Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive have a black sticker on my engine bay with '100,000k service' writen on it, does this mean that the 100,00k is the next service that needs to be done or does it mean it has had its 100,00k service done?

Its got 85k on the clock, legit or not who knows.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287338-100000k-service-sticker/
Share on other sites

Does it have details written on the sticker or is it just a white sticker sitting on the timing belt cover or the thermo fan cover?

no details, its a black small sticker just sitting there with 100,000k service, not sure if its on the timming belt cover or not tho.

Check where it's located because if it's on the timing belt cover or the sticker has a timing belt symbol on it then it's saying that the timing belt should be changed at 100,000km. I believe it is placed there at factory as mine had done 92,000km when I bought her and I have that sticker too.

Check where it's located because if it's on the timing belt cover or the sticker has a timing belt symbol on it then it's saying that the timing belt should be changed at 100,000km. I believe it is placed there at factory as mine had done 92,000km when I bought her and I have that sticker too.

if its on your timing belt cover, then they are telling u to change it at 100k's, which you should anyway..

apparently mine had its 100k service just before i bought it and my sticker is in my timing belt cover and has 200,XXX written on it does this mean i dont have to change it again till that amount of kms?

I have that as well. On my timing belt sticker it has 200,000 km written in pen in the blank section. Does that mean the belt was changed at 200,000km or is it telling me that the next belt change is at 200,000km?

If its the former... that means my car is clocking up over 300,000km already... :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...