Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Team,

I have been waiting for a while for my size semi slicks, but nothing yet, I now have 10-20% tread left and I need tyres before my next sprint round.

So my question is, I know I'll be losing 20mm of track - but overall, how would it effect my handling? is it going to be different in anyway, shape or form??

do I just wait and hope my supplier can get the 205's before mid October (50% chance!!) or take the gamble and get the 195's ?

(this is for my mx5, not a skyline too :O )

Cheers,

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/288695-tyre-width-noticable-difference/
Share on other sites

You won't lose any "track" - that is controlled by the wheel design, specifically the offset.

So I doubt you'll notice much difference at all in handling with 10mm less rubber width.

yeah unlikely you will notice the difference. and for sure a good tyre 10mm narrower will still handle better than a wider, worserer tyre.

in fact for supersprints you may find it improves times as they will come up to temp a little quicker, and may not go off with a short run

Give hornibrook tyres a call and see if they can get your size.

I recently picked up some new re55's for 380 a corner inc shipping, which isn't far off the 340 i paid for r888's at taleb last time.

I'm not sure if the pricing was specific to the size i bought but it's worth a shot regardless.

if you were to be using the same compound tyre etc, but 10mm skinnier then there is going to be a difference on performance. and it won't always be bad, but there will be some negatives. overall you are losing 40mm of tyre (assuming you need the tyres for both front and rear). which is nearly 5%

negatives of skinnier tyres:

less traction off the line

less grip when cornering and braking

go off quicker

positives of skinnier tyres:

less rolling resistance (faster acceleration once traction is no longer an issue and higher top speed)

lighter (again, faster acceleration) (yes i know that the weight difference will be minimal but every little bit helps in a race)

come up to temp quicker (so more grip earlier)

Hi everyone.

Was about to post a similar question but hope it's ok if I ask it here. :thumbsup:

Im looking at a set of 18" rims, 8.5 front, 9.5 rear, that come with tyres 245/40 front, 275/40 rear.

I understand that to fit in my guards I have to look at getting smaller tyres, 225/40 front, 245/40 rear. The tyres I'm looking at don't come in 245/40, only up to 235/40.

Would it be ok to get the 235/40 for the rear? I have an r32 gts-t 4door. I don't do any aggressive driving, mostly daily driving to work and highway kms as well.

Thanks for any help.

Kye

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...