Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a project car to drop an RB25de into which I picked up relatively cheap. I spotted a very reasonably price R30 hatch today which I had never considered before. After some searching I can find surprisingly little information about these cars. What suspension is in the rear? How difficult would an RB conversion be? Are they notorious or something? All I've heard is that diffs can be difficult to source.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/
Share on other sites

I'm looking for a project car to drop an RB25de into which I picked up relatively cheap. I spotted a very reasonably price R30 hatch today which I had never considered before. After some searching I can find surprisingly little information about these cars. What suspension is in the rear? How difficult would an RB conversion be? Are they notorious or something? All I've heard is that diffs can be difficult to source.

diff can be slightly harder than average to find, but really only if you are trying to find a factory lsd.

heres a tip: 720 4wd ute had a r180 diff in the front end.(nice low ratio too, 4.8) serious acceleration for a low power engine like an rb25de

main problem though with the MR30 hatch......they are ugly.(makes for a good sleeper)

cheers

Jason

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5098642
Share on other sites

ahhh the age old RB coversion thread....

it isnt overly complex to do, about 6 or so members here have done it, 20/25/30...

I think we need to get the mpderator of this sectio to make the rb convo a 'sticky' thread that always stays at the top of the list/.

Basic outline.

Use R31 engine x-member and gearbox x-member

need shortened tailshaft to suit, or a Nissan Bluebird TRX (RWD) 'need to confirm'

use RB engine mount on passenger side, l-series on drivers side

cos i havent done it myself (yet) this is all just what i remember over the last few years

if you get a Ti Hatch, you get disk brake rear end,

there are plenty of threads on here, just search...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5098769
Share on other sites

RMR30's are not ugly. They may appear ugly to jealous bastards who have never had the joy of owning one,or two.

Also I had a 720 King Cab, never Knew they came in 4WD.

oh but i DID own one......i put the drivetrain into my c210 and chopped it up into little bits and took it to the dump.

mainly because it was ugly :)

Jason

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5098934
Share on other sites

I'll settle for this!

Better than being FUGLY as the C210 coupe is.

Wonder how you would describe the R34 Jase?

D

These looks nice, but the MR30 Hatch looks ugly. (I've wrecked one)

I'm not going to mention the C210, as you might pick on my C110 :-)

Nigel

post-13098-1266788519_thumb.jpg

Edited by noddle
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5099170
Share on other sites

Aha awesome thanks guys does sound like a pretty good idea then. I really want to do a similar thing to a C110 but given the rarity of these things i'm sort of itching to put this motor in something.

I used to hate the look of them too tbh but the idea of IRS, P/S, and a nice reving RB25 for "relatively" little work and yea it would be a cute little sleeper :).

Also +1 for sticky. I think there should be sticky for all the old skylines 'conversion' given that RB's are a pretty obvious choice and i've seen quite a few especially in japan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5099187
Share on other sites

These looks nice, but the MR30 Hatch looks ugly. (I've wrecked one)

I'm not going to mention the C210, as you might pick on my C110 :-)

Nigel

Just a comment on the pic (a few posts above).

I think the red over black colour scheme works well because it makes the body shape look less bulky. (There are some nice examples of white, silver or blue over black in the old R30 Pic Thread). A good colour scheme could reduce the 'ugliness' factor.

JH

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5100377
Share on other sites

my flatmate has a manual hatch, its actually a really nice car to drive. the engine is so nice and smooth and the irs is like driving a big couch.

its for sale too if anyones looking for one, VGC mechanically, just lots of dints and rust in the tyre well, it will pass a rwc easy if you can find someone who doesnt mind rust lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5100479
Share on other sites

I'll settle for this!

Better than being FUGLY as the C210 coupe is.

Wonder how you would describe the R34 Jase?

D

well i dont own any c210s anymore, but I agree the c210 coupe is ugly, but that doesnt detract from the coolness.

i like the 2door and 4door variants of the r30, just not the hatch, i think its a poor effort on nissans part.

( i like r34 gt-r, not so much the gt-t)

cheers

Jason

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5100520
Share on other sites

Aha awesome thanks guys does sound like a pretty good idea then. I really want to do a similar thing to a C110 but given the rarity of these things i'm sort of itching to put this motor in something.

I used to hate the look of them too tbh but the idea of IRS, P/S, and a nice reving RB25 for "relatively" little work and yea it would be a cute little sleeper :) .

Also +1 for sticky. I think there should be sticky for all the old skylines 'conversion' given that RB's are a pretty obvious choice and i've seen quite a few especially in japan.

Just for the record ...... L series sound awesome when they're tweeked a bit.

I know you said you have an RB25 but how would you like about 500Nm + to play with?

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5100702
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree L series engines are awesome. But if you had a 80000km RB25 neo out of an R34 to play with.. what would you do? :P .

Probably sell it, as I did with the one I had, along with all the go fast bits I had to go with it. But my reasons were a little diferrent to yours, as the PNV is a bit rare it was a stupid move converting it to RB, best to get a whole lot of fun from an L series.

But if your going with it, there is a guy on here, lives in Melbourne and has an R30 sedan with an RB30et in it that would give you all the info you would need.

Cheers, D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309101-r30-hatch-l24e/#findComment-5101197
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...