 26th September which I hope to put the Skyline on, so will be able to put up some more solid results. It would be good as I don't really have a decent idea of exactly what the spool is doing myself.

I tried doing another clip just to see where it starts building from etc, this time just loading it up in 3rd so you don't lose complete view of the tacho - if you have decent sound you should be able to hear where I put it into load and how long the turbo takes to spool up. I was running 1bar here, which was reached before 3500rpm... sorry I can't reference boost at the same time :woot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uxnc9uK_D0w

Just thinking about this, to achieve the same results as the Norgren Lith, all i would do is use an Aux output from the LINK G4 (or your pref choice ecu) to drive the same boost solenoid the (xxx) boost controller is using, and then set that Aux to be constantly on until it reached (xx) boost level, once there it turns off and the (xxx) boost controller is back in control ! :woot: Cost nothing but a little time (less than plumbing in the norgren and mounting it)

Gary

the other way to set up the boost control is to run the solenoid the other way so that it is NC instead of NO so no duty = max boost and high duty = minimal boost. that way the solenoid is closed and off when the turbo is building boost and then starts opening once it is on boost. though this is entirely reliant on your boost controller/ecu being mapped by duty cycle rather than set a boost level and leave it also if the solenoid/controller fails you run unlimited boost.

the other way to set up the boost control is to run the solenoid the other way so that it is NC instead of NO so no duty = max boost and high duty = minimal boost. that way the solenoid is closed and off when the turbo is building boost and then starts opening once it is on boost. though this is entirely reliant on your boost controller/ecu being mapped by duty cycle rather than set a boost level and leave it also if the solenoid/controller fails you run unlimited boost.

Yeah I don't really see the advantage it doing it that way... definitely more -'s than +'s.

it helps bring on boost faster as the wastegate has no way of opening before hitting boost. its also useful in high exhaust back pressure applications (such as antilag) where the pressure can cause the wastegate to leak/creep open

Titan,

i agree it would work, however abit dangerous, and i don't know of any controllers that work in reverse.... ie more duty for less boost, do you know of any that are able to be configured this way ?

Lith,

The G4 is an awesome bit of gear. I have the R33 plugin board, and i have also moddified it abit running some wires inside to bring out all the extra in's /out's not being used as well as using the expansion connector. However the boost controller is not active... ie you can map a 3d table to respond to boost drop etc, but its not actively tracking and correcting boost. It was supposed to be released in the latest firmware update, but alas no..... other than that, its awesome.

Gary

I will be trying it out on my vipec plugin board as the open loop boost control is based on a solenoid duty value rather than a specific boost figure.

The car has a wideband O2 sensor and display permanently hooked up (running wideband closed loop) and the check engine idiot light is set to trigger if the boost goes any more than ~3psi over what it should be.

Edited by TiTAN
it helps bring on boost faster as the wastegate has no way of opening before hitting boost. its also useful in high exhaust back pressure applications (such as antilag) where the pressure can cause the wastegate to leak/creep open

AVC-R has no option for no duty, so one way or another its going to be allowing pressure through to the actuator. I believe 20% to 90% are the options, which is a bit of a pain in the arse.

I will be trying it out on my vipec plugin board as the open loop boost control is based on a solenoid duty value rather than a specific boost figure.

The car has a wideband O2 sensor and display permanently hooked up (running wideband closed loop) and the check engine idiot light is set to trigger if the boost goes any more than ~3psi over what it should be.

Yeah you could have 100% duty until close to the boost you want , then ramp down rapidly to the correct duty, then roll off duty rapidly again if it exceeds the boost level you want. I would have tried this too, however mine was doing weird things.... like running fine at a set boost, but then suddenly dropping boost, and you had to go in and wind up the duty to get back to same boost ... weird. A local workshop has had several cars give same problems also, so we gave up on it. I've got a gizzmo MS-IBC , but i have yet to give it a good try out, since im still driving round on 5 cylinders. Once the new 3ltr is done, i'll invest some time into it.

The gizzmo has a minimun of 10% duty it seems.... none seem to allow 0% ...... maybe the eboost2 does since you can set the "set point" .... which holds off until a set boost. I will scope the duty cycle of the eboost2 next time a car comes to me with one fitted.

So can't wait for the new 3ltr to come, can't wait to see what TIP it gets with the .82 housing ! When it gets here i'll turn the boost right back up on the 25 and see what the TIP is , as i didnt get a chance to before it killed cyl1 ring land. And i can't afford to risk it until new motor is sitting here :) (it did 316rwkw with a 76psi cyl1 and no5 coil pack spring missing !! (don't ask) and all through a 3500 stall)

Gary

Oh, yeah , forgot you were going to plumb it the opposite the normal way.... but then again if your going to use open loop and have full control of the duty, why not just plumb it normal and start with 100% duty (when over idle revs say, to stop solenoid getting hot if idling)

That way you get same results, just an added saftey margin if the solenoid or wiring etc fails.

Are you using ext gate titan or internal ? i keep thinking of ext gate as thats what i use.

Gary

  • 4 weeks later...

Here is a dyno plot from a dyno day the other weekend, shows the waver I described that happens when the valve opens but basically represents a far more solid power delivery than the old curve:

lith_dyno284.jpg

Overlayed the old vs new using the SAU/Godzilla motorsports (!?) dyno database:

http://tools.godzillamotorsport.com/dyno/l...=76,108&Y=R

Also was a cool day in the fact the car had the highest figure for the day until a Lamborghini Gallardo came along and pegged me by 3 lowsy kw lol

Edited by Lithium

Nah sorry, I had to harrass Andre a fair bit just to get the dyno plot - he is really busy due to drag season starting in NZ and he has methanol drag cars with big huge turbos to play with and I feel bad rattling cages asking for info on mediocre power cars with that kind of thing going on.

It basically hit around 16psi by 3700rpm, dropped a bit then climbed to around 17psi in the 4-5krpm area and dropped down to 15-16psi in the 5000-6000rpm area and levelled off there... from memory.

Edited by Lithium
  • 3 months later...

Next step in this saga, I am now another happy user of the big can 1.2bar actuator :D Well at least so far...

Installed it and took it out for a blat yesterday, and with my pressure relief valve and AVC-R completely removed from the picture I was still reaching 1bar by around 3700rpm - which was impossible with the old actuator without removing the hose. I turned the AVCR on and set it to 1.1bar, and I am reaching full boost by 3600rpm without relying on the pressure relief valve - and as a result I don't seem subject to the big random spikes I used to get with the PRV.

Very happy with this, feels much more consistant in power delivery and probably safer - it does appear to have a SLIGHT 1psi fluctuation as it comes on full boost but I would guess this is normal.

So, so far so good, next stop... dyno tune :)

Ah, explains that drop off at 3,500-4,000 where I am guessing you are coming onto full boost is. Should be gone for the most part with a good tune.

Almost looks like wheel spin if it wasn't on a dynapak :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...