Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You can also look into putting steel wheels into your turbos, if its a tight budget and only looking at slight performance. I'm running 17psi on my ones and 287rwkw with supporting mods and it cost me $1100 with all the labour done myself, I bought the turbo cores of a member here with the wheels already balanced and ready to go and just added my exhaust housing and compressor housing of the old turbos. Not that hard if you have basic mechanical knowledge, I had no issues doing all this myself and saved alot on labour.

But if budget allows, do what R31Nismoid recommended earlier Garrett -7, much better than my option and can make much more power as well as less work involved.

Cheers

Aren't the -9's the way to go now instead of -7's? (or are they more expensive?)

Well Nismoids above post has thrown me as for the past few months I have noticed he is a pro -9 man :P

Edited by gtr fan

i can vouch for garretts being the best choice for a street replacement on a budget.

i would say go the -7's or -9's

i've got -5's which are a little bit of overkill, i only got them because they were the ones that came available the soonest when my stockers blew the rear wheel off.

the -7's or -9's would be better for response and still have plenty of power!

i hope your mates car will be fine after he gets the turbo's replaced and doesnt have my luck and have the motor blow a week and a half after the new turbos are installed.

Aren't the -9's the way to go now instead of -7's? (or are they more expensive?)

His post says slight improvement over factory, -7's are the closest.

-9's are 330rwkw, which IMO i wouldn't be taking a R32 motor to that level given their age/conditoon now.

So 280rwkw or so on -7's would be reasonable and about 30-40rwkw more than factory turbo's.

If he wanted a bit more performance, with a planned rebuild, then -9's for sure.

Say you were running 300kw, would the -9s produce that with a slightly lower temperature (due to the better compressor efficiency) than the -7s? Or are they only better when you're running them right at the peak?

Not 100% sure but it's not going to be a 30 degree difference or anything major i would imagine.

Probably a difference, however majorly signifigant? Probably not.

300rwkw i would still pick -9's though. 280rwkw would be the aim for -7's.

just a slightly off topic question....why are the power out puts between a -7 and a -9 so different, looking at the spec sheets they are so close to the same it isnt funny (-9 slightly smaller in the compressor and slightly larger in the turbine but we are talking 0.0Xmm difference)

Rebuild it with steel internals or go for R34 GTR N1 turbo's.

Or any aftermarket that is listed in thread.

what is the benefit of N1 turbos , everybody says there great , what would a pair set me back!

what is the benefit of N1 turbos , everybody says there great , what would a pair set me back!

They came from factory on the R34 GTR V-Spec II N1, R34 GTR V-Spec II Nur and R34 GTR M-Spec Nur.

R34 GTR N1 turbos came from factory with steel internals and they ran 1.2 bar boost stock.

So they are very strong and responsive.

I had driven a R34 GTR V-Spec II Nur with 306 rw kW's still retaining the N1 turbos.

Was excellent.

Try the for sale section and from memory about $1450 + a pair.

- http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Wr...mp;hl=n1+turbos <--- He's selling them for $1450 a pair.

Should be straight bolt on fit too.

They came from factory on the R34 GTR V-Spec II N1, R34 GTR V-Spec II Nur and R34 GTR M-Spec Nur.

R34 GTR N1 turbos came from factory with steel internals and they ran 1.2 bar boost stock.

So they are very strong and responsive.

I had driven a R34 GTR V-Spec II Nur with 306 rw kW's still retaining the N1 turbos.

Was excellent.

Try the for sale section and from memory about $1450 + a pair.

- http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Wr...mp;hl=n1+turbos <--- He's selling them for $1450 a pair.

After reading a few topics and the GCG website the gt2860r-7 are equalent or closest to n1 turbos that came in the cars that you mentioned.

My understanding is that the gt2860r-9 are equalent or closest to HKS GTSS.

just a slightly off topic question....why are the power out puts between a -7 and a -9 so different, looking at the spec sheets they are so close to the same it isnt funny (-9 slightly smaller in the compressor and slightly larger in the turbine but we are talking 0.0Xmm difference)

The physical dimensions of the wheels are one of MANY variables. The -9's have newer more modern wheels which flow more and more efficiently without needing to be bigger or lighter.

