Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Based on what testing?

full custom 3" system with gutted cat completey hollow with a 3" inlet xforce canon.. i dont see how this can restrict it enough to drop the boost down between changes and cause lagg? it makes the numbers just takes 6000rpm 2 get there

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ive checked out the video and had a listen to it a few times

the setup you have is defintely considerably largier than one would expect under normal operation

yes the turbocharger you have in question is a large unit, and yes its going to be laggy, but how laggy is the question

from the thread so far and number of suggestions you have highlighted one key fact that stands out with alarm bells ringing

"yeah as far as i know the vct is set to kick in at 3000rpm because at 2000rpm it was causing a slight throttle miss fire"

"found out from tuner its from 3000 to 6000rpm"

this is a key change in the engine characteristics and setup

the factory setup is on at 1800rpm and off at 4700rpm for the basic specifications

this provides the engine with a nice solid response all the way through the rev range and makes the engine crisp on the throttle

this is the optimum setting for the factory setup and coupled with a good tune of the AFRs and IGN map the car is amazing to drive (stock turbo etc)

with your setup it appears the turbocharger responds well (you can hear it wind up instantly), the car sounds loud and fast

ie the engine is making response / power and it sounds like we can hear boost and so on

its just the engine is lacking its punch, aka i suspect because VCT is on so late, the engine is essentially sluggish

there is enough exhaust gas and road speed to wake the turbocharger up and bring on some boost (you can hear it spooling away) but not enough to bring on full song

the end result is, you have a sluggish and underperforming setup consistently until you reach the normal VCT kick off point past 5000/6000RPM where its ineffienct to keep VCT on

so

my recommendation is

1) put to the VCT back to the factory specs

2) debug why it misfires at 2000rpm

3) re-check the complete tune now that VCT is fixed

4) re-test

i suspect the car will be very different to drive

full custom 3" system with gutted cat completey hollow with a 3" inlet xforce canon.. i dont see how this can restrict it enough to drop the boost down between changes and cause lagg? it makes the numbers just takes 6000rpm 2 get there

You mean a 2.5" cat.

That will cause no end of problems. Simple as that. Add to the fact it's not "piped" so there is even more turbulence going on.

the term your looking for is turbulence.

the step down in size in the exhaust causes turbulence which slows down the flow of exhaust gas backing up the system. once the gas slows it cools and causes friction on itself, causing it to slow further and further preventing you from spooling.. till suddenly you get enough gas thru the turbo to spin it. next gear and ur back where u started, pushing shit up hill.

that and the VCT issue paul has mentioned... poorly functioning VCT can and will make the motor a DOG to drive. you dont want to go building a turbo around these issues for the sake of it.. you want a turbo that works to your expectations when the motor is running how it should be.

the term your looking for is turbulence.

the step down in size in the exhaust causes turbulence which slows down the flow of exhaust gas backing up the system. once the gas slows it cools and causes friction on itself, causing it to slow further and further preventing you from spooling.. till suddenly you get enough gas thru the turbo to spin it. next gear and ur back where u started, pushing shit up hill.

that and the VCT issue paul has mentioned... poorly functioning VCT can and will make the motor a DOG to drive. you dont want to go building a turbo around these issues for the sake of it.. you want a turbo that works to your expectations when the motor is running how it should be.

thanks for the info paul.

i pulled the turbo back off thursday morning and sent it back to hypergear, then we are going from there

im pulling the stock manifold off the car this time and running a hi mount setup with larger dumpipe, still going to use 50mm external gate setup off the manifold, should be able to run a larger dumpipe and i will also look into gettin something other then a stock gutted cat.

once this is all done which should be in the next week or 2 it will hit the rollers again and see how we go

Edited by l0WRB

hi mount, low mount, internal, external, twin, single - i think its irrelevant in your case

the engine is not running as it should, you can tell, you can hear it wind up and come on boost, but theres not enough exhaust gas for full song as the engine isn't working optimally

its basically running at like 60% capacity, and when it peaks past 6000rpm VCT kicks off (as your link says to) and hey presto its running as per normal

fix the VCT

retune

away you go

stop changing things

the more things you change

the more guessing games and youll never nail it down to what it was

I had one of those purple cheapo gates from otto and it leaked bad, In the process of replacing it with a Tial.

Should get car back next week and Ill keep you informed on the outcome, tuner said it will come on boost quicker with a better gate.

thanks for that mlr.. let me know how u go because i thought there wasnt much 2 a wastegate at all? most of them all work the same?

No. If the piston doesn't seal perfectly you will get hug amount lag. It will be constantly leaking manifold pressure.

that and the design contributes to its operation. internal design quality and actual build quality will go a long way to make sure it operates how its meant to.. a poorly constructed gate is likely to creep like mad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...