Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PS will depend on weight input. Mine is set to 1800kg. It will only be accurate on flat ground too.

Water around 89

PS 545

Show off Scott.... lol

Water: varies.. but around 84 - 88 most days, on warmer days upto 94. (when you can see it vary it starts to get you worried)

PS: 281 (previous best on old turbo was 242, so arounf 17% improvement in power :rofl2: )

Injector Duty Cycle: 97% (@6800rpm)

Cheers

Andy

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Water seem to sit around 87-94 depending on the temp of day

when its about 12 degrees outside my In-temp is about 18 degrees at full boost. 20 degrees outside sits at about 28 degrees

my max PS said something rediculous like 985 haha. So maybe my car is faster than scotts :rofl2: lol joking. it seem to be sitting around the 250 or near abouts.

Injection % is about 89% 6580 RPM. havent seen it hit 94% again,

how do I reset the maximums? so i can get a new figure?

Show off Scott.... lol

Water: varies.. but around 84 - 88 most days, on warmer days upto 94. (when you can see it vary it starts to get you worried)

PS: 281 (previous best on old turbo was 242, so arounf 17% improvement in power :rofl2: )

Injector Duty Cycle: 97% (@6800rpm)

Cheers

Andy

Sounds like your highflow is bang on the money, Andy. Must be pretty pleased.

my best PS is 200 ATM, all done up hill thoe,, havent had a chance to find a flat area long enough to crank it, running up coast today so will get it when i pull onto motorway, see how it goes

Aaron to reset peaks, select the bar graph or meter, select the middle option 'ITEM' then press the peak reading number, it will ask if you want to reset just that peak or all peaks,

awsome thanks, with the transmission hack that Scott did for me, i noticed PS increases, as does fuel consumption and injector %. just wanna see the differences.

should write down n post it. :rofl2:

If I give mine curry then stop intraffici hit high 90's. Highest I've been was 98 then darted down side street to get some air flow. Did a nice run up to mooney mooney for work, PS 239 on flat.

i have a nismo thermostat dude!

my temps didnt change from when andy tested the informeter on my car months ago. so i rekon the fan clutch could be screwed. can i buy your spare?? :ph34r:

I wouldn't be worried... I have see 96 in stop start traffic on a warm day. Mostly sits around 84-88 otherwise but thismorning was as low as 78 at times.

yeah i guess so, this morning it never went over 95, had the AC on all the way to the city in crawling traffic. i guess the thermo helped!

anyway, i got a blitz radiator cap to keep the pressure in there so it blows something else :ph34r:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...