Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Very nice power curve, I see what you mean about it dropping slightly at the top. At least you have warning before you hit the rev limiter:)

INASNT, not too well with the exhaust manifold unfortuneately. Just doesnt seem to be enough exh gas velocity to bring the turbo on to boost early enough for my liking. I want to try a smaller housing, as with the 0.61 it hit 1 bar around 3000rpm, now its around 5,000 rpm. I dont think this is the fault of the turbine housing, as they are the recommended size for RB25 by HKS BUT they sell the kits with very short manifold runners, and a progressive collection of the gasses. Mine has long runers and a 6:1 configuration which is where I think the problems start.

Sly, sorry for the whoring:)

That's a nice power band, assuming it doesn't get much below 200 rwkw at 7,250 rpm that's an average from 4,250 to 7,250 rpm of 211 rwkw. Very nice, you gotta be happy with that. I have seen plenty of 260 rwkw cars that don't have a 211 rwkw average over a 3,000 rpm range.

Hi Simonster, you asked "what's the purpose of the 75%, 50% and 25% throttle opening graphs".

It is very rare that an engine will have even (linear) flow characteristics at partial throttle openings, less likely they will be the same as at WOT.  How often do you drive your car at WOT?  Nowhere near as often as you drive it with partial throttle openings.

This is particularly important on cars with MAP sensor driven ECU's, not such an issue on cars with AFM driven ECU's.  But still well worth checking.

It is so much quicker to tune a car only at WOT, after all you would need another 4 power runs to just check the partial throttle A/F ratios.  How many more you need to tune it is a factor of how good (experienced) the tuner is.

By asking for partial throttle A/F graphs you are telling the tuner that he has to do it all, not take short cuts.  The graphs are proof that he has done a complete job.

Hope that helps

PS; we always tune a car in the 1 to 1 gear, usually 4th.  That way we can easily compare the results, if you use different gear ratios you get slight differences which can mask changes after mods are made.  If we do something we want to know whether it is better or worse through out the whole RPM range, not just max power at one RPM point.

Thanks for the reply Sydneykid, maybe i'm a little naive but i thought tuners would spend more time tuning at partial openings as like you say, WOT is only one position.

Simonster' date=' dont want to swap your 0.73 for a 0.87 do you?:DQUOTE']

Hi Steve,

Actually, you are the reason I went for the 0.73 housing as I saw your post a few months ago re: 256kW@1 bar & 1bar by 3500rpm. I thought that was terrific response but in my limited knowlege may become a little "choked" near max rpm so I thought I'd go for the slightly larger ex housing.

I'm getting my manifold made in a few weeks and I definately won't be using long runners ;0 but was going to use 6-1 at the collector- maybe I'll re-think that now?

I didn't use any formulas or logic for going the 0.73, just a stab in the dark. I'm after response down low and more mid range than top end. I've forgotten, are you still using the standard engine?

My engine is a little more than "light tune"

do have a look at my threat on manifold design and turbine housing. I learnt an expensive lesson. The 6:1 collector 'seems' to be causing a bit too much turbulance and slowing down exhaust gas flow.

The japs, like HKS, use 3:2:1 then turbo, which is what I would highly recommend (pictures on the above thread) - alot of R&D, dont try and re-invent the wheel.

Serious, with the right manifold it will be killer.

The car made 230rwkw at 17psi (~1.2bar), in a 32 degree dyno cell.  

They tell me that for the ambient temperature, thats pretty good power.

They were also surprised to hear that im running a standard dump pipe!

Specs of the car:

bosch 044 fuel pump

extreme single plate clutch

Hybrid FMIC

Tomei fuel pressure reg with standard injectors

Turbosmart E-boost controller

Power FC

HKS GT2530

Standard cast dump with 3 inch exhaust

Nice!

Ive got a very similar setup. My high boost is set at somewhere between 10 and 11psi where it peaks at 270ish rwhp. I like this turbo a lot better than my high flowed R33 turbo. The car is pure pleasure to drive on even low boost (250ish rwhp @ 7psi)

Quick question, my AFR is very very constant according to my dyno graph but yours seems to be like a dogs breakfast. Is that because you dont have a Z32AFM as I do?

Sorry I cant post my graphs - they are sitting at work and I dont have a scanner.

PS. Merry Christmas and drive sensibly over the Christmas break!

yes guys ive driven it, im holding off the review as im hunting down a good split dump pipe, as the stock one is no good for this turbo!

Also we had to change a few boost signal lines to EBC to the correct tubing, as it was all thrown together at last minute- vaccuum hose and not pressure hose was used (that was all that was available in the middle of the night when it was fitted!!) so when it heated up, it swelled, and boost got sent off the dial (over 20psi)- i got a shock when i planted it in third on slightly damp road and nearly lost the back end!

the boost lines are now sorted, but the stock dump is so restrictive, apparently the wastegate is larger than the stock, and the stock dump has bugger all room for it, and you can hear/feel it. It comes on to boost real fast, then as the wastegate opens the exhaust note fully changes, the boost flutters a couple of psi, and you can just tell its not flowing properly.

As it was overboosting ive only been babying it around, and now im waiting for the dump. But it does spool very early and i think it hits 1.2bar in the 3k range, sorry i cant be too specific as yet as ive just been ironing out the bugs!

ill be back when its all done.

yes guys ive driven it, im holding off the review as im hunting down a good split dump pipe, as the stock one is no good for this turbo!

Also we had to change a few boost signal lines to EBC to the correct tubing, as it was all thrown together at last minute- vaccuum hose and not pressure hose was used (that was all that was available in the middle of the night when it was fitted!!) so when it heated up, it swelled, and boost got sent off the dial (over 20psi)- i got a shock when i planted it in third on slightly damp road and nearly lost the back end!

the boost lines are now sorted, but the stock dump is so restrictive, apparently the wastegate is larger than the stock, and the stock dump has bugger all room for it, and you can hear/feel it. It comes on to boost real fast, then as the wastegate opens the exhaust note fully changes, the boost flutters a couple of psi, and you can just tell its not flowing properly.

As it was overboosting ive only been babying it around, and now im waiting for the dump. But it does spool very early and i think it hits 1.2bar in the 3k range, sorry i cant be too specific as yet as ive just been ironing out the bugs!

ill be back when its all done.

Dump pipe came in today and is installed.

WHAT A DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The car is completely different to drive! Instantly noticable even from when you fire it up, as it seems a bit louder.

Boost comes on smooth and hard and zips to the redline.

The feeling of running out of puff up top is gone! I have only run just over 1bar so far, as im so busy with xmas stuff i dont have time to set up the e boost again, but it wont be long.

It will be back on the dyno asap, and it will be real interesting to see the difference.

Lesson learned: stock dump pipe just doesnt work with an HKS GT series turbo! i tried to get away with it to save some dollars, but it just didnt work. Boost couldnt be accurately controlled and wastegate was fully restricted.

Shane, ill check next time im out as to what duty cycle they are running.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...