Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

looks like usf1 is a fail http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5956816,00.html

and stephan gp are keen for an entry with all the ex toyota stuff, so keen they are shipping gear to the first gp hoping for a place on the grid

looks like usf1 is a fail http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5956816,00.html

and stephan gp are keen for an entry with all the ex toyota stuff, so keen they are shipping gear to the first gp hoping for a place on the grid

Stefan have actually shipped or are about to ship a container to the second round as well.

Must have some decent $$'s behind them if they're spending up without any indication if they'll be allowed to race.

Have they done any testing with the other teams?

Shame that if USF1 do pull out and Stefan GP do get the final two grid positions, is that teams like Lola and Prodrive missed out initially, and would have well and truly had a car ready for pre-season testing.

And, I hope they change the name of Stefan GP too, it's probably by far the worst name I've ever heard in the GP grid :down:

if i only went to exciting GP's, i'd never leave my house! Its all about going to Monaco, and im going to be in Barca and the sphincter of the universe anyway, might as well chuck in a few GP's and see what they're like over there

They cant be any more uneventful than the melbourne GP is every year. The only other 'have to' track is Spa, and that might happen next year

still not a massive fan of the looks, hopefully the finished product is a little more edgy

the noise tho, is very unexpected. You sort of think that it will have that empty sounding noise that ferrari's have and hopefully pump out more of the growly lambo sound... but no. Its almost like american muscle. sounds ace

im going to be in Barca and the sphincter of the universe anyway, might as well chuck in a few GP's and see what they're like over there

I reckon the viewing should be good in the sphincter of the universe, you should be able to choose a seat next to the only other spectator. Say hi to Bernie from all of us at SAU.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...