Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my motor is currently getting rebuilt,

2.6 forged motor standard stroke 86mm pistons

Head has work done to it

Vct and custom billet cams also done to head

Precision 6766 cea billet wheel rated at 935 hp surge ported cover .84 twin scroll

6 boost twin scroll manifold

fuel system on pump fuel

Any one else run one of these 6766 billet turbos yet?

So this turbo is similar size to a gt3076r going off of the numbers its putting out?

It has a higher power rating than the 3076 I think... Yet still spools as early (well actually earlier than mine but thats different)...

Kurtis I don't like you any more, you have more powers than me :(

Nah just kidding :thumbsup:

Kurtis I don't like you any more, you have more powers than me :(

Bump your boost up to 22psi like kurtis is running and it'll probably make close to it, its only like 6-7kw...

Does it make decent power still on slightly lower boost (19ish) or do you need to run the higher boost to make it meet its potential?

Edited by Mitcho_7

It has a higher power rating than the 3076 I think... Yet still spools as early (well actually earlier than mine but thats different)...

Kurtis I don't like you any more, you have more powers than me :(

Nah just kidding :thumbsup:

Haha. They seem like the exact same setups aye.

Im curious to see what it can make with a decat ad screamer pipe

Haha. They seem like the exact same setups aye.

Im curious to see what it can make with a decat ad screamer pipe

Yeah I'd love a better exhaust to get that extra power but I'm pretty happy as is, BUT mine made it with the screamer, so Kurtis probably has more left....

Awesome result!!

Bump your boost up to 22psi like kurtis is running and it'll probably make close to it, its only like 6-7kw...

Does it make decent power still on slightly lower boost (19ish) or do you need to run the higher boost to make it meet its potential?

Both setups made very similar power at lower boost levels, 19 is still around 340 I think

Makes it sound like like it'd be an interesting comparison with a Forced Performance GT3076R-HTA - the slightly improved spool over the GT3076R isn't surprising given its for intents and purposes a 52trim 76mm compressor (like the GT3076R-HTA) with the advantages that can come with billet goodness. Wonder what the PT5558 could do on full kill, though to start with its well proven its worth by matching the GT3076R in power while spooling better.

yeh, for me its definently proved itself as a good option for people wanting something a little different than a 3076r. Do they make twin scroll turbine housings for the 5558 or is that only for the larger frame turbos like yours Jez?

Nice, twin scroll then? With that setup the 1.15 probably wouldn't have been a bad idea, but that is still going to kick all kinds of ass.... I'd put pressure on and say I'd like to see it hit 600kw ;)

When is it going on the dyno?

Nice, twin scroll then? With that setup the 1.15 probably wouldn't have been a bad idea, but that is still going to kick all kinds of ass.... I'd put pressure on and say I'd like to see it hit 600kw ;)

When is it going on the dyno?

Yeah Twin scroll. It feels fairly towy atm with it just running off the gate at 14psi. Will be very interesting to see how it compares with the old HKS T04Z. As for the tune just have to wait & see when mark has the time to come down. Hopefully within the next few weeks.

Pulled 604Hp at all 4 with T04Z on 24 psi So yeah Cant wait to see, Noticed the precision turbo is very Quiet which is a good thing I reckons.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...