Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm going to throw this out from left field and suggest a brand new Hyundai Getz.

It won't pass your "not girly" requirements, but it ticks all the other boxes. It's light on fuel (official 6.1L/100km rating). It'll be new so no idiot's driven it into the ground, which will help with reliability (as will the warranty).

The car has the full plethora of safety features (ABS, ESP) which is good in a daily, especially if you let people who can't drive that well borrow it. The head unit plays MP3s off CD or a USB drive, and has a Bluetooth handsfree kit. Importantly, it has air con.

My girlfriend's work has one as a runabout. The seats are pretty hard and the plastics are bin-like, but aside from that its not that bad as something to just drive for a while and sell in a few years.

The other issue is that the 5 door RRPs at $15K drive away ($13K if you go 3 door), but you might be able to talk them down. It's above your $10K limit, but all the mod-cons and the lack of headaches from not being pre-abused by some idiot might offset that extra cost in your mind.

P.S. I don't work for Hyundai. :P

Getz_Brochure.pdf

Edited by scathing

a friend just bought a subaru liberty (2001, 2.5L engine, manual, ~140,000kms) for $12k. Fuel efficiency is decent if talking it easy but the best bit about is it's handling and with AWD, it grips quite well but the suspension is still conformable for a daily. plus, its no snail like most small cars, so can be a bit of fun at least compared to new corollas ect.

haven't been in many other cars that i would recommend buying for a daily :thumbsup:

^a friend owns an old hyundai excel, after driving it, i was happy im stuck with a VN.

Edited by Peter89

why are so many people recommending cars like mazdas that are so expensive to service? if you want a cheap to run daily the guy with the getz idea is on the money - however there's like 800 bucks gross profit in those cars so good luck getting a serious discount. a 3 or 4 k corolla is a great idea as they won't cost you anything to look after - and a later model magna tj for example is great value for money.

why are so many people recommending cars like mazdas that are so expensive to service? if you want a cheap to run daily the guy with the getz idea is on the money - however there's like 800 bucks gross profit in those cars so good luck getting a serious discount. a 3 or 4 k corolla is a great idea as they won't cost you anything to look after - and a later model magna tj for example is great value for money.

same goes for hondas, that and they look shit.

I was looking at a daily also, mainly just for going to station, and places where I would otherwise not park etc. I dont care what it looks like etc ONLY that it is cheap and has working a/c.

The best option I came up with was a Toyota Startlet... based on what they are selling for I could easily get one for $3k and being a 1.3 they sip petrol. That is for a car that is about 10 years old and has a drivers airbag, a/c and power steer.

Only thing that annoys me is paying 2 sets of rego and 2 sets of insurance and 2 sets of maintenance which would be about $1k a year for a starlet I would say.

Not too bad a price though for the added convienience

Edited by r32line

I bought a Swift GTi as a daily runabout.

Like you say, the 1.3L sips petrol and being so small its easy to park. Mine doesn't have air con but they did sell some that do.

It's also a shitload of fun to drive.

The reason I didn't suggest it is because its old and, being a "desirable" hot hatch, will come pre-thrashed.

Edited by scathing

SR NA Silvia, great on fuel and to smash around.

They hold their value aswell as so many p platers want them, I had one bought it for $5000 added a 2nd hand nissan aero kit (painted and fitted myself) kept it for 5 months sold it for $8500 in 2 weeks, no shit.

It was manual tho

Edited by Silvia GTR
actually, a TJ series magna would be the pick.

smooth 3.5l v6, better build quality than local products.

BUT, my bluebird is for sale! lol

the magnas are a local product and build quality isn't that great. not bad, but not great. no worse than any other aussie made car, but not better either.

also they aren't the most economical car either. they are quick in manual form though. i have owned 2 TH magnas. both 3.5L manuals. they are the same as a TJ, just different vody shape but built off the same platform (basically just different nose and tail) and they are ok cars. my second one ran a 14.8 at willowbank with just a catback exhaust. on the highway the economy is good. you can get around 8-9L/100kms pretty easily. round town though they are heavy on fuel. even babying it i was getting around 13L/100km. if you drive a bit harder that will jump up to 16L/100kms very quickly.

I would have suggested a N15 Pulsar SSS but they are a bit long in the tooth, and Nissan build quality isn't fantastic. They did come standard with everything you'd need in a daily (air con, power windows/mirrors) and the SR20DE isn't a bad motor. Any Nissan hatch after the N15 isn't even worth considering.

i have one of these and love it. build quality is good, no different to any other nissan (for example a skyline). they run cheap (on the highway i've had a best of 6.5L/100kms) and some spirited driving round town will see me at 12L/100kms as worst figures. generally just over 10l/100kms, but if i lived in a different area and was driving further to work (and doing less short trips on cold start enrichment) i would easily get under 10L/100kms. in fact towing a 3.6m tinny on the highway i still get under 10l/100kms.

i would highly recommend the n15 SSS. they are comfy to drive, go well, and even better with some mods (full exhaust, not just cat back. extractors make a big difference to the top end) and are economical, and much nicer to drive than a corolla or lancer, etc. the old girl has a base model 2000 model corolla and it is terrible to drive compare to the pulsar. it goes ok but is too soft in the suspension. lancers are the same. and you can pick some up with low kms on them still (under 100,000kms) which isn't bad for a 10 year old car.

i don't know if i'd go with a subaru. i've driven a 2.0L imprezza and a 2.5L liberty and while they go ok, i would still take the pulsar over them.

i have one of these and love it.

I used to have one. I loved it and it always ran without missing a beat, but the interior trim was very rattly and it was squeaking in a fair few places.

build quality is(...)no different to any other nissan

Yep, that's what I said. Pretty average build quality.

Most Nissans I've been in have rattled and squeaked, most straight off the dealership floor. The bits that make it stop, turn and go are generally bulletproof but everything else feels like its not quite firmly attached.

Those characteristics are fine in a fun sporty car, but not as desirable in a daily runabout.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...