Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I got a little curious about this, and had a few parts off so decided to weigh them on some digital scales. Now you see all these drag or race cars with absolutely everything stripped

off them. When I look at what I have measured, and thought about it, was curious as to exactly how much they were saving.

So here are the things I have weighed so far to try and get imperical about it all. This is for a 33, I assume there will be subtle differences for 32 and 34. If people have weighed these items off their cars, add them to this thread and I'll add a 32 section, etc.

33 GTS-T (series1)

========

Mirrors: 2kg x 2 = 4kg

Front Door trims: 2.5kg each x 2 = 5kg

Standard "Space Saver" spare: 14kg

Standard boot "floor" (although I have made a custom MDF floor): 2.5kg

Stock Bonnet: 18kg

Front guards - 3kg x 2 = 6kg

Whole dash structure = 7kg

Centre console = 4kg

Glovebox assembly = 2kg

Stereo equipment:

Standard amp: ~2.5kg (of course this can vary a bit)

Pair of speakers: 2kg x 2 (front+back) = 4kg

12" dual coil sub in standard sized box = 13.5kg

Extras you might carry:

Toolbox filled with misc tools: 9.5kg

Person: 70kg+(!!) get rid of them :P

Some estimates based on previous pullings out:

Rear seat: 18kg

Front seat: 18Kg

R32 (series1)

=========

Stock GTS-T bonnet: 20kg

Aircon compressor: 9kg

Rear wiper motor: 2kg

Stock intercooler: 4kg

I assume the majority of savings will come from seat removals (maybe 60kg in those items), light weight wheels (maybe 40kg?), aircon (20kg?), removal of "excessive" bodykit (30kg?) items and maybe c/f bonnet (10kg difference?). So if anybody can put up figures for them, would be great.

So well I hope this thread where people pulling various bits off their cars can put them up in this thread, and we can get a bit of a definitive guide for those looking for weight reduction savings for the drag strip, or anything else.

Unfortunately I have never been on a weigh bridge and been able to measure the weight of my 33, so its difficult to see where I'm actually startng from, but this is a start.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/
Share on other sites

i think the bonnet(standard-> FRP/carbon) with save u 10kg.

Light weight rims with save u a few kg EACH! from just changing the stock to TE37, u save over 1xkg and handle a lot better!

and those preformance parts, light weight flywheel, forgre piston... anything under the engine bay is reducing weight. it's always the best to reduce weight from the front part.

recently i remove my FMIC and put the stock back, and i found the the car handling was improve. So anyone with is looking for a FMIC may look if there is any aluminum intercooler +pipe then buy cheap heavy cooler and mild steel pipe.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592599
Share on other sites

Originally posted by predator

I was trying to keep this to *serious* discussion about the issue and what is actually worth the effort to remove.. so can we please try and keep it that way? thanks.

Wasn't trying to make a joke about it. I actually thought this would back your statement about weight saving & if you read the article they highlight the gains by removal of differencent parts.

Fair enough the story a bit on the light side, but I & may be others dont really understand the true benefits of weight reduction, & most think Horsepower Gain is priority above all else.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592608
Share on other sites

first, remove all the stickers. :)

Things to consider:

- the spare tyre

- back seats

- swap the driver and passenger seats with some semi-buckets and/or buckets (e.g bride brix on driver's, bride ergo's on passenger)

- remove unnecessary boom boxes in da hood

- steering wheel, swapped to something lighter. momo, buddy club, etc.

- air conditioner

- swap to light weight materials if you must, i.e. alloy, carbon fibre, aluminium materials.

that's about all i can think of right now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592674
Share on other sites

Fair enough the story a bit on the light side, but I & may be others dont really understand the true benefits of weight reduction, & most think Horsepower Gain is priority above all else.

Yer, i know it does have its more serious points. But plenty of threads have been dedicated to that site. No hard feelings

If a 100kg weight reduction gives you an equivelent 20-30rwkw (i think that was a figure that has been thrown around), seems like a cheaper way to get better performance. If that 20-30rwkw costs you $200+ to get via horsepower, seems a bit silly when you can get rid of (or upgrade some items).

