Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

i recently went camping and my front bar had a bit kiss to a rock

I didn't see on the floor devo as ;)

but now i'm in the market for a new fron bar :)

I found this one on j tuned but don't no what it's called if anyone knows

can u please help me out

20bc3939.jpg

and if any can post up some clean front bar that would be helpfully

cheers everyone

I don't know what the frontbars called man when I find out i'll pm you maybe we can get it cheaper for two ;) I've baught stuff from psi parts there a good company

just wish I knew where to buy it from

Hey guys

i recently went camping and my front bar had a bit kiss to a rock

I didn't see on the floor devo as :)

but now i'm in the market for a new fron bar :)

I found this one on j tuned but don't no what it's called if anyone knows

can u please help me out

20bc3939.jpg

and if any can post up some clean front bar that would be helpfully

cheers everyone

In the 3rd post by Trent 26 that's the do luk front bar but instill don't know what the front bars called

in the pic I posted :)

The closes it looks to is the Do Luck Front Bar but for a R33 GTS-T, but the pic you posted it is on a GTR.

GTS-T front bar on a GTR.

Suck, I can't find the article on that R33 GTR on J-Tuned, cuz they updated the website and have all new cars no more archives.

same front bar as psi parts has on their demo car, and yep its do-luck... nice..

it isnt actually - looking at the bar there are a few differences in lines accross the bar

lower lip is smooth not ridged - angles on the side openings are different

Body10.jpg

wilyawns pic is the right bar

Their both Do-Luck ones, which one do you prefer?

GTS-T or GTR Do-Luck front bar, up to you.

IMO the GTS-T one looks better but without the line that goes across the intercooler. (Like the 1st pic you posted)

Yer I was swinging that way I've delt with fiberglass before so if I was getting

that's front bar I would cut that bit out and patch it up ;)

I can also get the gtr one but made for gtst

so options are still there

got to remember some molds come out different from different places, i've got a few mates with do-luck fronts and sides and they look slightly different, more curved etc on one of them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...