Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 358
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gaaaaaaaaaaate and limiter. Alah alah Brisby!

Words on forums mean nothing, results on paper mean everything - there is nothing else to say.

I'll bring down an S15 in November...you bring down a VL...and we'll let the paper results speak :laugh:

I'm a bit out of the loop with the pissing contest, where did you finish in the results Birds?

For reference I ended up 18th and I was happy with that given it was my first deca, how many issues I had on the day, and how badly I drove <-- biggest factor :laugh:

I'd agree with the earlier comments about the semi's, I had used ones on and they had less grip than street tyres by a mile. At one point they started to get some heat up though and I had a half decent go at the sweeper on the long wang.

I'll bring down an S15 in November...you bring down a VL...and we'll let the paper results speak ;)

My Money will be on adz as well.. Id say give adz a Barina and he would still win :laugh: least there would be no Limiter and hard Launches!!!

I'm a bit out of the loop with the pissing contest, where did you finish in the results Birds?

For reference I ended up 18th and I was happy with that given it was my first deca, how many issues I had on the day, and how badly I drove <-- biggest factor :D

26th mate :D

I felt much the same way as it was my first DECA too...thought I did okay with the skidpan stuff (aside from amassing WDs) but held back on the wangs for fear of wrecking my daily hehe. Did you miss out on much driving during your trip to the barn?

Mate I'll do you one better, I'll bring down my Holden Combo and still wipe the floor with you. Cheers. :D

Let's do it!

LOL...of course you would need a car with more power and better handling to be able to win haha

You know, I don't doubt for a second he's a better driver than me, but my point is that results from a non-homologated event mean SFA.

Damn, just missed out on finishing in the top half, good luck for November then :D

Will you be attending the track day at Winton in October? (I think it's in October...)

The SlowVia and I will be there with bells on.

LOL all this about driving slowly make you quicker....

http://www.pbase.com/sooty34/image/116264331

http://www.pbase.com/sooty34/image/116264338

proof is in the pudding - I drove like this all day with gate an limiter and still came out faster AND I drive it home

I got one WD for doing an extra LOOP around a cone... I think i should have gotten extra points for style :D

DECA times are a pretty good indicator of driver ability IMO,

the lack of grip means that for people to be doing the times that they are means they must know what they are doing behind the wheel...

And also the fact that you have to go straight into competition with no practice means you have to be super committed straight out of the box... (This is somthing that I struggle with..)

And don't think its all about the power..

Last year there was a datto with 75rwkw that had the fastest time on the mini-wang....

or the 140rwkw Porches beating 300+kw GTR's on the Long Wang

And I believe a little Toyota Echo that showed some gtr's a thing or two on the skid pan...

And as for having a better handling car... Just look at what I'm stuck with... :D

Damn, just missed out on finishing in the top half, good luck for November then :D

Will you be attending the track day at Winton in October? (I think it's in October...)

The SlowVia and I will be there with bells on.

Nah mate! I'm too scared to track my daily...I'm still rebuilding my daily from 4 years ago so I don't need two projects lol.

DECA times are a pretty good indicator of driver ability IMO,

the lack of grip means that for people to be doing the times that they are means they must know what they are doing behind the wheel...

And also the fact that you have to go straight into competition with no practice means you have to be super committed straight out of the box... (This is somthing that I struggle with..)

And don't think its all about the power..

Last year there was a datto with 75rwkw that had the fastest time on the mini-wang....

or the 140rwkw Porches beating 300+kw GTR's on the Long Wang

And I believe a little Toyota Echo that showed some gtr's a thing or two on the skid pan...

And as for having a better handling car... Just look at what I'm stuck with... :D

I reckon the results are a good indicator when you have standout drivers beating awesome cars with not so awesome vehicles, for sure. But there's no denying a general correlation between good results and good cars...that is why we bother to modify our cars with good tyres and power, true? I just think there's so much variability between the cars that it's near impossible to determine unless you get two people to drive the same car :D

I thought you did pretty darn well...I've driven a Corona before and whilst fun with the handbrake they are no go kart!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...