Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gents.

One of my rear wheels (thats right, only one) is scrubbing on the guard when i've got people in the back seat.

I figure that it doesnt happen on the other side because it must have very slightly more negative camber.

Is it possible to adjust the rear camber at home, and if so, any tips?

Thanks in advance.

And before you suggest I head out to get a wheel alignment, im just after a quick temporary fix. Wheel alignment is coming soon along with new tyres.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/286428-how-to-adjust-rear-camber/
Share on other sites

don't do it at home... just stop putting people in the back, put them on the good side!

Check tyre pressures...

Think laterally. Is it really the camber, maybe it is a soft shock, shorter spring, the camber of the road, the weight of the people in the back and is it really the tyre and not some other noise.

Thanks Stephen.

It doesnt matter which side the people sit in. A "large" passenger in the front seat has the same effect.

Tyre pressures are OK.

Springs are the same on both side (aftermarket RSR Ti2000). Shocks are nismo s-tune. Both appear fine.

The scraping doesnt occur when I run the standard 18s. These 20"s are in a much more agressive offset.

The RHS appears that it could JUST BARELY tuck under the guard over bumps, where as the LHS looks like there is no chance. This is why I think I can dial in a tiny bit more neg camber on the LHS and it will be OK.

fender rolling is the only wat. what is your size on you wheels? the width play effect too. mine is 10.5 rear with 22+ offset and 275 tyre scrub with passenger as well. fix the scrubbing by fender rolling.

Perhaps your diff and rear axle (bushes) are kicked to one side slightly.

Should be absolutely central unless it has taken a knock. Would still suggest that you take it to a professional. Maybe you could take some measurements first and see how much it is.

Use some straight edges on the face of the wheel and see where the guard sits...

Seems very odd, unless something is installed incorrectly.

If there is 'No Chance' that the wheel will clear on the left, I would have thought you will not get enough adjustment by just negative camber adjustment. Not sure you can use much more than 1 degree negative and it is a dangerous not doing it correctly.

Pick up a copy of High Performance Imports Issue 110 (High Performance) and take a look in the handling pages.

The maximum -camber is not a large figure

fender rolling is the only wat. what is your size on you wheels? the width play effect too. mine is 10.5 rear with 22+ offset and 275 tyre scrub with passenger as well. fix the scrubbing by fender rolling.

Thanks.

Rears are 20x9.5 +22, wearing 275/30.

There is JUST enough room to get away with not rolling the guards. However, my plan is to eventually get it done once I fork out for some better rubber (and run less agressive camber).

Stephen, thanks again for the additional ideas.

I dont want to sound stubborn but it really is a camber issue.

I tried to take a photo of the underside of the guard but my photographing skills are sub-par. Once you see the black mark left by the tyre and how close it is to fitting underneath, it will make a lot more sense.

I dont have a protractor (ha ha) but it looks like even 0.5 of a degree may be all it will take.

In any case, with some help I discovered how to adjust the camber but we could not get enough leverage on the bolt. Will get it done tomorrow and report back.

I'm running 20 x 10.5 + 22 w/- 285's on the rear. Ive got stock camber, had the guards rolled slightly and no rubbing. There is no camber adjustment without going aftermarket and I can't see that being your problem. You must have a rear end alignment problem. Might be worth taking to a pro who can diagnose the issue and possibly fix it.

Edited by mosoto

I was going to ask if it was the left side rubbing when you take right hand turns, as the turn you take is a bigger arc, higher speed, weight shifts over a bit more..

The RHS appears that it could JUST BARELY tuck under the guard over bumps, where as the LHS looks like there is no chance. This is why I think I can dial in a tiny bit more neg camber on the LHS and it will be OK.

... but I guess not.

I'm running 20 x 10.5 + 22 w/- 285's on the rear. Ive got stock camber, had the guards rolled slightly and no rubbing. There is no camber adjustment without going aftermarket and I can't see that being your problem. You must have a rear end alignment problem. Might be worth taking to a pro who can diagnose the issue and possibly fix it.

I agree completely, especially with the idea that there is "no camber adjustment without going aftermarket".

Unless you have something different, most Nissan's do not have Camber adjustment as standard... I'll stand corrected but that is front or rear from my knowledge.

I agree completely, especially with the idea that there is "no camber adjustment without going aftermarket".

Unless you have something different, most Nissan's do not have Camber adjustment as standard... I'll stand corrected but that is front or rear from my knowledge.

They do actually but only to a very minimal degree. I had a wheel allignment done on my 35 months ago and rear cambers were corrected slightly. I Also remember my R34 had a little bit of camber correction done as well. It is very marginal but there is a small degree in there. Failing which most people get camber kits. I would not recommend you play with those adjustments but rather get it to a wheel allignment specialist.

Easy fix would be to roll the inner lip.

I personal gripe of mine is when people post incorrect info on public forums.

Camber IS adjustable on the rears from factory (via the eccentric bolt on the camber arms). The scope of adjustment is minimal but it is there. Toe can also be adjusted via the toe arm.

The fronts are another story.

Thread can be closed, my problem is solved. Thanks for listening.

