Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Series 1 has only 1 plug, series 2 has 2 plugs

not necessarily, the second plug is for the auto which i believe has a on off and wot connection or something (haven't worked it out yet).

the series 2 R33 has the same tps as the R34 tps, it uses a bar through it to move a mechanism inside the unit where as the series 1 uses the actual throttle bar to move the part inside the tps..

so different systems altoghter.. i actually need to get a series 1 tps to suit the R34 wiring and i need all the wires connected (auto gearbox).

hope that helps abit

Curt

  • 1 month later...

Just to throw another one in the pot..

I have a Series 1 RB25, the grey connector fits straight up but is this the actual TPS wire or do i have to do something with the black connector on the tps?

q4521bg.jpg

Edited by brother_david
Just to throw another one in the pot..

I have a Series 1 RB25, the grey connector fits straight up but is this the actual TPS wire or do i have to do something with the black connector on the tps?

I simply transplanted the s1 RB25 TPS onto the VH45 throttle body. There are two corresponding plugs on the loom, and everything goes back together.

As per my earlier post, there is some lengthening/shortening of wiring lengths to make it all work since the TB is no longer where Nissan intended it.

I have no experience with the s2 loom, but given how easy the s1 install was, I can't see their job as any more difficult. It's just a giant Meccano set, so a bit of exploratory dismantling helps to improve the understanding.

Ye had that realization the other day, its all about fitting big and small chunks of Lego® together, with a small addition of tolerances where it is needed, kind of makes building an engine quite simple :D

Hoping the S2 question sorts, me on the ither hand sold the TPS with the stock engine, so now i guess im gonna know if the Q45 one works with the RB25 loom since it seems to fit "P

  • 1 month later...

Hey all,

I have some information to add to this:

I have a 1994 ECR33 rb25det 5spd in my old Datsun. It is a S2 engine. I have it wired in just like it was in the R33. Everything including the data port. I have been running the car in stock form for over a year now. I bought the GReddy intake and I have a 92 infiniti Q45 throttle body laying around from when I parted one out.

1. the S2 TPS setup has one brown connector on the upper tps connector port in stock configuration. The lower connector is the switch and it is not used or wired into the S2 loom. There should be a blank block off connector plugged into it. So you do not wire this up to your harness when you swap over to the Q45 TB.

That should help a good portion of people.

2. The S1 and S2 throttle position sensors do not correlate with each others outputs(We are not talking about the switch part). The lower connector on the S2 and the pigtailed connector on the S1 is the sensor circuit we are comparing here.

My Data for reference

Both my S2 sensors check out according to the FSM with FLYING COLORS. They spec out according to the FSM. They are to be back probed with ignition on engine off and they have voltage readings to be measured.

Well I busted out my meter and Bench tested 4 TPS's.

I drew up some pictures of the connectors which I will not share here, but I was able to reference the 2 styles of connectors that way. For comparison I bench tested the 4 tps sensors using my meter.

For your purposes I will compare them with a 1 , 2 , and 3 for each respective pin.

S2

1-2 idle 5.25kΩ

1-2 wot 136.3Ω

2-3 idle 257Ω

2-3 wot 5.32kΩ

1-3 total 5.28kΩ

S2

1-2 idle 5.02kΩ

1-2 wot 70Ω

2-3 idle 290Ω

2-3 wot 5.16kΩ

1-3 total 5.09kΩ

S1

1-2 idle 9.54Ω

1-2 wot 290Ω

2-3 idle 290Ω

2-3 wot 9.55kΩ

1-3 total 9.44kΩ

89 KA24e

1-2 idle 8.83kΩ

1-2 wot 124Ω

2-3 idle 324.4Ω

2-3 wot 8.90kΩ

1-3 total 8.76kΩ

I have a 86 300zxt (VG30et) and 92 Q45 TPS around somewhere as well. I may be able to locate them and test them as well, but I think I will get about the same results. There was a change with the Pre/partial OBDII stuff around 94 when Nissan jumped on that band wagon.

There is almost twice the amount of resistance going through the older S1 and KA TPS switches. The Q45 TPS should be the same as the KA24e...

Less resistance through the TPS means higher voltage signals to the ECU. Nissan must have had interference problems with the TPS signal and needed to up the voltage to clean it up. That is all I can think of. They did the same thing with the modern A/F sensors where the voltage scale starts at like 3 volts rather than 800mV like traditional sensors. If this is true they may have changed the engineering of the wire shielding for the sensor wire itself or the other 2 wires. I have a FSM for a S1 that shows the TPS at .3V-.4V KOEO. I have no idea what the spec is for the S2. I set my S2 originally to the S1 spec and the car functioned properly to the best of my knowledge.

Anyway take my data with a grain of salt. I am not an electrical engineer. I tried to check and recheck my data, but it could be bogus. I am mostly self taught when it comes to this stuff.

I have found 1 picture of a 96 Q45 throttle body. It had the S2 style TPS on it. So that may be of some assistance. I will not be cutting my harness to put a sensor on that doesnt have the same specs as the original unless I get absolute confirmation the system would work acceptably in that condition. I see lots of crazy wiring going on with these engines over here... Lots of smoked ECU circuits(mostly the FP relay from flyback voltage).

NicoClub 96 Q45 TB S2 TPS Sensor Thread

q452.jpg

q45.jpg

Edited by DatsunMotorSports

Confirmation...

The ANSWER is that in 1996 Non-TCS G50 Platforms with the VH45de state side definitely came with a 1 year only throttle body that utilizes the newer style TPS. So Series II "S2" RB25det Owners need to use this one year only throttle body if they want the 90mm. I cannot fit much else in my old Zed so I have to find one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
×
×
  • Create New...