Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Het gotRICE, what you talking about

I know I have these specs with my a series 1 r33 gts25t..... I actually tested 1st to 4th speeds out today

Drivetrain

Transmission 5 speed manual

Gear Ratios Maximum Speed in Gears (* theoretical)

1 3.214 62 km/h (38 mph)

2 1.925 104 km/h (65 mph)

3 1.302 154 km/h (96 mph)

4 1.000 200 km/h (124 mph)

5 0.752 266 km/h (165 mph)*

As far as I know mine is all standard Diff/Gearbox.

Weird, I wouldn't have said it made those sorts of speeds either, but I plugged the gearbox ratio / diff ratio information in, and it seems to come up similar. From a quick poke around on the site, R34/R33 manual gearbox have the same diff ratio of: 4.11 (apparently auto r34 is more like 4.0, and 4.363 on r33). And using the gearbox ratios as above (which seem to match up with what I've read through google/sau-search, of 1 - 3.214, 2 - 1.925, 3 - 1.302, 4 - 1.000, 5 - 0.752). And taking into account R34 wheel size of 225/45/R17, and 7500RPM...

R33/R34 Manual

1st 67kph

2nd 113kph

3rd 167kph

4th 218kph

5th 290kph

I would have said the figures were slightly lower than that from my own personal experience, but it can't imagine it would be too far off.

Reference URLs:

http://www.darktide.net/~jrm/topspeed.html

http://justskylines.com/skyline/knowledgeb...calculator.aspx

Well at the drag strip i was reading 13.7 @ 100mph, and 100mph is 160.9km/h, and i was well into 4th crossing the line.

Probly not the greatest idea to admit doing 200km/h on a public road either.

But i guess where our debate conflicts is at what RPM are you reaching 160km/h? Clearly if your shifting at the stock redline then id say i was correct. But if your talking about non-standard rev limits thats a different story.

Both of thosae videos are pretty spot on at shifting at 7000rpm. If you went to 8000 then sure you'd get 160+ easily.

Edited by gotRICE?
Probly not the greatest idea to admit doing 200km/h on a public road either.

Not the greatest idea to assume it wasn't done on a dyno / drag strip / race track / private runway either

Well at the drag strip i was reading 13.7 @ 100mph, and 100mph is 160.9km/h, and i was well into 4th crossing the line.

you should of been well into 4th.

When you change from say 3rd to 4th at 7000rpm the revs dont drop to 1000rpm do they?

It will drop from say 7000rpm to like 5000+rpm depending on the driver. So you would be doing 5000+rpm in 4th @ 160km/h "well into 4th i'd say"

Not the greatest idea to assume it wasn't done on a dyno / drag strip / race track / private runway either

you should of been well into 4th.

When you change from say 3rd to 4th at 7000rpm the revs dont drop to 1000rpm do they?

It will drop from say 7000rpm to like 5000+rpm depending on the driver. So you would be doing 5000+rpm in 4th @ 160km/h "well into 4th i'd say"

I fail to see your point in that post. As your now not disagreeing with me, just trying to pick a hole in a comment made.

Regardless of how we interpret "well into 4th", me meaning i was in 4th for a second or two before crossing the line. Not just releasing the clutch as i crossed it. I was hard back on the accelerator.

Go out to your private airstrip/dyno/drag strip, hold the revs at 7000rpm in 3rd gear, and take a picture of the speedo. The 2nd video CLEARLY shows that @ 7000rpm the car is only doing approx 145-150km/h.

lol,

its like 5-10km/h off, take into account that video wasn't made when the car was brand new and that the gear speeds are theoretical as I stated.

You don't even know if that video IS a completely stock car down to exhaust and rims.

Anyway your the one who said....

Dont know what R33 box/diff your running but it doesnt make 160km/h in 3rd.

in return to someone saying....

Just put're in 3rd gear, RB25DET GB+Diff goes up to 160km/h or so in third and you should feel a bit of pull

When clearly 3rd gear can do a "theoretical" 154 km/h (96 mph)

im not being picky I just think you where wrong to say "it doesn't make 160km/h in 3rd." :D

yer just anotherthing if i dont have any cold air intakes or pod is having a fmic still considered unroadworthy in victoria ?

In VIC you can only have one intake mod.

So either a FMIC or an air pod.

Some ppl go both but they shield up the pod, its a bit dodgy, but you can do it that way. LOL!

D'oh, okay I got my cars mixed up - I was thinking my N14SSS for 7500rpm, not R34 - which is 7000rpm redline :D

.. guessing r33 is the same?

1st 63kph

2nd 105kph

3rd 156kph

4th 203kph

5th 270kph

By my calculations using RB25DET Gbox/diff(4.111) in 3rd(1.302) with with 245/45/18's = 26.68" dia, = 167km/h @ 7,000rpm, which I did only 2 days ago

But that wasn't my point, the point is if you want to feel the boost, 3rd gear goes high *enough* that you can safely go down into it when on the highway

By my calculations using RB25DET Gbox/diff(4.111) in 3rd(1.302) with with 245/45/18's = 26.68" dia, = 167km/h @ 7,000rpm, which I did only 2 days ago

But that wasn't my point, the point is if you want to feel the boost, 3rd gear goes high *enough* that you can safely go down into it when on the highway

Ahhh that'd do it .. 245/45/18 is *huge*. I'd highly doubt that's a legal fitment, speedo would be nearly 7% out... AFAIK you're only allowed a 10mm diameter increase without it getting engineered (and requirement to get speedo recalibrated).

225/45/17 = 634.3mm diameter (1992.7mm circ)

vs

245/45/18 = 677.7mm diameter (2129.1mm circ)

... Which would explain why the speedo is reading 167kph :D ... You're actually only doing 156kph (107% of 156kph = 167kph)

Ahhh that'd do it .. 245/45/18 is *huge*. I'd highly doubt that's a legal fitment, speedo would be nearly 7% out... AFAIK you're only allowed a 10mm diameter increase without it getting engineered (and requirement to get speedo recalibrated).

225/45/17 = 634.3mm diameter (1992.7mm circ)

vs

245/45/18 = 677.7mm diameter (2129.1mm circ)

... Which would explain why the speedo is reading 167kph :) ... You're actually only doing 156kph (107% of 156kph = 167kph)

If you had larger diameter tyres, it'd be the other way around. Your actual road speed will be higher than the displayed speed on the speedo.

If you had larger diameter tyres, it'd be the other way around. Your actual road speed will be higher than the displayed speed on the speedo.

D'oh! You're right!

I got it the wrong way around .. *confused* ..

.. so the speedo would *show* 156kph, but you're doing 167kph with that sorta circumference change - Well there goes that theory on what's going on!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...