Bonnet reduction seems a little less than I would have thought. Feeling a carbon fibre bonnet and easily being able to lift in my hands, compared to a hefty lift of a normal bonnet. Would thing it would be more than 10kg? Anyhow, that is why i'm asking people if they have stuff off to measure it. Only takes a minute Thats the only way to tell for sure :)

I mean you don't want to get excessive unless you truly are building a drag car, but every bit helps. I know after measuring some things for example, I'd rather keep the door trims than a few other items on that list.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592713
Share on other sites

If a 100kg weight reduction gives you an equivelent 20-30rwkw (i think that was a figure that has been thrown around), seems like a cheaper way to get better performance. If that 20-30rwkw costs you $200+ to get via horsepower, seems a bit silly when you can get rid of (or upgrade some items).

I'm trying to do the numbers & the cost to lose 100kg=*20-30kw gain doesn't add up when compared to common performance upgrades eg: Exhaust, cam gears, ECU, bleed valves...etc A True Carbon bonnets must be worth around $2K+ fake fibreglass ones around $1K.

Things I can think of would be:

1. Titanium Cat back exhausts

2. I generally find Manufacturers add a lot of fancy covers, slicencer & protectors to the exhaust under-carriage. Either replacing the front half of the system or if possible removng these items.

3. Wonder what all your stereo system would way.. speakers, amps, subbies, CD Changer, deck...etc

4. I'm not sure if this is true, that each litre of liquid eg: fuel, water =1kg. If correct, then I would drive around with a minimum of fuel maybe qtr tank = saving of 40-50kg. Empty the water bottle for the window washer saving 3-5 kg.

If keeping the cars looks & driving comfort isn't an issue then I would also add things like:

1. Carpets, door trims & sound deadning

2. All the crappy pieces of plastic under the guards, the under carriage, rear boot...etc

3. Spoilers, side skirts, maybe even replacing the side glass windows with that plastic stuff??

I'd assume with no real knowledge at a 50-75kg weight reduction.

Overall I still think, lighter parts = more $$$cost than simple performance upgrades. :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592887
Share on other sites

recently i remove my FMIC and put the stock back, and i found the the car handling was improve.

Im amazed you can pick a difference!

I remove the back seats ond parcel shelp when i go to the track, not becasue of weight but so i can mount a camera on the parcel shelf.

The back seats are very light and combined with the parcel shelf i think they would struggle to make a 15kg difference. When i had the driver/passenger seat out for stereo install, they seemed to weigh quite a bit, so some decent lightweight seats could save 20-30kgs.

If i had a R32 GTST track car i think you would be able to get close to 1000kg without driver, going to the extent of removing std fuel cell and rear boot floor and replacing with smaller fuel cell with aluminiu or carbon fibre floor etc, etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592901
Share on other sites

I'm trying to do the numbers & the cost to lose 100kg=*20-30kw gain doesn't add up when compared to common performance upgrades eg: Exhaust' date=' cam gears, ECU, bleed valves...etc A True Carbon bonnets must be worth around $2K+ fake fibreglass ones around $1K.

QUOTE']

those are dry carbon, my friend bought a Nismo one R34GTR for a$4000 plus. we can't say 1K one is fake as that was FRP with a layer of true carbon fibre on top. The different as not as hard, yellow color and small crack after years (heat of engine) . But weight are pretty much same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-592973
Share on other sites

R33

Stock bonnet 18Kg

UAS Carbon bonnet 10Kg

Stock front seat 18Kg ( My Recaro is quite a bit heavier)

combined rear sear 18Kg

You don't save much over the stock wheels/205's if you have much bigger lightweights

I have Weds sports racing 18x8&9 with 235 40and 265 35 overall saving is about 0.5Kg. About the same for my Modena 2's 17x8.5&9.5 with 245 40 and 265 35

Turbo is quite heavy....you could save a few Kilos there ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-593062
Share on other sites

Hi guys, completely removing the HICAS saved 18 kgs on our R32 GTST.

Ohh and I always make the drivers take a peee before they race, every little bit helps.

lol, no doubt they are so nervous they can't help it.

I'm currently building a car for production car racing, I'll try and get some before and after weights

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-594995
Share on other sites

I only ever burn 1 song to a CD when im out driving my car. The additional weight of those extra 19 songs is astonishing.

Oh and use the blank CD's from Strathfields too. . . they are made from a thinner plastic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28670-weight-reduction/#findComment-595039
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...