Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha, the funniest thing in that thread is the guy saying that his Haltech was plug and play because it was installed in under 3 hours. If that's true, then my FMIC was plug and play too because it was installed in under 3 hours as well.

And so was my front facing plenum, my previous S-AFC (hell, that was less than *2* hours including wire splicing), and my 550cc injectors will also be plug and play :) Jeebus, my whole car was plug and play! All those mods aren't as complicated as I thought :O

hahahaha Plug & Play hahahaha

It can take less than 3 hour to do alot of things. lmost all Turbo upgrades are from now on to be called 'plug & play'. Actually due to the simplicity of most upgrades I think they are all plug & play. There are a few people on this forum who have had alot of success with their 'plug & play' engine swaps.

FOR SALE - one plug & play RB25det front cut.

i plugged my playstation into my rb20det sil and i remapped the fuel/air ratios. I just used the plug and play Gran Turismo edit. You guys want me to do yours?

On a serious note, if this did actually work and the fabrication wasn't much to take it up to the price of a r32 one then it would be quite handy for rb20det owners. Be good if he gave some more info tho.

Is this thread for real or not, I would have thought with the wide use of the Apex PFC by now someone would have already stumbled onto this "miracle" if it were so easy why would AP engineering need to custom make the PFC to suit rb20det's at such a higher cost. But if it true i'd be totally stoked.

Now who's gonna be the ginney pig to try and post up results. :D

Is this thread for real or not, I would have thought with the wide use of the Apex PFC by now someone would have already stumbled onto this "miracle" if it were so easy why would AP engineering need to custom make the PFC to suit rb20det's at such a higher cost. But if it true i'd be totally stoked.

Now who's gonna be the ginney pig to try and post up results. ;)

Thats a good question. Dose it really work? I'm not close to getting my car running to try. I know someone who has a PFC for a RB25.

i plugged my playstation into my rb20det sil and i remapped the fuel/air ratios. I just used the plug and play Gran Turismo edit. You guys want me to do yours?

On a serious note, if this did actually work and the fabrication wasn't much to take it up to the price of a r32 one then it would be quite handy for rb20det owners. Be good if he gave some more info tho.

Interesting, that sounds very similar to Carlo's "brOtec"...maybe you guys should swap notes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...