Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I like the latest relevations that not only SV's wing was broken but so was MW's. Allegedly it was repaired and then put on SV's car.

The next bit of stuff is that MW's tub is lighter than SV's one??? Interesting revelation since Luscious Liz was SV's old one....

Who is getting the advantage?? I can't separate spin from fact.

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well Mark weighs more then Seb so the team have said several times that they setup their cars in a similar way, have similar driving styles, but Mark is heavier and taller and that poses design problems.

I think all the cars are underweight by quite a margin, but on Marks car they dont get to ballast it up as much as they like

damn it... i thought i attached the blue ones?!

40284.jpg

im not a lebo

cant buy the first ones

Similar... rbr pumas.. the rbr logo is a bit different

http://www.eastbay.com/product/model:13798...EYWORD%20SEARCH

and use coupon code EMEBT798 for 20% off which is free shipping here pretty much

Monaco could get the axe? yeah... okay Bernie

I fucking dare you to do it. The publicity would be exactly what your looking for

As much of a challenge it is for the drivers, I'd be glad to see the dinosaur go.. It has no place in the modern game and its been admitted that F1 make a special exception for Monaco and that if they applied for it in the modern day they'd be flatly rejected because of safety. It is a processional bore that offers no excitement and has ended up being little more than a glorified fashion parade and party of the rich and famous.. A true reflection on the repugnant mutant F1 has become..

If you want heritage, then I'd be happy to see F1 stay at Monza, Spa and Silverstone! However, if F1 as a sport was so concerned about heritage and tradition, how could they have gone 3 years without a French GP? Now THAT is a travesty...

Monaco could get the axe? yeah... okay Bernie

I fucking dare you to do it. The publicity would be exactly what your looking for

Hahahahahaha ... oh, you're serious. Honestly, the guy needs a BS filter strapped to his mouth, but then everyone would wonder where he'd gone because they wouldn't be able to hear him any more.

Lawn tennis is outdated too but no one wants to put the axe into Wimbledon.

Where else can you see Kimi swim out to the 80 footer with bikini clad chicks?

It is all about Kimi's Bitches!

Haha i buy from them all the time.. and actually had the coupon code in clipboard when i saw your post.

Thanks guy. Ill be honest, i saw that site too, but i was undecided on the slight variations of colour

But your 20% nudge, tipped me over the edge... You appealed to the tightass in me!

As of this weekend's German GP, all radio communication between the pit wall and the drivers will be available for broadcasters to air.

Up until now, teams have had the ability to censor their communications, pressing a button that allows them to keep what is said between their drivers and the men on the pit wall away from prying ears.

However, the FIA have taken steps to stop that.

According to Auto, Moto und Sport, motorsport's governing body has taken advantage of a passage in the Sports Act, which states that radio traffic should be made available to all.

However, in a bid to ensure the more colourful drivers keep their swearing to themselves, there will be a short delay between the radio message being said and it being broadcast, allowing FIA race director Charlie Whiting to intervene.

Already, though, concerns have been raised with Mercedes GP team boss Ross Brawn revealing that it won't be long before teams start talking in code, leaving the viewing public with no clue as to what is actually going on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...