To the previous posts about the -7 turbos, I'll say it again, -9's AREN'T any laggier than -7's so there is NO advantage of -7's! If u only want to make a certain amount of power, just run -9's on low boost!

i can vouch for garretts being the best choice for a street replacement on a budget.

i would say go the -7's or -9's

i've got -5's which are a little bit of overkill, i only got them because they were the ones that came available the soonest when my stockers blew the rear wheel off.

the -7's or -9's would be better for response and still have plenty of power!

i hope your mates car will be fine after he gets the turbo's replaced and doesnt have my luck and have the motor blow a week and a half after the new turbos are installed.

Damn that is bad luck

Im guessing the ceramic turbos did the damage initially.

I was thinking the way to go is gt2860r-7

Are bigger turbs generally more laggy.

Everyones advice has been extremely helpful .

Damn that is bad luck

Im guessing the ceramic turbos did the damage initially.

I was thinking the way to go is gt2860r-7

Are bigger turbs generally more laggy.

Everyones advice has been extremely helpful .

why not -9's? Newer more modern turbo. Same response, more efficient, more power, same price. I dunno why they don't discontinue -7's and put an end to all this confusion.

After reading a few topics and the GCG website the gt2860r-7 are equalent or closest to n1 turbos that came in the cars that you mentioned.

My understanding is that the gt2860r-9 are equalent or closest to HKS GTSS.

Yeah, I think your right, by looking at my Turbo Chart, the specs seem the same.

And yes the -9's = HKS GT-SS (well, very close)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, nothing formal, just open track days. Mostly small and tight circuits but I would like to get back out to Eastern Creek at some stage.
    • What type of track driving will you be doing?  Do you have a set of class rules you need to abide by that will limit your rim / tyre width?
    • I've been reading a lot lately about unsprung weight and how beneficial it can be to reduce it for driving on the track, given my semi's only have another day or two in them I am throwing around the idea of some lighter wheels and a square set up. I have 265/35/19's and 245/40(?)/19 Federal 595's at the moment. The wheels and tyres are super heavy. I looked up my wheel weight online and got 14.5kg naked. Not sure if this was 8.5 (front) or 9 (rear) but that's a lot. I have also been reading about the benefits of a square setup. Much better rotation and potentially less understeer.  When I throw these together I'm thinking about a 17x9 or 18x9 square (preferably under 10kgs per wheel) with 245 or 255's. I can get some cheap 17x8.5 BMW M Sport wheels, they weight 10.5 kg's each but at 8.5 wide could probably only get 245's on them? I know they come with 255's from factory but semi's are a bit chunkier. Otherwise it will be aftermarket wheels in a 9" width. Most of the other BMW wheels are heavy unless you pay a squillion dollars for some M wheels.  Although, the E46 M3 Style 67's could be good but I'd have to buy 2 sets to square them up.  My car has a tickle over 400hp and about to put an LSD in also, is 245 a little thin for a square setup? It kinda feels that way to me. Also, is there any tangible benefit to having 18's over 17's? Is the footprint demonstrably bigger? From those of you who went to light(er) wheels after heavy buggers, did you notice it much?
    • Start with the R32 GTR wiring diagram. The ECU is essentially the same, so the pinouts are good. The details around ECCS relays, etc might differ a little bit, but the reality is that you need to get ignition power to kick the ECU so it powers up the ECCS relay which brings the rest of the ECU up. This also gives power to the other circuits that are needed to make the engine run, like the ignition coils, etc. All of this is visible on the R32 diagram and should give you a strong guide, even if it's not quite the same as the R33. As to specifics - I'm pretty sure no-one can help you from afar, as there is no way to know what mistake or omission has been made in connecting stuff up. It always turns out to be "LOL, I shorted something and an entire wire vanished out of the loom", or "We never connected X or Y main connector", or "shit, you mean I need to have that fuse installed?".
    • hello wanted some insight on what my problem could be so i swapped a RB26DETT into my r33 gtst used a R33 GTR engine harness and im using a haltech platinum pro. The car cranks but no start the ecu isn’t getting any power now im trying to find out why i cant seem to find any schematics  or diagram for the engine harness for the r33 gtr anything helps thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...