Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have seen dyno sheets floating around which are probably in this post somewhere anyway - which show the difference in the response between, 6266, 6466,6766 being about 500rpm on a 3.4L ...

I have even emailed precision directly who have confirmed that it would be about 300-500rpm on a 3L

Thanks. Have seen it but not sure on that one. I think the 6262 is the one.

Thanks. Have seen it but not sure on that one. I think the 6262 is the one.

Yeah just give it a ago they are pretty interchangable apparently.

I went for the 6466 as I figure if worst case it was 600-700 difference in response from the 62-64 - something i doubt im really going to notice when its on an engine which will snap the rpm needle within a matter of seconds anyway - which is worth it considering the top end gains!

  • 2 weeks later...

Is anyone running a 6266? How much lag are we talking about between the 6262 and the 6266? Can't decide on what to go for. If the RPM difference is negligble i'd be more inclined to go with the 6266 for the potential to make more power at a later date. (Both turbos with 0.84 Twin scroll)

Looking to make 400kw on a RB26 with all the basic mods. Will a 6262 make that power on 98pump fuel (say no more than 25psi)? I've seen that SimonR32 made 420 but that was on flexfuel.

Edited by RRP1

I actually made 450kw and trust me there is plenty more in it but I ran out of fuel pump.

I wouldnt be suprised to see another 30-40kw if I ran 25psi but as you said that is on e85.

6262 is a nice balance for decent power and not too much lag. I was tossing up between it and the 6266 and went the smaller. I think I made the right decision

Edited by SimonR32

no probs....i dont think there will be too much difference to be honest but i cant find the wheel sizes for the 6266

6262 is as below tho

Compressor-

Wheel Inducer: 62mm

Wheel Exducer: 82mm

Turbine Wheel -

Wheel Inducer: 72mm

Wheel Exducer: 62mm

i think i did read that the exducer of the 66 was slightly bigger but dont quote me

PTE 6466 - for anyone looking at this turbo.

Compressor Wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer

Turbine Wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exduce

HKS T04Z:

Compressor Wheel:

T04R/T04Z, Inducer 66.7mm, Exducer 84mm.

Turbine:

T04 P trim, Inducer 74.2mm, Exducer 64.6mm

Garrett GT3540R/GT3582R/GT35R:

Compressor Wheel:

56 trim GT40, Inducer 61.2mm, Exducer 82mm.

Turbine:

84 trim GT35, Inducer 68mm, Exducer 62mm,

for comparison..

Alot of guys are running the 6466 in favour of the 6266 in the states and report no change in spool/response but more power up top.. Would like to see some results on RB26 though.

Edited by RRP1

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

PTE 6466 - for anyone looking at this turbo.

Compressor Wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer

Turbine Wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exduce

HKS T04Z:

Compressor Wheel:

T04R/T04Z, Inducer 66.7mm, Exducer 84mm.

Turbine:

T04 P trim, Inducer 74.2mm, Exducer 64.6mm

Garrett GT3540R/GT3582R/GT35R:

Compressor Wheel:

56 trim GT40, Inducer 61.2mm, Exducer 82mm.

Turbine:

84 trim GT35, Inducer 68mm, Exducer 62mm,

for comparison..

Alot of guys are running the 6466 in favour of the 6266 in the states and report no change in spool/response but more power up top.. Would like to see some results on RB26 though.

6466 only comes in ball bearing tho which is all good but cant justify the extra cash for it

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

i dont think you can go wrong the PTE to be honest

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

Should make plenty more power without being too much laggier from what I have seen

Thats interesting, I'd have hoped for it to be at least as responsive!

Well my 6262 is better than my old T04Z but not the miracle that some would lead you to believe. The 6466 is a fair wack bigger (195hp rated), I doubt you would be getting that for nothing :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
    • I've got MCA Blues on my V36 Skyline, and while I've managed to sort out issues with scrubbing/bottoming out by raising it a smidge and increasing the damping hardness, the rear end still sounds *super* noisy when driving on anything other than the flattest surface imaginable. It sounds like a small party of flamingos are just chatting away in the back, which makes me think there are several link points in the suspension contributing to the noise. Am I hearing dried out/worn bushings? None of it sounds like metal-on-metal, it sounds more like hard rubber squeaking on metal. It's been suggested that a bit of silicon spray on each bushing might quiet them down, but I'm not sure what material the current bushings are made of (probably factory, I imagine) and whether silicon spray will degrade that material.
    • The obvious answer here is get a ND2/3 RF with the Targa top. The red is nicer, too!
×
×
  • Create New...