Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone know how you should set your cars wheel alignment up for track racing? I cannot just take my car to a place to get a wheel alignment done here and say "i want to track race it" i need to get the settings on paper and tell them how i want it setup.

want to change it for track racing and for drag racing. anyone have any ideas ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/286694-r33-gtst-wheel-alignment/
Share on other sites

Yes you can. Any shop who is worth there money will be able to recomend settings for track, daily use etc. What style of track racing are u intending? drift, circuit, drag? I assume your new to the track, so id recomend something rather Nuetral and go from there to suit ur driving.

Yes you can. Any shop who is worth there money will be able to recomend settings for track, daily use etc. What style of track racing are u intending? drift, circuit, drag? I assume your new to the track, so id recomend something rather Nuetral and go from there to suit ur driving.

Dude, I am not in Australia anymore. I cannot go to the wheel alignment place and ask them for a track setup. they have no idea about these things. I need some settings to give to the guy and i need to over look to make sure they are correct.

This is a place where it took 2 weeks to find someone who has a timing light and even then it did not work the best.

can anyone help?

Dude, I am not in Australia anymore. I cannot go to the wheel alignment place and ask them for a track setup. they have no idea about these things. I need some settings to give to the guy and i need to over look to make sure they are correct.

This is a place where it took 2 weeks to find someone who has a timing light and even then it did not work the best.

can anyone help?

if you need a timing light i can send you one over.

what's adjustable in the suspenions (ie have you put in any adjustable bushes or arms in it, or just standard sutff?)

assuming you can only adjust toe, try 1-2mm out each side on the front (helps turn in to corners) and 0 to -1mm (in) on the rear for stability under brakes. If you can adjust camber front and rear you would be looking for 2-3o camber on the front and 1.5-2o camber on the rear. if you can adjust camber take as much as you can get 5o+

also depends on what spring rates you have, what sway bars, which tyres you are using, and which track it is for.

yep should be OK. run heaps of castor 5-7o. As you lower the ride height on the coilovers you will get more camber so to some extent you can use that. but generally you the ride height people use (355mm front to middle of wheel, 345mm rear to middle of wheel) means you have too much camber not too little.

also since you have coilovers it is worth getting the car corner weighted and get the ride heights set properly then.

These are my current settings for qld raceway.

ride height is 145 mil wheel centre to guard all round

front... 8 degrees castor. 1.4 mil toe out, 4 degrees camber

rear... .5 mil toe in, 1.5 degree camber

Set your ride height before you adjust anything. adjusting ride height after you,ve made adjustments will alter some of them.

From my limited experience I can say that nothing is set in stone so keep reading the feedback your arse dyno and the tyres give you and adjust accordingly. Little bits at a time.

ride height is 145 mil wheel centre to guard all round

Surely 345 mm :)

Don't you find excessive corner exit oversteer with 20 mm of rake?

For us the range is usually 5mm to 15mm, 20 mm improves the turn in a bit but the sacrifice in corner exit speed is too great.

That's why we run 355 front and 345 rear, it gives that 10 mm rake.

Is that why you have so much toe in on the rear (5 mm each side), to compensate for the 20 mm rake?

Cheers

Gary

Surely 345 mm :blush:

Don't you find excessive corner exit oversteer with 20 mm of rake?

For us the range is usually 5mm to 15mm, 20 mm improves the turn in a bit but the sacrifice in corner exit speed is too great.

That's why we run 355 front and 345 rear, it gives that 10 mm rake.

Is that why you have so much toe in on the rear (5 mm each side), to compensate for the 20 mm rake?

Cheers

Gary

Typo. I meant 345 mil ride height and the rear toe is .5 as in half a mil.

I would kill for oversteer. Very little i do afffects the understeer that has always been so prevelant in my car. I can power oversteer my way through it but that is not the desired method.

As a last resort I am going to set the swaybars to absolute extreme opposite ends ends of the spectrum to see what effect it has.

I would kill for oversteer. Very little i do afffects the understeer that has always been so prevelant in my car.

aint that the truth. understeer and more understeer is all I've ever had

oversteer is in there somewhere but requires real abuse to make it happen.....heavy foot, deliberate steering input, locking rear brakes or rear toe out

  • 1 month later...

rear factory camber can be adjusted without the need for aftermarket arms or offset bushing

front camber is fixed can't be factory adjusted without offset bushing or arms

well these are my settings for day to day use and other shet.

front

toe out 0.5mm each side

castor is 7.5 degrees with offset SuperPro bushing

camber is 1.6 degrees neg due to height and is unadjustable, will increase neg camber soon with SuperPro bushing

rear

toe in 0.5mm each side

camber 1.8 degrees neg maxed out factory setting, wanted less neg camber ordering SuperPro bushing soon

I think that's a reasonable setup for everyday use, some track, and drag, ideally less negative camber on the rear is better for drag, but on the track more camber at the front would be better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...