Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

thats very wrog for them to be doing that so close to houses.... well its wrong to be doing on the street ! but unfortunately these people do exist and no matter how hard you try to stop them it will not stop...

thats very wrog for them to be doing that so close to houses.... well its wrong to be doing on the street ! but unfortunately these people do exist and no matter how hard you try to stop them it will not stop...

As true as this may be, when its your street and your family affected you'll continue to try to stop them no matter how pointless it may seem.

if there are more than two witnesses that passed on info to the police, surely these peanuts will receive some sort of punishment. well I hope they do anyway

ive been reported for other stuff man, not ripping skids but ive heard its something like 14 sightings of you doing stupid shit and they do something.. keep reporting them bud.. if ppl wanna do that stuff go to industrial areas :D

ive been reported for other stuff man, not ripping skids but ive heard its something like 14 sightings of you doing stupid shit and they do something.. keep reporting them bud.. if ppl wanna do that stuff go to industrial areas :) the track

fixed.

I know a guy who had 4 or so reports within 10 minutes cause he was being a sik cvnt in his vl (surprise?), all he received was a letter in the post stating that he had been reported doing burnouts.

Can only hope that they're bright enough to realise local residents don't want that behavior and move on somewhere else, keep the reports up.

they havent been back since so maybe the mate they was visiting passed on the residents regards lol if it happens again i will try the old 1/2 house brick at the car trick that might at least get them too stop so we can all have a nice chat lol

I know a guy who had 4 or so reports within 10 minutes cause he was being a sik cvnt in his vl (surprise?), all he received was a letter in the post stating that he had been reported doing burnouts.

Can only hope that they're bright enough to realise local residents don't want that behavior and move on somewhere else, keep the reports up.

it only takes 1 reporting... and haha on the edit.. like i said its about 10-14 reports and they come to your house for a "friendly" chat.. go over your car and look for defects most likely

Many moons ago I received a visit from the local constabulary over a single report for a road rage incident.....never touched the douche but his hair literally turned white before my eyes.

I denied all accusations till the cows came home which made it my word against his but the mongrel had it coming......cops will always try and seek an admission of liability though.

So I suppose it boils down to resources at the time and the nature of the alleged offence as to whether you get a visit, phone call or otherwise.

it only takes 1 reporting... and haha on the edit.. like i said its about 10-14 reports and they come to your house for a "friendly" chat.. go over your car and look for defects most likely

They couldnt defect you, because you are on private property..assuming you are parked on your driveway..?

They couldnt defect you, because you are on private property..assuming you are parked on your driveway..?

Pretty sure the police can defect you anywhere if they believe the car is likely to be driven on public roads.

i Know what you mean when i had my black 32, had a guy in another black 32 come and buy some parts so we started to talk about our cars. When he left he thought it would be a good idea to LAY it out front of my house and half way up the street so an hour later the cops came knocked on my door, well ppl had complaned and said it was my car and rego the car was in my garage. course they didnt belive me and they slaped me with a defect (IN MY GARAGE) I live on gemini drive @ munno para west and yes its getting a bit out of hand

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...