Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What?????

ARE YOU KIDDING ME

In the UK this IS the best you can get there is nothing that comes close do doing half the things this ebc can do

It mainly comes down to having it set up correctly performance wise as a vast amount of people out there dont understand it and chuck it in learn mode, so yeah it wont perform that well as its not set up for each car

But set it up for the car with the correct rpm boost vales and gear based boost control function and your laughing

So what have you guys got here that dose all more and better then???

haha its almost like you told him santa doesnt exist lol

if you wire in your low level indicator cut out on the power source for your ebc it will revert to stock if triggered.

excellent idea....stolen for future use too :thumbsup:

btw jjskyline79, STATUS has previously posted back to back dyno comparisons showing AVCR controlling boost poorly compared to other options...try a search on here

excellent idea....stolen for future use too :P

btw jjskyline79, STATUS has previously posted back to back dyno comparisons showing AVCR controlling boost poorly compared to other options...try a search on here

Sorry mate I just don't believe the findings

for starters he said there was no gain control on the avcr when there is

Plus I think there are quite a few that agree

http://www.skylineowners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=137822

Sorry mate I just don't believe the findings

for starters he said there was no gain control on the avcr when there is

Plus I think there are quite a few that agree

http://www.skylineowners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=137822

haha telling people who own an AVCR that it "aint all that" will always results in favourable posts.... it would be the same if i started a thread for any make of boost controller.

Datalogging various controllers over the years has been my resource of information as is the 800-900 odd cars ive had on my dyno...

If your happy with it then thats all that matters.

But blitz, Greddy, Sard & Turbosmart , all read boost pressure from the engine by vacuum hose till dashboard. Only AVCR and HKS reads them electronically using a MAP sensor correct me if im wrong??? How is the blitz quicker??? is it also closed loop???

The AVCR has all the bells and whistles built in no need to buy any extra bits but if you buy a power fc you can do even more as you no but at an added cost

As said before you can adjust the avcr to ramp up as fast or as slow as you like at any rpm in any gear so im still lost that you think its 10 years behind and has poor performance it appears to be fully adjustable or at least more adjustable then most it even monitors injector pulse to maintain stable boost, hell it want even start learning until it detects safe stable boost that's a got to be good right??? you can even set the feed back rate on its own self correction

Amongst all the other features there is even a ghost boost map graph to allow easy comparisions as well as the record function and you can have it either presented digitally in anolog or via a graph

I carnt comment on any other ebc because i've only ever used a manual bleed valve personally that i thought was crap really tbh self adjusted could'nt control the random boost spikes and creep and thought it would do more damage then good so got rid asap

I've never had any problem with any AVCR i've set up or seen any that they were slow to "ramp up" but then i would have set it up for the car and what the user wanted and i would have thought they would have said something if it was "slow"

I no people that have them and have no problem with them and have thought they out perform many other ebc on the market by leaps and bounds.

Sorry if this post sounds like im having a go but how is that 10 year behind and poor performance maybe is it to much for some people and all they want is a boost controller???

To me the AVCR is a boost controller.

Nearly all EBC's have a accurate electronic map sensor, be it internal or external... the location is not important (most high end ecus have the map sensor in cabin) and nearly all are closed loop.

It has no dedicated gain only a user programmable "openloop" duty cycle vs rpm, among other workarounds... in nearly all instances i have been able to ramp quicker withthe closed loop gain control of the Dual Solenoid blitz

All the id versions of the blitz have datalogging too in graph form with user programmable axis.. if you have the power meter you can log it against just about any input you wire it too.

TBH though the dual solenoids units by themselve's are good enough as they offer twice the sampling resolution therefore can react quicker to ramp and drop therefore eliminating all the complicated "bells and whistles" the AVCR needed to get a similar result..

haha telling people who own an AVCR that it "aint all that" will always results in favourable posts.... it would be the same if i started a thread for any make of boost controller.

Datalogging various controllers over the years has been my resource of information as is the 800-900 odd cars ive had on my dyno...

If your happy with it then thats all that matters.

Trent! What do you prefer to work with :P

Im leaning towards Gizzmo MS-IBC and I see you can supply Gizzmo too!

or second-hand blitz IDIII

Cheers :D

haha telling people who own an AVCR that it "aint all that" will always results in favourable posts.... it would be the same if i started a thread for any make of boost controller.

True but i did only ask "is it crap???" left it open for feed back

Datalogging various controllers over the years has been my resource of information as is the 800-900 odd cars ive had on my dyno...

If your happy with it then thats all that matters.

Nearly all EBC's have a accurate electronic map sensor, be it internal or external... the location is not important (most high end ecus have the map sensor in cabin) and nearly all are closed loop.

It has no dedicated gain only a user programmable "openloop" duty cycle vs rpm, among other workarounds... in nearly all instances i have been able to ramp quicker withthe closed loop gain control of the Dual Solenoid blitz

All the id versions of the blitz have datalogging too in graph form with user programmable axis.. if you have the power meter you can log it against just about any input you wire it too.

TBH though the dual solenoids units by themselve's are good enough as they offer twice the sampling resolution therefore can react quicker to ramp and drop therefore eliminating all the complicated "bells and whistles" the AVCR needed to get a similar result..

So it had close loop map sensor and a work around for gain control (in other words it has gain control) about 10 years ago and still performs well with high end more expensive ebc plus you have to buy extra add ons with the blitz where as the avcr comes with it all in one unit. Cool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I refreshed the OEM injectors with the kit and connected it up. It now ideals okay even with the IACV removed. Driving still has the same cutoff issue like the 550cc injectors so the issue is somewhere else. I bought FPG's Fuel Pump Hanger. I will be installing it next, but it is not as straightforward as I thought it was with my limited wiring knowledge and no instruction on the specific model I purchased (FPG-089). I also got the incorrect billet clamp as I could not find info on the OEM sizing.
    • Stop looking at the garage floor, and turn the radio up a bit louder if there's any strange noises...
    • No. Turbo shuffle and surge/flutter are not the same thing. Specifically, on a GTR, turbo shuffle has a definite meaning. On a GTR, the twin turbos are assumed to be the same thing and to operate the same way, exactly. In reality, they do not. Their exhaust sides are fed and exhaust a little differently, to each other. Their inlet sides are fed and exhausted a little differently, to each other. Consequently, when they are "working" they are often at slightly different points on the compressor map compared to each other. What this means, particularly when coming on boost, is that one of them will spool up and start producing extra flow compared to the other, which will put back pressure on that other compressor, which will push the operating point on that other compressor up (vertically). This will generally result in it bumping up against the surge line on the map, but even if it doesn't, it upsets the compressor and you get this surging shuffle back and forth between them That is "turbo shuffle" on a GTR. It is related to other flutter effects heard on other turbo systems, but it is a particular feature of the somewhat crappy outlet piping arrangement on RB26s. There are plenty of mods that have been attempted with varying levels of success. People have ground out and/or welded more material into the twin turbo pipe to try to prevent it. Extending the divider inside it works, removing material doesn't. There are aftermarket replacement twin turbo pipes available, and these exist pretty mush purely because of this shuffle problem.
    • You can temporarily* use lock collars to keep it in place until you can do the bushes, back the nuts off, slide them in, snug back up. *temporarily is often for ever
    • Thanks for the quick reply. To be clear, when you say turbo shuffle do you mean turbo flutter "stustustu" or referring to something else? I had thought they were the same thing. When I wrote the post my intention was to say it wasn't a flutter/compression surge sound. My understanding was that a flutter sound would be occurring when throttle is released, whereas I can keep the throttle in the same position for this noise
×
×
  • Create New...