Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25DET Neo Vs RB25/30  

47 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I used to run a built RB25 in my HQ (auto box) making 280ish rwkw @ 20psi. It was very fast once on boost (GT3082R) but it was still relatively laggy with this turbo. I then built a RB30 bottom end and matched it to the same turbo, the car made more power @ 18psi and 1000ish RPM earlier. It was the best decision I ever made and I absolutely regret wasting my money on building the original RB25. The 30 is just so much smoother and nicer to drive. So much power and torque down low and it just pulls and pulls and pulls. If I could do it all again, I would go straight to an RB30 bottom end... Especially on a street car when low RPM cruising is essential. I'm now running a GT3540 and it still makes boost earlier than the 25 with small turbo and its a billion times better to drive. Thats my experience :P

How about all those Supras, RX7's and Big V8's running 800rw/hp with 9-10sec passes that are all RWD?

I think it comes down to decent suspension, tyre setup and launch control.

From what I have read, the RB25/30 will be a great street/drag combo however just waiting to take a drive in Dave's car to see how the new RB25 + turbo setup goes :worship:

Edited by QRI05E

Hmmm I await your impressions QRI05E, I'm in the same boat as ya, got a r33 gtst s2 bone stock (engine wise) and looking for idea's xD. alas the age old debate, rb25 or rb30/25....plus being in nrth qld limits my engine builders down a bit.

any suggestions onto who does 'mail in' engines? I'm doing research ^^;

Nothing stopping you shipping the engine/bits down to them to get it built.

Bubba, missed that post will pm you some.

Spoke to Adam my tuner today and here is what we have decided.

Stock RB25DET Neo

- High mount twin scroll manifold

- Garrett GT35R with .82 rear

- Bosch 040

- 800cc injectors

- SARD FPR

- FMIC

- Greddy Plenum

- Q45 Throttle

- Full exhaust

- Haltech E11v2

Should see easily 300rw/kw

Drive around for a while... then when I need more power... RB25/30DET with the same setup should see 400rw/kw

twin scroll manifold with non twin scroll rear housing on the turbo?

i am not sure if a 040 will support 300-400kw, you may want to look into using a 044 instead.

forget the sard fuel pressure reg waste of money, 800cc injectors will outflow a GT35R @ stock fuel pressure.

twin scroll manifold with non twin scroll rear housing on the turbo?

i am not sure if a 040 will support 300-400kw, you may want to look into using a 044 instead.

forget the sard fuel pressure reg waste of money, 800cc injectors will outflow a GT35R @ stock fuel pressure.

Agreed.

That, and with that turbo, why not throw an RB30E in there, run less boost, make more torque and earlier, and have a much more streetable setup?

I will be throwing in the RB25/30 in there eventually... just didnt see the point of ripping out a perfectly good engine. The reason for the GT35R is to that when I do decide to build the RB25/30 I wont need to update the turbo.

Would a T04Z be overkill? Im thinking about the new Garrett GT3788R... Any ideas?

What's the resoning behind changing the throttle body exactly?

All it'll do is hard throttle control. Not like the factory unit doesn't flow enough, everyone else has made 380rwkw out of it easily enough.

From what I have seen, all the 400kw+ RB's switch to a larger throttle but we'll see how we go.

Will I run onto any issues with the RB25 Neo head on the RB30? I have read a few posts with people running into a few issues such as the bolting up a Greddy plenum with the factory thottle body.

Edited by QRI05E
From what I have seen, all the 400kw+ RB's switch to a larger throttle but we'll see how we go.

Where have you seen this exactly?

Just because people change a part, does not mean it's a requirement or needed. Some people just get caught up in what they get fed.

recent thread come up about this actually!

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/La...dy-t291471.html

R31Nismoid - Thanks for the info, like I said, i might just wait and see how we go.

Anyone used a GT3788R on a RB25 yet?

If youwant streetable response, look at the GT3076 or the 3082.

When that gets thrown on the RB25/30, you'll have an unreal combination that will NOT have to be revved, but will be able to when needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...