Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nice work ian :D

I think with the tight headshots - it needs more fill and esp fill under the chin and nose. Guess you were just using normal flashes than strobes (so understandable). Just something i learnt from another photographer to do.

With the 3rd last shot the focus is on her nose rather than the eyes. Maybe you were going for that, but im not to sure. Just thought i mention it.

1st shot is great!!

Here's one I took last night (unedited) - I was taking shots of a small fire my cousin had built on his makeshift verandah, and the unexpected extended shutter opening made kind of a "wave"effect with the fire...

IMG_4253.jpg

Here's another one where the fire was burning through the middle of a termite-infested log - the camera didn't quite capture the blue flames that we could see, but meh...

IMG_4266.jpg

I had the dslr out on the weekend when i was out for a ride in the leaves here in Ottawa, Ontario. Canada. Nothing special, just my Stinky with some mods. I've only had my 450D for a few weeks now and haven't really experimented with it too much. Any tips or criticism is welcome!

4007681520_2da86e0f77.jpg

4007682734_c98e0c7348.jpg

7529_154604093755_504263755_2600498_2399118_n.jpg

7529_154604198755_504263755_2600513_2441916_n.jpg

7529_154604213755_504263755_2600514_2123049_n.jpg

First pana attempt

4009627396_290e041aef_b.jpg

Kyle.

Edited by Lv2exlr8

First of all Kyle - cool bike!

Secondly - as for tips/criticism - I'm no pro so don't take this too heart but IMO:

1st one is a bit under exposed/dark, and plant in foreground is a little distracting

I like the 2nd one!

bottom three pics: colours are a bit too intense I think

5th one: whats the smudge? rain drop on lens?

like the pano

here is a hint for anyone doing panoramas,

shoot it portrait instead of landscape, you have more room for error (top and bottom), plus you get a larger picture size once you stitch them all up........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...