Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys!

I have an R32 GTS4 - Yes.. I know.. strange choice for drifter.. dont worry.. ATTESSA is going to be stripped out soon.

Now, I need more lock on the thing! I find myself hitting full lock very often and not getting that sideways.

I have a couple of questions,

1) Is the GTS4 and GTST steering rack different? I find that my GTS4 has the turning circle of a truck. Would it be worth tracking down a GTST steering rack?

2) What steering racks have poeple swapped with the R32 rack for more lock?

3) What products (steering rack spacers, tie rod ends, lower control arms etc.) have people used to gain more lock? Any feedback? Whats good? Whats crap? Prices? Where can I find them from?

Any other feedback on what people have done for more lock would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks guys! :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/283627-need-more-lock-on-r32/
Share on other sites

it's nothing to do with rack. it's to do with the fact that your car is 4wd and as such has front driveshafts. imagine the driveshaft angles!! that is why you cannot get much steering lock on any awd car, front driveshafts.

the only way out is remove the drive shafts, weld up sump etc. but it's a shitload of hassle. would be far easier to just start with a 2wd car. plus with your current car you still ahve extra weight of transfer case and any other awd associated bits.

Thats all well and good.

ATTESSA will be stripped soon enough.. rip out the front diff and use a RWD sump.

But once thats happened.. what can i do for more lock?

well first it's good to know exactly what's restricting lock. the steering rack only moves so far, the knuckles have a stopper which corresponds with a little tab on the LCA which stops lock, the tyres can foul against the chassis rails, and the knuckles start binding past a certain amount of steering angle.

so first things first, u can put some steering rack spacers which allow the rack to move further. from here the knuckles will start to stop on the LCA's, so u will need to modify either the tab on the LCA, or the stopper on the knuckles. around the same time u will have issues with tyres fouling on the chassis rails depending on what tyres/wheels ur running. if the tyre is big enough and offset is high enough u will have issues. for example i scrub with 5mm rack spacers, 17x9 +24's with 235/45's. few things u can do to stop this, either go lower profile, thinner tyre, or lower offset. u can also go longer LCA's like R33 ones which push the wheel out a bit further.

from there u will start experiencing binding issues on the standard knuckles, so then the next step is new knuckles or cut and shut ones. this can change things like ackerman angle, length of the knuckle, shape etc etc, which not only provides more lock, it reduces binding and changes the feel in the steering, as well as the turn ratio.

  • Like 1

Interesting that you scrub with that offset stewy?

I have installed the 5mm rack spacers in my 32 gtst and the increased lock is quite massive.

I am running R33 GTR wheels 17x9 +30 with 235/45/17 tyres and it doesnt scrub on the rails. I definitely couldn't get more lock as the wheels nearly hit the castor arms at the front. I have noticed that the tabs on the LCA are now doing their job and stopping it there. That's a good thing!

My only problem now is that my solid brake lines on the caliper are now pushed onto the rim at full lock. Not a good thing! I'm investigating braided lines now.

yeh, i should note however i had extra lock due to the tabs on my LCA's being dented in a good 4mm from hitting the lock stops drifting over time. i keep forgetting about that haha. when i put R33 LCA's in with undented tabs, they gave me a few cm of clearance from the rails. but they did pull the wheel out a bit due to being longer.

and it was very minor scrubbing, in fact i didnt even notice it drifting on full lock, it was only when doing a u-turn or something at full lock on uneven ground (up a curb or something) it was just touching the rails.

This is a stupid question..

But what are steering rack spacers?

What do they look like?

How do they work?

Are they similr to some sort of shim?

How do you install them?

http://www.gktech.com.au/products/?ID=160

I have wondered about installing steering rack spacers on my car. The thing that I am not sure about is that if these spacers allow your wheels to travel further, wouldnt you run into problems with the wheels rubbing on the front sway bar and castor rods? My wheels are already rubbing the sway bar and castor rods at full lock. I have 17" wheels with 235's, car has been lowered slightly.

Thanks for that Nisskid. I understand how spacers allow the wheels to travel further, but am I still right to be concerned about extra rubbing as a result? See my attached picture (I apologise in advance for how crap it is).

With the further travel of the wheel, wont it now rub on the castor rod + front sway bar (the pink bits on my pic)? As my wheels already do this when at lock I am wondering if spacers will even do anything for me. IE: having extra travel isnt go to do anything if the wheel is already stopped by other suspension bits.

Sorry for stealing thread a little but hopefully we can all benefit from this :D

post-37832-1251113142_thumb.jpg

My R32gtst has s14 rack (more lock) and spacers (more lock again) and does not rub on anything. 6.5 caster, 3 deg toe out, 2inch lower than standard ride height. I run standard wheels with 205/50 tyres. hope it helps a bit. :)

I noticed the GTR racks a re totally different to GTST. it was as if one side had a different knuckle geometry to the other. one tie rod was longer than the other..also you can buy AM tie rods with integrated spacer and comes with thinner spacers (washers) to give you max lock.

Cheers

  • 3 weeks later...
well first it's good to know exactly what's restricting lock. the steering rack only moves so far, the knuckles have a stopper which corresponds with a little tab on the LCA which stops lock, the tyres can foul against the chassis rails, and the knuckles start binding past a certain amount of steering angle.

so first things first, u can put some steering rack spacers which allow the rack to move further. from here the knuckles will start to stop on the LCA's, so u will need to modify either the tab on the LCA, or the stopper on the knuckles. around the same time u will have issues with tyres fouling on the chassis rails depending on what tyres/wheels ur running. if the tyre is big enough and offset is high enough u will have issues. for example i scrub with 5mm rack spacers, 17x9 +24's with 235/45's. few things u can do to stop this, either go lower profile, thinner tyre, or lower offset. u can also go longer LCA's like R33 ones which push the wheel out a bit further.

from there u will start experiencing binding issues on the standard knuckles, so then the next step is new knuckles or cut and shut ones. this can change things like ackerman angle, length of the knuckle, shape etc etc, which not only provides more lock, it reduces binding and changes the feel in the steering, as well as the turn ratio.

So as a temp measure for someone with 33GTR wheels and tie rod spacers whos wheels are hitting something on full lock, (235/45/17 KU36, sounds like rim hitting LCA or chassis), could I fit a spacer on the front until i can get knuckles? are knuckles a proper fix for this and more lock?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...