Jump to content
SAU Community

Turbonetics Gtk Series


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what engine i can pull up some runs for you. I have heard mixed results on reliabilty but thats the case with everything i suppose. I think ive had 3 or 4 through two on sr's and they were pretty good for top end power but i remmber the sr20 one with gtk550 made 380rwkw but hit boost at 5800 or something stupid....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the T in GTK might be worth a closer look at the turbine and compressor wheels , T series stuff is getting a little long in the tooth for many true petrol performance apps .

I would have thought that something from the Garrett GT ball bearing range would be better for a two litre four - even a big bore one .

What sort of power are you looking to crank out of your engine ?

A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the way I'm leaning at the moment, but it was just a thought that crossed my mind and I'm interested in finding out about all options prior to making a decision.

At the moment the main contender is a Twin scroll 3071R/3076R kit, T67 8cm or a Tial housed 3071/6 on a steam pipe manifold. The car is a circuit car, so I'm looking for a wide power band and potential to make at least 300rwkw's (have to make it worth my while going from the HKS T300 on it now).

Dane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you could throw a TDO6 L2 in the list of potential turbos too for your power output.

Although I do like the twin scroll turbo setups as they exhibit a more linear power curve than some turbo seups which will potentially result in a faster circuit car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't reckon 300Kw is a bit much from a 2L based four for track ? I'd be concerned that the power would be peaky and the usable rev range a bit narrow for most circuits .

Not cheap but have you considered a GT2835 Pro S turbo ? The cropped GT30 turbine is fine as long as its in a GT30 based turbine housing which unfortunately only HKS make . Actually if you could rat up a T3 flanged Po S turbine housing the cartridge HKS uses can be bought through Garrett and on a four cylinder it shouldn't surge so possibly don't need HKS's compressor housing either .

Anyway your call but you need to have power out of the slowest parts of the track as as wide a usable rev range as possible . Also peaky short power ranges force you to use expensive close ratio gear sets to stay on the boil .

Controllable usable power you can get to the ground , better I think than a high peak number .

Cheers A .

Also you call but I wouldn't use anything less than the early head and the GTiR quad throttles , throttle response and least restriction throttling is everything for track .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tets: Thanks, will see how I go mate.

Disco: Thanks for the tips. I'm not necessarily after 300rwkw's straight up, but to be honest with the money I've spent on this car I want to have a window to increase power to a level that makes the build worth my while. I was running 240rwkw's for years on the stock engine, and I don't believe a 20-30rwkw gain is not enough for me to bother changing setups. At the moment it's ramping up to power in the mid 3's, and so long as I have a 3500rpm band of power that's fine. I'd prefer a 4000rpm window ideally. I do know what you mean though, and on my current turbo setup with the stock bottom end I was caught between gears at Winton quite a lot.

I'm going to be trying my T300 out initially to see how it goes (hasn't had a full tune yet due to a few issues), but if I'm unhappy with it I want to move quite quickly on a new setup to take advantage of the good state of our dollar. Throttle response with the CPC plenum and 80mm TB seems fine for the moment, and it's an S13 head. Throttle response is the main reason I'm thinking of going the Full race twin scroll setup.

To help understand my thinking, the reason I'm contemplating this prior to tuning the current setup is because my HKS SS manifold can't take the heat of the track, and has cracked a few times. Therefore I need to purchase a new steam pipe manifold, and don't want to do this for a setup that I may want to change shortly. So best for me to work it out and only purchase what I really want, as I've spent money on turbo setups over the years!

Thanks for the 2835 suggestion too. The Pro S is internally gates isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't reckon 300Kw is a bit much from a 2L based four for track ? I'd be concerned that the power would be peaky and the usable rev range a bit narrow for most circuits .

Disco, the Evo that took out the last Super Lap had something like 550rwhp - OK I realise its 4wd - but who would of thought a TO4Z strapped to an Evo motor would be a force on a circuit and actually bettered Mark Berry's new R34 by about a second from memory .....ahh yes the EVO had a Full-Race twin scroll manifold tho'.

