Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a turbo a gcg gt3076 with skyline rear housing on it think the time has come to upgrade the rear housing

has issues with boost controll etc and not making power up top

comes on boost realy well down low but then runs out of puff

was just woundering whats peoples idears on what rear housing options that are avaliable for this combo

thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302378-rb25det-neo-in-r32/
Share on other sites

The details off the turbos ID tag would help identify its turbine . AFAIK the GT3076R's were never made with the cropped or 56mm GT30 turbine .

Does it have a port shrouded compressor housing , usually the dead give away for a GT3076R/GT3037S .

Most , but not all , seem to like the genuine Garrett GT30 IW turbine housing in 0.82 A/R . Std the Neo had a larger turbine housing than the R33 GTS25T's and different cam profiles and VCT . In theory same bottom end and more top end from better breathing and a bit less exhaust housing restriction . I think the numbers were 184 Kw vs 209 for R33 and R34 RB25DET's .

A .

Edited by discopotato03
suggestion is simple

Use a Garrett .82 rear housing...?

go cut 4mm off your turbine and leave it in the same housing, see how it goes.

find out exactly what cartridge you have then find a housing to suit. you cant use a gt30 housing designed for a gt30 turbine if you have a cropped 56mm turbine.

go cut 4mm off your turbine and leave it in the same housing, see how it goes.

find out exactly what cartridge you have then find a housing to suit. you cant use a gt30 housing designed for a gt30 turbine if you have a cropped 56mm turbine.

Garrett I/w GT30's have the 56mm turbine. Only the External gate GT30's have the 60.3mm rear fan

only the bastardised ones with "bolt on" rear housings have cropped turbines. the proper gt30s with a proper IW housing have the 60mm turbine

Not according to GCG

http://gcg.com.au/turbo/ViewProduct.aspx?ProductID=191

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The team at OBD2 Australia are pretty good, shoot them an email and ask them. I've dealt with them before for work stuff. I'd be shocked if it didn't work, so long as Consult can activate the ABS. But you might need to use KLine for it which would be the stopper, as I don't think that piece does KLine comms.
    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
×
×
  • Create New...