Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

haha thanks. Yeah. I blame a mate of mine I've been shooting with, all he does is HDR's.. so instead of taking a few photos I like and then waiting for him to get his multi exposures of every shot he likes.. im just joining in on it haha

colours are a little over the top

as for the softness

I have a suggestion:

pick the single photo you like the most

copy and paste it twice

(now you should have three copies of the one file)

in photomatix open them for hdr

(it will detect that they have the same exp bias and offer you to set new ones)

just hit ok so it uses the default or 1/3

then do your hdr doing that

(you dont need to do any aligning as it was all the same photo so everything will line up perfectly)

thats not REALLY how you do HDR photos tho. that said, its a quick way of doing it with good results!

thats not REALLY how you do HDR photos tho. that said, its a quick way of doing it with good results!

technically if you're shooting in RAW mode on a DSL withover 12mpx, then you can adjust exposure digitally and still retain a fair bit of quality. Don't really see why you'd wanna do it that way, esp when DSLR's these days take a second to do multiple exposure stops.

technically if you're shooting in RAW mode on a DSL withover 12mpx, then you can adjust exposure digitally and still retain a fair bit of quality. Don't really see why you'd wanna do it that way, esp when DSLR's these days take a second to do multiple exposure stops.

because (a) some things move faster than 1 second (ie trees) and (b) some people don't have tripods

That's gotta be a piss-take, or someone who is rather over-confident, or REALLY has tickets on themselves!

He/She says he/she's only just got their camera, yet they've already developed a "speciality" and a "style?" WTF???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...