Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Before today I wasnt a big fan of commodores, but after today, I will never bag another vt to current commodore.

My friend owns and drives a VX series 2 executive. Travelling down a large hill today up at nambour. Pissing down rain, and water all over the road.

My friend was driving, and all of a sudden I feel the rear end step out. we werent speeding, in fact doing about 75 maybe 80 in a 80 zone. we hit a massive river of water flowing down the hill and the left rear stepped out. Being at the top of the hill, and with about a 45-50 degree incline, we starting sliding down the hill sideways. then it rolled onto the passenger side, then onto the roof.

We were travelling at about 70km/ph down the hill on the roof of this commodore. for appox 15-20 metres when we hit a guard rail for a massive embankment that was flooding with water. we hit it so fast on the drivers side, that it acted like a pivot and flipped the car again, righting itself in a flooded culvit, with trees and shit everywhere. both crawled out about 3 metres up this embankment, and called the police, etc. Police were really good, said the driver didnt breach the road rules and was just an 'accident'

Both Taken to hospital, nothing major wrong, just bump on head, few cuts, sore neck, back, arms and dizzy. (I think I will feel it tomorrow)

Being a car buff, I was interested to see what damage and stuff had happened, (before being taken to hospital, that is)

The engine shut off, whilst we were upside down. no fuel leaks or ruptures, even though rear suspension had collapsed.

The engine was shunted back and down, thus ensuring it did not protrude into the cabin. (engine would have been ****ed)

All windows were 'flung out' during the accident and had 'rolled up' with the tinting. The only cuts I got were on my feet from collecting all my shit over the road. Because we were upside down, everything was on the roof. (excatly like the movie hot shots when he does a barrel roll and all his shit falls on the roof. because the rear window shot out whilst upside down, all our crap was spread all over the road, like cd's etc)

Air bags did not deploy, (thank god), insufficient damage to front and/or rear for them to deploy (i think)

The side panels absorbed most of the impact with the trees and guard rail, with them collapsing in critical places. not one panel was ok, it looked as though they all took the impact together.

dash, steering wheel and seats did not move one inch during the impact. seat belts did pretty good to stop us from moving around too much.

The roof was by far the most interesting thing, the pillars showed no sign of bending or collapse, but had crimpled in certain places in the middle of the roof, between the passenger and driver. Thus ensuring the head space above the driver and passenger was not compromised. (we collected a reflecter in the middle of the road which was embeded into the roof above me !! when we finished.)

In summary, I have always bagged commodores for being crap, etc, but after going through something like that and looking at what crash technology has been installed in modern cars, I have to admit if i was in a smaller car, I doubt we would have walked away. It was quite amazing for a car to stand up to travelling upside down at 70km/h, flip, and land in a gully and the passenger and driver to walk away. And you dont really take any notice of what crash tech is in your car until you have a crash, and walk around it, going "ah that bit collapsed allowing this bit to etc"

As soon as I get the ok from the doc, that I can drive again. He told me to rest as I will be very sore soon. I will post pics as soon as I can get photos of the car. and look more into the certain elements that saved my life today. I cant really go anywhere so I thought I would share this story with you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30657-commodores-are-good/
Share on other sites

Cool story Matt, Glad you and your friend are ok and glad you weren't in the R33R. Nice avatar...... now I need to change mine!! You deserve it more, having a genuine impul, mine is a genuine kit but not a real R33R. And Holdens have always been good to crash!!

very lucky there! I'd be entering lotto or something! There is some good things in modern cars afterall, and safety gets better every model - no matter what the car. One of the reasons i am not a fan of small cars, no matter what the safety features they might have, they never feel as "safe" as a larger car.

Without meaning to be rude, im glad you came out of your accident ok.

As safe as Holdens may be structurly, my mum drives holdens flagship car the caprice, and as "adavanced" as its sposed to be the airbags did not deploy, when she rear ended an almost stationary car at 80kph the other car almost not moving (doing approx 5kph). Caused 10g's worth of damage to her car alone and the airbags still didnt deploy, she broke the windshield in 2 spots, one with her wrist and one with head and yes she was wearing a seatbelt, the pyroneumatic (sp*) seatbelt pretensioners didnt work either. It was a dead front on collision.

How safe are holdens??

My mum and dad are currently seeking legal advice about what to do as mum was off work for a while in an accident where the airbags should have deployed and saved her from many of the injuries she recieved.

Just my 2 cents...

I dont think holden is good just from ur experience, sorry to hear about it by the way. The way i see it is the car does its job in the safety department, doesnt make it a special vehicle tho, its still JUST a holden. And i think if u were in an excel u would be ok as well, as it has panels that crunch easy to save u!

The issue is not panels that crunch "easy to save u". If the roof collapsed easily then it would have been extremely dangerous, hard to get out of the car, and could have caused serious injuries to the occupants. An Excel does not have anywhere near as much sheetmetal as a commodore to absorb and resist impacts, and is a lightweight old korean (or something) design. It may have some panels that crunch easy, but anyone can put some panels that collapse on a car, thats easy, and doesn't necessarily mean the car will be safe in a crash. Making a car safe in a crash is a complex and expensive excercise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...