Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I never said it was linear.

You know what the car losses through the drivetrain from factory.

Example, the old GTS HSV Monaro's. Rated at 300kw, make about 220-240kw@wheels.

Standard GTST, rated at 180 odd kw, make anywhere from 120-140kw@wheels.

So if the same GTST makes another 110kw@wheels to 250kw@wheels, we re-add that 60-40kw loss, so it pumps it up to 290-310kw@engine. However the engine is now producing more power, therefore everything is slightly increased in loss. This is the figure that can not be given by a percentage, or a fixed linear figure. It varies. I'm sure there would be a close equation you could do to work it out more accuretly. The more power you make, the higher the additional loss through friction, fluids, heat etc.

So in a bit of a maths equation.

kw@motor = kw@wheels + original factory loss (say 50kw to be a nice number) + 'unknown variable' (additional loss as power increases)

= 250kw@wheels + 50kw original loss + 'x'

= 300kw@motor + 'x'

This 'x' value is one that you have to guess logically. It aint going to be 100kw, it aint going to be .5kw. A good educated guess in this case could be 5kw. It will obviously slightly increase with the more power you are making. at 1000kw@motor it might be 50kw.

That is about as accurate as you can get with guessing, and for most people i think it is good enough to have that minium value and a little bit extra. I'd rather under qoute something than over qoute.

This logic makes sense when making a calculated estimate.

I like to know it due to conversation with people that aren't that into cars. Since most manufacturer's qoute engine HP figures and all modified car owners qoute @ wheel figures it makes discussions with people that aren't into cars difficult.

Classic case, talk to some one that bought a brand new HSV "My HSV makes 307kw, what does yours make" "My car makes 280kw@wheels" "....Haha my stock HSV has more power". Therefore if you are talking to some one, say your friends parents or something, i always use engine HP figures cause by the time i start explaining drive train losses they will tune out and the discussion will be over.

+1. but your problem is having that conversation with the HSV boofhead in the first place :(

I like to know it due to conversation with people that aren't that into cars. Since most manufacturer's qoute engine HP figures and all modified car owners qoute @ wheel figures it makes discussions with people that aren't into cars difficult.

Classic case, talk to some one that bought a brand new HSV "My HSV makes 307kw, what does yours make" "My car makes 280kw@wheels" "....Haha my stock HSV has more power". Therefore if you are talking to some one, say your friends parents or something, i always use engine HP figures cause by the time i start explaining drive train losses they will tune out and the discussion will be over.

then you line them up and their bullshit about how they missed 2nd gear starts.

you fight fire with fire when it comes to n00bs. 'wow, your type r has an exhaust and makes 180kw at the engine... awesome!! now see that charade over there? 100 bux says you cant beat it."

Well if you don't care why did you click on the thread and make a sexually frustrated comment?

lol thats cute, you obviously missed the point. but thats all good.. n00bs are allowed to do that around here.

Easy, pull the engine out of the car and put in on an engine dyno, then put the engine back in and put the car on a dyno, then you will know what the difference is. IF you have a money tree that is. guestimation is the only way

saying that tho no 2 cars are the same UNLESS they are both factory spec, even then there will be differences as nothing is perfect.

The main reason people use % figures are so they can over-inflate their flywheel HP for bragging rights. Hell i've had one monkey try and tell me that all cars lose the same amount of power through the gearbox, manual/auto/skyline/commodore/300zx. When, for fun, i asked him how much he thinks my car is making at the flywheel he says "oh around 150" because he thinks all cars lose 20kw or some such bullshit.

Hmm lets see, 300ZX NA's make 120rwkw when freshly rebuilt with good compression, thats at 165kw atf. One that hasn't been rebuilt will normally see about 110rwkw which is about right for wear and tear which would bring it down to 155kw atf roughly. Mine makes 131.4rwkw so taking into account that 45kw loss i'd be making 176.4kw atf, which isn't correct as i also have an Underdrive crank pulley which reduces powerloss through all the accessories from memory it added 7rwkw on the dyno, so: 131.4+45-7=169.4kw atf which i think sounds correct.

there is a youtube video of a "1000 hp" r32 (looks like dyno @ croydon).

it was logging 500 and something awkw

the explanation given by someone connected with the car in the comments was

that they took 180hp off the 1000hp "for the back wheels" and another 100

"for the front wheels" and the result was ~730hp at the wheels, making the

car 1000hp at the crank, (and a 25% drive train loss).

So goes to show you can say anything about crank hp you want. Pick a nice

round number then work out the explanation!

there is a youtube video of a "1000 hp" r32 (looks like dyno @ croydon).

it was logging 500 and something awkw

the explanation given by someone connected with the car in the comments was

that they took 180hp off the 1000hp "for the back wheels" and another 100

"for the front wheels" and the result was ~730hp at the wheels, making the

car 1000hp at the crank, (and a 25% drive train loss).

So goes to show you can say anything about crank hp you want. Pick a nice

round number then work out the explanation!

Was the engine from that car ever dynoed by itself?

If not, then the 1000hp is just speculation.

180hp loss to the back wheels and 100 loss to the front is ridiculous.

I like to know it due to conversation with people that aren't that into cars. Since most manufacturer's qoute engine HP figures and all modified car owners qoute @ wheel figures it makes discussions with people that aren't into cars difficult.

Classic case, talk to some one that bought a brand new HSV "My HSV makes 307kw, what does yours make" "My car makes 280kw@wheels" "....Haha my stock HSV has more power". Therefore if you are talking to some one, say your friends parents or something, i always use engine HP figures cause by the time i start explaining drive train losses they will tune out and the discussion will be over.

Hahah Phil, but when i say im making 650-700 hp ......at the wheels.... thru an auto ...... they all just tend to say FAARRRKKKKKK....so all technical conversation bullshit stops and they all become riceboy fans :D

hahah

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...