Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, first of all I did search for this, but I got mixed results.

How much power does the N/A RB25 make stock standard in a r33 or r34?

From what I understand, I've heard things from 90kW all the way to 150kW... I'm guessing its around 120kW?

Cheers, Jimbo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/
Share on other sites

Are you sure you searched properly? lol this question is everywere.

r33 - 140kw@fly

VCT - 147kw@fly (series 2 NA) or type s variants

r34 - 147kw@fly

I think even some rare r32s came with a NA rb25 which was about 130kw@fly?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037059
Share on other sites

My RB25DE in my R32 dyno'd @ 115rwkw. Your mum's magna/verada or whatever is heavier, handles like crap, looks like crap and is FWD. I wouldn't even compare the two.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037195
Share on other sites

My RB25DE in my R32 dyno'd @ 115rwkw. Your mum's magna/verada or whatever is heavier, handles like crap, looks like crap and is FWD. I wouldn't even compare the two.

Yes I agree with you; it looks like crap and FWD is a downside. But, it doesn't handle like crap... http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_1781/title...TV/article.html

I would have thought that 163kW was pretty good for an N/A, but no, I would never own one..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037219
Share on other sites

My RB25DE in my R32 dyno'd @ 115rwkw. Your mum's magna/verada or whatever is heavier, handles like crap, looks like crap and is FWD. I wouldn't even compare the two.

i disagree after owning 2 v6 magna's. sure they might not handle quite as well, but they aren't that much heavier and have much more torque to make up for the extra weight. the on;y model that is sluggish is the 4 speed auto (5 speed auto is fine) and that is because it has ridiculously tall gearing. i'm talking 150kmh in second. seriously, people take these to the drags and can cross the line redlining second gear.

as for fwd being a bad thing, that is a highly uneducated response that gets thrown around way too often these days. basically it is said because you can't be some fuli hektic drifta wannabe in a fwd car, but who really cares?

Jimbo

There is a difference between power at the fly and power at the wheels, dont get confused.

yeah, as a very rough rule, flywheel kw = hp at the wheels (then divide by 1.34 to get kw at the wheels). but as i said, it's a rough rule and doesn't work for everything

A verada would be quicker then an N/A line anyway. Honestly if you're buying a car to "beat other cars" an N/A Skyline shouldn't be your choice.

+1. my manual 3.5L magna with just a catback ran a 14.8 at willowbank. also outright power doesn't mean you are going to beat something with similar power. so many other things come into play. i'd put money on my 88fwkw pulsar keeping up or beating half of the skylines on here that are making more power, for the simple fact that it weighs about 200kg less.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037626
Share on other sites

i disagree after owning 2 v6 magna's. sure they might not handle quite as well, but they aren't that much heavier and have much more torque to make up for the extra weight. the on;y model that is sluggish is the 4 speed auto (5 speed auto is fine) and that is because it has ridiculously tall gearing. i'm talking 150kmh in second. seriously, people take these to the drags and can cross the line redlining second gear.

as for fwd being a bad thing, that is a highly uneducated response that gets thrown around way too often these days. basically it is said because you can't be some fuli hektic drifta wannabe in a fwd car, but who really cares?

yeah, as a very rough rule, flywheel kw = hp at the wheels (then divide by 1.34 to get kw at the wheels). but as i said, it's a rough rule and doesn't work for everything

+1. my manual 3.5L magna with just a catback ran a 14.8 at willowbank. also outright power doesn't mean you are going to beat something with similar power. so many other things come into play. i'd put money on my 88fwkw pulsar keeping up or beating half of the skylines on here that are making more power, for the simple fact that it weighs about 200kg less.

Would you agree that if you want a "fast street NA" you'd be better off dropping your unsprung mass and upgrading your tyres rather than chasing pitiful NA power mods?

P plater Falcodores pull up beside me all the time with 4 people in their car, monster subs rumbling in the boot AND 20" solid chromies and rev their engine at me. Do they assume that all Commodore/Falcons are automatic drag cars?

I'd love to see a little pulsar with a lightened flywheel, 6kg rims, all unneccesary weight removed and grippy tyres take off one day. I reckon it'd put quite a few cars to shame.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037874
Share on other sites

Would you agree that if you want a "fast street NA" you'd be better off dropping your unsprung mass and upgrading your tyres rather than chasing pitiful NA power mods?

P plater Falcodores pull up beside me all the time with 4 people in their car, monster subs rumbling in the boot AND 20" solid chromies and rev their engine at me. Do they assume that all Commodore/Falcons are automatic drag cars?

I'd love to see a little pulsar with a lightened flywheel, 6kg rims, all unneccesary weight removed and grippy tyres take off one day. I reckon it'd put quite a few cars to shame.

Pulsars aren't all that spectacular, a mates pulsar has exhaust,extractors,cams,NIStune, light rims, l/w flywheel, hd clutch and my car and a mates commodore are still a lot quicker then his. I know for a fact that a 25DE R33 with catback and pod can edge out a stock VX V6. Peak HP and power/weight ratio aren't everything, gearing & torque are IMO more important and then the driver comes into play.....hell i know people with WRX's that wouldnt be able to beat an excel from how shit they drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037894
Share on other sites

Would you agree that if you want a "fast street NA" you'd be better off dropping your unsprung mass and upgrading your tyres rather than chasing pitiful NA power mods?

P plater Falcodores pull up beside me all the time with 4 people in their car, monster subs rumbling in the boot AND 20" solid chromies and rev their engine at me. Do they assume that all Commodore/Falcons are automatic drag cars?

I'd love to see a little pulsar with a lightened flywheel, 6kg rims, all unneccesary weight removed and grippy tyres take off one day. I reckon it'd put quite a few cars to shame.

yes i would agree.

Pulsars aren't all that spectacular, a mates pulsar has exhaust,extractors,cams,NIStune, light rims, l/w flywheel, hd clutch and my car and a mates commodore are still a lot quicker then his. I know for a fact that a 25DE R33 with catback and pod can edge out a stock VX V6. Peak HP and power/weight ratio aren't everything, gearing & torque are IMO more important and then the driver comes into play.....hell i know people with WRX's that wouldnt be able to beat an excel from how shit they drive.

well then your mates pulsar is crap (more than likely the tune), unless of course it is either the 1.6L or an old 1.8L, because a sr20 with nistune, poncams, and full exhaust should be putting out around 110kw at the wheels (which has little to do with the cams as they only give about 4kw up top but give 7 or 8kw to the low and middle), and able to run mid 14's with slicks. there is even 1 or 2 into the 13's that are still natro and just have headwork ontop of the cams, exhaust and nistune. there are a few into the 14's with street tyres and plenty running very low 15's still on stock ecu and cams on street tyres.

and from my experience, with my pulsar putting out about 88kw at the wheels from just full exhaust and panel filter, it can adequately keep up with commodores or NA skylines. and if the skyline is an auto it will do more than keep up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5039309
Share on other sites

All your comments are all true, but at the end of the day I will be on my P-Plates, and I don't want to lose my license. So until then, I'm sure 120kW's will be more than enough. There's something about Japanese cars that I love, and I just can't see myself driving a Magnafalcodore..!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5047749
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...