Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 716
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Id assume the stock girdle strengthens to front to back flex, and this would strengthen the side flex

but I'dsuggest to speak with platinum racing for more details on it, im aware they have 2 products 1 is the brace (purple) the other is a brace and awd conversion (blue)

Sump rail and girdle are milled for exact height, the edges of the girdle are machined at an exact angle on a mill, 32 holes are drilled and tapped on the sump rail and girdle for it to bolt onto

Yeah but there is a good chance only 1 in 50 people will actually understand the details, which i have skipped some detail (i can add all the maths with all working out in as well if you like, would be a very long post :P )

Oh and I've ground 29 thou off so far, re cc'd it and its now at 64cc's which would make it 8.67:1CR (before with the 69.6 would have been 8.06:1CR)

And Fatz you think Skylines are high maintenance wait till the little one pokes it's head out omg they eat any spare time whole.

I have an 11 week old and between work, house and him I am flat out and f**ked if I could tell you where all the time actually goes hehe but when they look, smile and laugh at you it's all worth it.

Well i took another 15 thou off, im at 62.1cc's

ok the comp ratio maths

SV

bore x stroke

86.5 x 86.5 / 4 = 1870.5625

x 3.142 x 85 = 499,571.13688

/ 1000 = 499.57113 (SV)

Engine cc's

4.99.57113 x 6 = 2,997.42678cc's

/ 1000 = 2.99743 litre

CV

Head gasket

88 x 88 / 4 = 1936

x 3.142 x 1.2 = 7299.4944

/ 1000 = 7.29949

Deck to top ring

86.5 x 86.5 / 4 = 1870.5625

x 3.142 x 6 = 35,263.84425

/ 1000 = 35.26384

85.65 x 85.65 / 4 = 1833.98063

x 3.142 x 6 = 34,574.20284

/ 1000 = 34.5742

35.26384 - 34.5742 = 0.68964

Piston dome volume

85.65 x 85.65 / 4 = 1833.98063

x 3.142 x 1.397 = 8,050.02689

/ 1000 = 8.05003

Volume around dome measures 1.8cc's

8.05003 - 1.8 = 6.25

piston above deck height

85.65 x 85.65 / 4 = 1833.98063

x 3.142 x 0.1016 = 585.4565

/ 1000 = 0.58546

7.29949 + 0.68964 - 6.25 - 0.58546 = 1.15367

+ Head cc's

69.6 + 1.15367 = 70.75367

+ 499.57113 = 570.3248

/ 70.75367 = 8.06 :1

Also did

64cc's = 8.67:1

62 = 8.91:1

60 = 9.17:1

61 = 9.04:1

61.5 = 8.97:1

61.3 = 8.99:1

61.2 = 9.01:1

So that how i worked out it needed between 61.2 and 61.3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've seen similar actually in my situation. You never know what tables are attempted to be used when the car thinks it's -99C or +200C. The fail state is not usually that extreme but you know what I mean - it was in my case though! This is where being able to read all the sensors is useful cause you see this stuff really quickly.
    • The above is very important. However as long as you keep timing relatively low, it's plausible to make your own knock ears and plausible to learn to tune with a modern ECU that can do wideband O2 correction like a boost controller. I mean if you only have one viable road to even drive the car on, learning to tinker to this level may be worth doing given you can't do much else with the car...?
    • I find the fact that the rear plate has to be bent inwards at the rear not so bad: but the front is just awful: It's like come on. (these are my very old, now retired/turned in plates) TBH it is a lot of money to fix a minor issue, the fact I said "I'll never really spend the money on doing this" is why people ended up buying them as a gift for a 'car guy' who can be hard to shop for.. for car guy things.
    • I just bent the ends of my premo plates. It even went through Regency like that after the engine conversion and the inspector (a great bloke!) just squinted his eyes and said "I didn't see that". Plates, and how they look, are just something that have zero importance to me.
    • Yeah, I would have said the same. It makes me suggest that there are other things wrong, such that the ECU is totally unhappy with the broken sensor. The only other thought here is that maybe it is shorted, which might cause a different issue to the typical "disconnected" sensor.
×
×
  • Create New...