Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

^

Sif, my 260+ is working perferctly fine with win 7 64bit.

Did you install the driver yourself or did u let windows update do it?

EDIT: & yes I realise that I can't spell for crap, on a side note, how do I turn on the spell check in IE8? Hasn't worked eversince I updated to 7.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

I have Windows 7 Ultimate x64 and I love it.

I have been using W7 since the Release Candidate.

Only thing I don't like is Paint. They tried to be jazz it up a little bit, add some crappy new shapes and patterns. Lame complaint I know.

You suck ash...

still haven't sorted out the audio. Flash videos are playing really choppy too... I might try doing a repair on Windows... I'm sure my f**king around with shit has farked something up...

Anyone gimme thoughts on 260 card was going to get XFX......210 at msy

Bought a 4350 card to get my bluray working on the cheap and its a POS......

dropped my user rating from 5.9 to 3.7......JUNK compared to my old 7600gt....

Edited by faggywaggy

Windows user rating means fk all mate.

A 4350 should play 1080p without a problem. Could be a CPU load issue you are having.

Are you using the latest ATi drivers and K-Lite codec packs?

late reply... windows told me it found the current drivers for my card, but i found the latest drivers myself, my card is a 285. a friend of mine has the 295 and its has the same issues. in MW2. tried every different driver i could find.

so ill have to live with 2x AA i guess......or go back to XP, but i really couldnt be bothered, still looks shiny

Edited by boiracer
  • 2 weeks later...

have been using windows 7 enterprise on one of those netbooks and its been going alright, startup takes a fair bit to load though, no games or programs installed, most of the unneccasary processes/services have been disabled, not sure whats wrong but used to start up in about 10seconds when i first started using it now it takes about 1 minute

has only been used for word processing and internet browsing not downloading and has antivirus installed on it from day one

is it just the netbook itself or has anyone else experienced this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...