Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25DET Neo Vs RB25/30  

47 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I used to run a built RB25 in my HQ (auto box) making 280ish rwkw @ 20psi. It was very fast once on boost (GT3082R) but it was still relatively laggy with this turbo. I then built a RB30 bottom end and matched it to the same turbo, the car made more power @ 18psi and 1000ish RPM earlier. It was the best decision I ever made and I absolutely regret wasting my money on building the original RB25. The 30 is just so much smoother and nicer to drive. So much power and torque down low and it just pulls and pulls and pulls. If I could do it all again, I would go straight to an RB30 bottom end... Especially on a street car when low RPM cruising is essential. I'm now running a GT3540 and it still makes boost earlier than the 25 with small turbo and its a billion times better to drive. Thats my experience :P

How about all those Supras, RX7's and Big V8's running 800rw/hp with 9-10sec passes that are all RWD?

I think it comes down to decent suspension, tyre setup and launch control.

From what I have read, the RB25/30 will be a great street/drag combo however just waiting to take a drive in Dave's car to see how the new RB25 + turbo setup goes :worship:

Edited by QRI05E

Hmmm I await your impressions QRI05E, I'm in the same boat as ya, got a r33 gtst s2 bone stock (engine wise) and looking for idea's xD. alas the age old debate, rb25 or rb30/25....plus being in nrth qld limits my engine builders down a bit.

any suggestions onto who does 'mail in' engines? I'm doing research ^^;

Nothing stopping you shipping the engine/bits down to them to get it built.

Bubba, missed that post will pm you some.

Spoke to Adam my tuner today and here is what we have decided.

Stock RB25DET Neo

- High mount twin scroll manifold

- Garrett GT35R with .82 rear

- Bosch 040

- 800cc injectors

- SARD FPR

- FMIC

- Greddy Plenum

- Q45 Throttle

- Full exhaust

- Haltech E11v2

Should see easily 300rw/kw

Drive around for a while... then when I need more power... RB25/30DET with the same setup should see 400rw/kw

twin scroll manifold with non twin scroll rear housing on the turbo?

i am not sure if a 040 will support 300-400kw, you may want to look into using a 044 instead.

forget the sard fuel pressure reg waste of money, 800cc injectors will outflow a GT35R @ stock fuel pressure.

twin scroll manifold with non twin scroll rear housing on the turbo?

i am not sure if a 040 will support 300-400kw, you may want to look into using a 044 instead.

forget the sard fuel pressure reg waste of money, 800cc injectors will outflow a GT35R @ stock fuel pressure.

Agreed.

That, and with that turbo, why not throw an RB30E in there, run less boost, make more torque and earlier, and have a much more streetable setup?

I will be throwing in the RB25/30 in there eventually... just didnt see the point of ripping out a perfectly good engine. The reason for the GT35R is to that when I do decide to build the RB25/30 I wont need to update the turbo.

Would a T04Z be overkill? Im thinking about the new Garrett GT3788R... Any ideas?

What's the resoning behind changing the throttle body exactly?

All it'll do is hard throttle control. Not like the factory unit doesn't flow enough, everyone else has made 380rwkw out of it easily enough.

From what I have seen, all the 400kw+ RB's switch to a larger throttle but we'll see how we go.

Will I run onto any issues with the RB25 Neo head on the RB30? I have read a few posts with people running into a few issues such as the bolting up a Greddy plenum with the factory thottle body.

Edited by QRI05E
From what I have seen, all the 400kw+ RB's switch to a larger throttle but we'll see how we go.

Where have you seen this exactly?

Just because people change a part, does not mean it's a requirement or needed. Some people just get caught up in what they get fed.

recent thread come up about this actually!

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/La...dy-t291471.html

R31Nismoid - Thanks for the info, like I said, i might just wait and see how we go.

Anyone used a GT3788R on a RB25 yet?

If youwant streetable response, look at the GT3076 or the 3082.

When that gets thrown on the RB25/30, you'll have an unreal combination that will NOT have to be revved, but will be able to when needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
×
×
  • Create New...