I personal gripe of mine is when people post incorrect info on public forums.

Camber IS adjustable on the rears from factory (via the eccentric bolt on the camber arms). The scope of adjustment is minimal but it is there. Toe can also be adjusted via the toe arm.

The fronts are another story.

Thread can be closed, my problem is solved. Thanks for listening.

How did you solve your problem?

I personal gripe of mine is when people post incorrect info on public forums.

Camber IS adjustable on the rears from factory (via the eccentric bolt on the camber arms). The scope of adjustment is minimal but it is there. Toe can also be adjusted via the toe arm.

The fronts are another story.

Thread can be closed, my problem is solved. Thanks for listening.

The info was correct sir. The camber bolt is a very marginal adjustment and has no effect on any suspension arm angle other than stock. There certainly would not be enough adjustment on a lowered vehicle.

when you say "not enough adjustment" for a lowered vehicle, how many degrees / minutes can the stock camber bolt change camber?? +/-

Most cars I know of dont really have excessive camber changes even when slammed...usually aftermarket options are a last resort to actually dial more negative camber than what the factory bolt will allow.

The info was correct sir. The eccentric camber bolt has a very marginal adjustment and does not have enough "range" in order to return camber to stock with a lowered suspension.

edited to be more specific.

How did you solve your problem?

I was able to get the morning off work.

Stopped by the tyre factory. Surprise surprise, camber on the LHS was -0.5 something, RHS was -1.4 something.

A quick adjustment and the problem was FIXED. -1.5 or there abouts on both sides now and no scrubbing.

I was able to get the morning off work.

Stopped by the tyre factory. Surprise surprise, camber on the LHS was -0.5 something, RHS was -1.4 something.

A quick adjustment and the problem was FIXED. -1.5 or there abouts on both sides now and no scrubbing.

Cool, that was exactly what mine was corrected to -1.5 after I lowered it on 350z suspension.

The lower you go the more natural camber you will have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What do you mean?  In between the two I shared?  They're the same boost   This will be insane.   A mate has a GTSt with a 9:1 RB30/25 with Tomei 256 cams and a Borg S362SX-E that is already a beast from the basement but has a stock 5 speed and will probably get a ZF8 one day.  After the G35 900 RB26 setup I'd be lying if the topic of "Wtf would a divided G35 be like on this thing?" idea hadn't come up - you'd definitely want a wide boost control range setup with it, as even with the less responsive and potent S361 we're having to ramp boost in from very low levels in the early gears.
    • ZF8 is faster, wider ratio spread, better in every way. I do not dispute this. But I have brain damage and I want the feeling of shifting gears. To me the extra work is fun, but I daily an automatic and in the US like 90+% of cars are automatic so a manual transmission is an "exotic" experience. If I want an automatic I've driven an F80 M3 with DCT more than a few times and it's incredibly capable but it's emotionally vacant to me.
    • Different folks for different folks I guess - for me, the 6MT > ZF8 claim is wild.  If I had a manual Skyline I'd be saving up fix that with a ZF8.  I went for a M135i, has the N55 which resolves a lot of the issues the N54 has, it already has the ZF8, is barely heavier than an R34 GTt, full boost before 2000rpm while also being real-word-faster than my old 280kw @ hubs R33 GTS25t and doing absolutely everything better.  There's nothing I'd change on it to be more like my old Skyline, tbh... it doesn't sound the same but it's got it's own awesome sound - definitely not worse.   To be fair I can't argue with most of those points.  I guess i was pointing it out as a comparison for a Skyline GTR and it's much closer all around there, like the weight difference between an M240i and an R34 GT-R isn't that much etc.   As above, I ended up getting an M135i which is in the 1400kg range - the M140 and M240is that you can get up till 2018 are B58, ZF8, RWD and in the 1400kg range which is a bit of fun... but doesn't fit the tyre etc of the Supra.  They are a run drive, though- maybe no an A90 Supra but a huge upgrade over a Skyline "sporty chassis" wise.    
    • Im loving this thread. I have a g35/900 t4 split 1.00 ar going on my rb30/25 with 9:1 and 264 cams. its drive by wire and with vct i think it should spool nicely. I have the 8speed gearbox on the floor ready to go on so full boost changes will be a thing if the tyres can deal with it. it should always be on boost
    • The trouble for me is the automatic takes away so much from it. And the E92 has hydraulic power steering. Even after putting in an LSD you're looking at re-mapping the xDrive to be more like a Skyline which is just a lot of effort for something that is supposed to be easier and cheaper. I consider the E92 335i 6MT to basically be the obviously superior car to something like an R34 GTT. Half the price out here, the N54 makes so much more power so easily, is a far more refined car, etc. You do have to deal with the nightmare of the N54's foibles vs the B58 which is comparatively miles better and if a turbo does fail it's only one of them vs two and a lot less pipe spaghetti.  996 or 997 Turbo has the AWD system mapped like a Skyline. Basically always RWD unless engaging the front axle makes sense. A coworker let me drive his 997.2 Turbo 6MT and it's absolutely tremendous. I don't think I'd want more power in a street car.
×
×
  • Create New...