Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks guys, its going to be a long week but should have some good results in a few more days. very happy with the setup overall - the twinscroll turbo + tomei 280 is a killer combination

Tried a smaller duration but same lift cam for comparison?

Car looks great, well done! Its strange to see an S14 but hear RB power on the vid :laugh:

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i promise a big post with more updates is coming, but right now its late and i need to eat some food.. in the meantime here is a breakdown of the atessa unit, ive got big things in store for this -- the data we acquired during testing and at the race taught me a lot about tq split and how good the stock nissan systems design is - just not the stock atessa ecu. I am working with a high level engineer on a standalone tq split controller that will replace the atessa ecu.

ATTESSAtop.jpg

ATTESSAbottom.jpg

Great work and innovation. Very interested to hear your results from the ATESSA computer! Are you aware that an Australian electronics guru RUZIC has developed a unit that can be used to adjust the response of the ATESSA computers output?

Good luck, keep the updates coming.

yes i am aware of that, as well as the Bee*R unit and HKS has one also. i personally dont like any of the piggybacks, i feel a standalone controller is the only way to _properly_ get it done...

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

here is some video of our final lap of the day (fast lap) and the cooldown lap:

Full-Race R14 Catches Fire at 2010 Tuner Shootout (Video) <--- click here

r14-fire-thumb.jpg

You can hear the aluminum exhaust break around 1min 25secs, and thats when things start to get scary..

the exh setup was we used a 22" long stainless DP, followed by the long aluminum exhuast. We used header wrap at the front of the exh, to protect the p/s hoses from heat, and this likely shortened the exhaust's life.. This aluminum exh has seen a lot of abuse, many hours of dynoing, street driving and practice sessions. The heavy loads during the time attack event were just too much and it gave up

fortunately it was an easy cleanup, the car is already back to blingin! needs a little work this weekend, but will be 100% by monday.

24913_402644621128_575236128_4505582_298380_n.jpg

here she is during some street driving

27068_10150175053810113_704920112_12332350_5243843_n.jpg

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

Please post the video link http://www.full-race.com/r14-fire-video.html on any forums or social networking sites you visit!! we need a lot of video views to make sure our sponsors stay with us for next year - you wouldnt believe how hard it is to get sponsorships these days, even for us

Please post the video link http://www.full-race.com/r14-fire-video.html on any forums or social networking sites you visit!! we need a lot of video views to make sure our sponsors stay with us for next year - you wouldnt believe how hard it is to get sponsorships these days, even for us

looks good geoff, shame about the silly power steer line.

do you have any high boost dyno graphs of this new turbo yet?

thanks

simon

Space front of diff snout down to get some diff pinion angle, so when you accelerate the diff wants to straighten and indirectly drives tyre into the ground?

would love to hear more about this!

Here is the dynochart from my latest round of testing with my RB26 (this was done in 4wd, on UMS's awd dynapacks, previous testing was done in 2wd mode)

R14-S300Pvs8875.jpg

this compares the S300P 0.80 a/r to the S300SX w/ 88mm compressor 1.00 a/r

orange: 0.80 a/r S300P, custom machined housing - 17.5psi tapering to 16psi

green: 0.80 a/r S300P, custom machined housing - 20.5psi tapering to 17.5psi

VS

pink:S300SX 88-75 1.00 a/r 19psi

blue: S300SX 88-75 1.00 a/r 19psi (same as above) with slight cam gear adjustment (advanced to +3 intake from +2, and added a little fuel during spoolup)

you can see the considerable gains in area-under-the-curve that i was able to acheive with this new turbo, and very small loss up top - well worth the tradeoff.

now that im all done, considering the amount of work I went through for this and time and expense required to make this S300P work, i think the 83-75 would have provided virtually the same powerband, and fit better as well as be easier to install.

FRTS83-75STI.JPG

^^I would kill to get that powerband with my RB26..

Hey Geoff

I've deicded to go back to twins for my setup.. after finding out the borg warner wont fit onto the manifold i have.. and cant spend much on it anymore dew to job.

no problem!! we will have a solution for the twin turbo guys T25 setups in the fall :) well worth waiting for..

would love to hear more about this!

sorry i dont understand what you want to hear more about?

sorry i dont understand what you want to hear more about?

Sorry, Well this is something I haven't heard much about, and just wondering what the results were like, and wether you had played around with it much. My car is rwd, so any added traction is alway in order.

what sort of spacing are we talking 1-2mm or 10mm??

regards, Jack

no problem!! we will have a solution for the twin turbo guys T25 setups in the fall :D well worth waiting for..

