Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys..

when i had the intake pipe removed and saw the dirt on the TB, i've decided that i wanted to clean it.. after removing the TB from the inlet manifold, i've also noticed oil/dirt inside the inlet manifold.. is this normal? is there a way of cleaning it?

can anyone explain this to me?.. im just a lil' worried..

i had rough idling before due to faulty coils but i've fixed that and replaced the spark plugs as well.. apart from that, the car is running fine..

tnx guys..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/289252-oildirt-in-inlet-manifold/
Share on other sites

ive had this before, also noticed mine when replacing coils and plugs, i also thought it was a worry but car runs mint, i asked around here and everyone said it was common/normal, although im still not sure why or how is gets there

tnx guys for your inputs..

i was lookin thru n/a section last nite and there was a similar issue with a guy who's got a 34.. if that was pretty normal then im at ease to know/for now..

as for your question Eug, i didnt replaced my intake pipe but i did attached a pod filter a couple of months after i got my car..

the hose running out of the top of the engine is feeding the intake oil and fumes. If you have a look at the stock air intake you would have seen a big empty box after your filter box, that was to catch the oil dripping out of the engine. If you replaced it with a straight through pipe you have now allowed it to be sucked straight into the manifold etc. Only way around it is to get an oil catch can.

i see.. i understand it now :) .. but wouldnt it be weird if i put an oil catch can in my n/a engine? i thought that oil catch cans are most useful for turbo/high performance cars?

is there a lot of sau members out there with an oil catch can in their n/a engine?

Some racetracks/events don't allow cars to compete if they don' have one because they don't want oil on the track. Hence why only turbo/high performance cars have them coz they are the ones that usually drive on the racetracks lol..

And i'm pretty sure oil and oil fumes would lower the octane rating of the fuel or something, and also restricting airflow through the manifold and hot air (oil fumes) would surely suck the engine of Horse power :)

Edited by R34 -_-
the hose running out of the top of the engine is feeding the intake oil and fumes. If you have a look at the stock air intake you would have seen a big empty box after your filter box, that was to catch the oil dripping out of the engine. If you replaced it with a straight through pipe you have now allowed it to be sucked straight into the manifold etc. Only way around it is to get an oil catch can.

Just to correct you there. The empty box you are refering to is a resonator which muffles intake noise as well as adds power to an n/a setup (I know it may seem wierd) - but it has nothing to do with catching oil.

Some n/a guys on this forum have used oil catch cans - but the advantages are quite small for a stock n/a. I was contemplating this idea but its not worth the cost unless you are really driving hard (on the track of course) or if you have a turbo setup.

:P for that info R34 -_- .. i'll look into that.. i might invest on one l8r down the road.. just currently replacing my rocker gasket and cleaning my aac valve (i think).. also cleaning the TB..

thank u again :)

no it doesn't i already answered the question before, it comes out of the one way valve sitting on the top of the engine, there's a black hose coming out of that valve that joins into your air intake pipe, the oil comes out of the valve and into the pipe, due to air flow it is sucked through the intake and into the combustion chamber where it is burnt and turned into exhaust gas.

case closed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...