Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 846
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Remember guys, Monday is March the 1st. Deposits are due then, if you haven't paid or have proof of payment before this day it becomes a first come first serve basis. Who ever fronts up the cash, is in :rofl:

Remember guys, Monday is March the 1st. Deposits are due then, if you haven't paid or have proof of payment before this day it becomes a first come first serve basis. Who ever fronts up the cash, is in :rofl:

will wire through full payment of $225 on thursday

You can wire through $100 on Thursday if you wish, only the deposits are due at this stage. But yes, the $25 on the day, if possible, bring exact change, makes things run a lot quicker and as you can imagine, you'd rather be on track than tracking down loose change :rofl:

You can wire through $100 on Thursday if you wish, only the deposits are due at this stage. But yes, the $25 on the day, if possible, bring exact change, makes things run a lot quicker and as you can imagine, you'd rather be on track than tracking down loose change :P

if i gotta give the money to you then i will bring $25 in 5c pieces lol......just to piss you off :rofl:

nah i would rather wire the full $200 otherwise i will use the $$ up somehow....seems to happen quite a bit lol

if i gotta give the money to you then i will bring $25 in 5c pieces lol......just to piss you off :rofl:

nah i would rather wire the full $200 otherwise i will use the $$ up somehow....seems to happen quite a bit lol

First, you're an ass :P

Second, totally understand. I'll make sure Reuben passes on the appropriate info when he checks for receipt of payment :(

Member Number: 3856525

From Account: XXXXXXXX

Payment Amount : $100.00

Date for Payment: 24/2/2010

Reference : scandyflick track day

BSB : 105-192

Account No. : 028822340

Account Name: SAU:SA

Member Number: 3856525

From Account: XXXXXXXX

Payment Amount : $100.00

Date for Payment: 24/2/2010

Reference : scandyflick track day

BSB : 105-192

Account No. : 028822340

Account Name: SAU:SA

Cheers Dave, will confirm with Roo Roo once payment goes through :P

Congratulations to David (writeoff) for winning the track day raffle. He will now participate at the low cost of $5. Mind boggling as to why more tickets didnt sell, even to those who had already paid and/or entered, surely the $5 gamble is worth saving hundreds.

Again, Congrats David from the exec :devil:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...