Will hold off on any decision for my car until then if your single results are anything to go by.

Any more development for this car?

Well this is something I haven't heard much about, and just wondering what the results were like, and wether you had played around with it much. My car is rwd, so any added traction is alway in order. what sort of spacing are we talking 1-2mm or 10mm??

if you are asking about "tilting the subframe" you can do that to change antisquat... however i didnt do that - i only spaced the snout of my driveshaft down with washers becuase instead of tilting the subframe, i just lifted it up all the way (until i couldnt raise it anymore) and my driveshaft is giant so it would almost hit the gas tank shield. Raising the subframe like this this did have a small change in antisquat, but the big difference is massive roll center correction. The front of a GTR is way easy to correct roll center with - front balljoint spacers + adjustable tie rod ends.

If you want good traction - what are the lengths you are using for your RUCA and Rear traction rod? Taking the time to measure bumpsteer is advised..

Will hold off on any decision for my car until then if your single results are anything to go by. Any more development for this car?

i can tell you that the year 2010 is going to be a BIG year for the turbocharging industry

Edited by Full-Race Geoff
.....The front of a GTR is way easy to correct roll center with - front balljoint spacers + adjustable tie rod ends.....

I only kind of agree with that - ball joint spacers or longer ball joints help but do not restore the factory geometry/roll centre unless you adjust the upper arms as well, which is hard to almost impossible without major changes.

I only kind of agree with that - ball joint spacers or longer ball joints help but do not restore the factory geometry/roll centre unless you adjust the upper arms as well, which is hard to almost impossible without major changes.

yes duncan, i do agree with that! unfortunately tallish ride height is required to keep the susp working right

here are some pics of the ATESSA test-jig i built. It is going to a very bright electrical engineer friend of mine who has experience with his own tq split ECU for time attack subarus. The GST subaru runs his system with great results.

GTRtqsplit-tester1.jpg

GTRtqsplit-tester2.jpg

cant wait to see what he comes up with - using onboard G sensor built onto his circuit board

good looking setup, and it will be interesting to see what you go with and what you find.

some things I know:

with big power cars, the more fwd, the quicker it goes. right up to 50/50 split

you will then blow up your front diff and break front driveshafts so they need looking at

if you still have lots of fwd on corner entry you will get significant corner entry understeer (in particular if you have a mechanical diff)

so really the required setup is relively simple, you could get OK results with just a brake light switch instead of g sensor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nope.    Grab a varex and turn it down as you get close to home, win win? 
    • So, I've had my V36 for about a month now and have already copped an "excessive exhaust noise" notification from QLD TMR, reported by someone in my local area. It's a twin as per the original, and can have a bit of a throaty note to it when idling cold 😄 and if I do get up it a bit, it can be noisy, but it did pass a roadworthy inspection before sale, so.... ... but in the interest of being a good neighbour, I do want to quieten it down a bit. Is anyone here running a quiet aftermarket cat-back on their V36 or 370Z? And the big, bold question: does an aftermarket cat-back really make much of a performance difference on these cars?
    • The wiring diagram for the R33 RB25 is freely available, and is essentially the same same as most other RBs (just with differences as to which pin # does which job). To get the ECU to power up, you just need to provide power to the ECCS relay, and have the other power feeds that come in from the top left of the wiring diagram (wrt the ECU) that give perma power to the fuel pump relay, the ECU itself, etc etc, all connected. When you put power on all these it will just come to life. It's pretty clear from the diagram what needs to happen. Just follow the lines from the 12V + supply stuff in the top left over towards the ECU. I've even posted snips of such diagrams (not for vanilla 25, I think for Neo and 26) to various threads here in the last few months, talking about what it takes to get the fuel pump and FPCM up and going. Search these up and they will help get you started on doing the same with the vanilla 25 diagram. Hell, for all I know, I've done the same with that one in years past and have forgotten.
    • Yep...so unless someone posts up the answer you will need to probe from the ECU connector to the dash plug with a multi meter in continuity mode to trace the wires.  Note the ECU has multiple - and + (and across different key settings - Battery, IGN and Start) and most likely the power is fed from the connector(s) that is normally near the left hand headlight.
    • Thanks Duncan, I am actually just trying to get the Rb turning and running with the RB25DET S2 original loom itself  I am just trying to get it going outside the body and not thinking about the S15 or trying to match anything to the S15 loom at all I am only trying to see if anyone has done this and what pin they found to be the ignition trigger and ECU+/- on the dash connector, that's about it. Thanks  
×
×
  • Create New...