Also Dane's is stroked to 2.2.

Edited by juggernaut1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was going to get a gtk. but through hours of searching on the net in the us, i didnt get one.

seems the fancy comp housing and relativly small exhaust housings are a restriction,

something in the reigon of 60-65mm inducer will do.

its either garrett or borg-warner/bullseye

ive had a thrust bearing go on a tdo6 not sure how much stronger the l2 version is but.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave.

Full race are going to be testing out the Borgwarner twin scroll turbo's soon enough I think, which is another option right at the top of my list. Just not sure when the results will be available though, but may be worth the wait from what I'm told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I read the GT35 vs BW the other day and it's pretty promising. They're also a fair whack cheaper than the Garret stuff, and seem to work as well if not better in a lot of cases.

This is the turbo that might be looking like a bit of a winner according to Full Race:

post-8405-1255671853_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

L2 is good for 300rwkw on a track weapon no worries at about 20psi.

Here is the GTK550 @ 25psi (this is the only graph i have on this computer) this is about 40rwkw shy of its potential because the fuel system was not adequate so i had to dumb it down. I reckon its the worst turbo i've seen on a sr to date :devil: but on a rb26/30 id be happy.

post-34927-1255677269_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1255677284_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

L2 graphs on 2 liter, only ran it to 7300 as engine was only a hour old and the box was noisy (std sr box0, should make power to 8200.

18psi 272deg cams big lift, engine built by us.

We should be able to crank up the boost in the next few weeks, i predict 340-355rwkw ish at 1.5 on pulp.

post-34927-1255678057_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1255678256_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

L2 on std SR20 with HKS 264 in and ex, std valve springs, ikeya formula 4 tb plenum.

300rwkw on a fairly "fat" tune (less timing and 11.8afr) as engine was std. i would expect to see another 20rwkw easy in that car at the same boost, cams were a bit small too.. and springs were borderline rpm wise.

post-34927-1255678475_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1255678498_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got some bad news unfortunately.  Turns out the car has some serious chassis damage and failed a structural report, which was needed because of a failed roadworthy.   I'm now sitting here wondering wtf I'm supposed to do with a car that I can't register and needs serious body work. 😓 Seriously feeling lost, ripped off and depressed over this. 
    • FYI if interested  Brake rotors got taken down to 389mm for clearance and all things adjusted accordingly #bolton Had a quick retune of the retune to change the VCT window plus some of this and that Took 7 weeks for me to get a barrell of fuel to run my car on the track = W.A Actually attempted to drive this thing on the track after 6 months when this shouldve really been 3 monthly ago Only a few laps - stuff didnt go right because electronic aids in the car mean you drive it a certain way when its indicated they are on and they are actually not things dont go great quickly - car fixed and refreshed + thats been fixed with additional warnings and other thing built in now Noted - even mucking around at prob 60 - 70% the aero was now hitting the ground where it hadnt previously at 100% plus the balance of the car is improved - hence without shock pots etc etc you can tell the new aero additions have done something reasonably significant Suspension out - change the bumps and some packers  Tried to go out again - lightning and thunder storms / rain in Perth for the  first time in 50 years for the hour I had - didnt get out V8SC are now here so no track time at Barbs for many weeks - an going to try go down to our other track a few hours away and try to get in the seat Got the below as a pressie recently - yes I dont mind the odd lego + this is very good I think and if not into lego even can appreciate someones craftmanship of this level  
    • ok will do, cheers guys build thread on M35 Stagea Tuner Facebook group here if you can't wait. 
    • look up "kota the yota" on youtube he runs an export business to the us and specialises in r34's
    • I understand that the R34 ECU can be sensitive to what is going on wrt the coilpacks/loom. You'd be well advised to put a Consult reader onto the diagnostic port and read the codes. The one(s) in the ECU will be the ones most likely to tell you what's going on. The TCS light will be a secondary effect.
×
×
  • Create New...