Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thought I'd throw up a few of the shots I've been learning to do :P Comments welcome!

Taken on the southside of the gateway at the park nearby. Was messing with new flash and using car headlights. I really like the surreal lighting on the leaves.

4289735155_d79ba15986_b.jpg

Northside of the gateway under the new section. Messing with long exposures, this was taken at about 9pm, pretty much pitch black, but with the passing traffic and traffic lights gave some interesting lighting.

4271493722_1599622d76_b.jpg

Other direction of the photo above, again, messing with exposures and lighting

4270743861_b03449b876_b.jpg

Hows this one?
Yeah nice!

Might be slightly underexposed and framing slightly to the left (to get more sea in so the chair is at the right hand third line) might have helped (IMO)

Can't change framing now but for exposure this is kinda what I mean:

post-31383-1265927356_thumb.jpg

Good shots man. As for last shot - did you de-saturate one person and leave the other one saturated? Looks a little strange..

Haha I forgot about that. Yeah I did because she really ruined the pic imo. I probably should have de-sat the other person too. :sick:

Here's the original. :)

post-12150-1265930244_thumb.jpg

post-39016-1266151632_thumb.jpg

post-39016-1266151642_thumb.jpg

post-39016-1266151656_thumb.jpg

post-39016-1266151669_thumb.jpg

post-39016-1266151682_thumb.jpg

Couple from the trip to springbrook.

Possums were crazy. one tried to drink my beer. Others would let you pet them. A couple had a fight and ran straight towards me. I had to jump over one of them haha.

I dont knokw if i like the PP on the first two. I dont even know where to start or what look i want to finish with. too many possibilities.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...