Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It also runs a percision turbo, think its a 7xxx. 1060awhp I think it made at Downshift Dyno day. Nitto 3.2 stroker in it.

Nitto was on a 7675 and 43-ish PSI when it made 845awhp on the stock bottom end i'm pretty sure.

Nitto was on a 7675 and 43-ish PSI when it made 845awhp on the stock bottom end i'm pretty sure.

Yeah that was on their RB26 motor they had. Think that one died lol. The stroked 3.2 is the new"ish" engine that makes 1060awhp.

Will be interesting to see what times it runs once they fix their issues. 160mph is bloody fast!

Here is the what it looks like to pull off a 6766 and put on a 6466 both tuned to run on 93 oct. at 23.5 psi blue lines are the 6466

Still needs cleaned up a bit but I like the look of it. :yes:

IMG_0866_zps8c498885.jpg

Edited by Weapon X

More details of the type of car? I'd guess from the weak early power delivery and rpm that it's an RB26 with big cams?

Awesome power, surprised there wasn't that big of an improvement in spool between the two - without boost curve overlay it's easy to assume the 6466 just has a little more midrange boost pushed into it

The 64mm compressor seems to not flow a huge amount short of the 6766, I think it makes the 6766 redundant and those who want to go to the next level up in power from the 6466 should be looking at one of the HTA units - especially on an RB.

The lack of spool difference on the dyno is a surprise, though I'd expect that transient response will paint a different picture - unless there is something else unaccounted for in that comparison.

  • Like 1

RB28 with Tomei 270 cams ,Full Race header, Precision 6466 ,head work, Tomei cam gears ,3 5/8 down pipe to 4" , Magna Fuel Pro tuner pump, -10 to the front ,-8 to a sard rail ,2 -6 returns 1000 cc ID's ,2 Precision 38 mm waste gates, EGT per cylinder ,AEM , the normal stuff.

My modification to a Full Race header to keep heat away.

0292.jpg

Edited by Weapon X

I wonder if that is reaching the potential of the turbine wheel or if there just isn't that much between the 64 and 67mm compressors?

What im being told is the 6466 is just starting at this boost gets better as it goes up.

The 64mm compressor seems to not flow a huge amount short of the 6766, I think it makes the 6766 redundant and those who want to go to the next level up in power from the 6466 should be looking at one of the HTA units - especially on an RB.

The lack of spool difference on the dyno is a surprise, though I'd expect that transient response will paint a different picture - unless there is something else unaccounted for in that comparison.

It's 4th gear pulls but I thought it would spool like 300 rpm sooner but they data logs look almost the same just more efficient wheel for that rpm in this powers case I guess

Edited by Weapon X

RB28 with Tomei 270 cams ,Full Race header, Precision 6466 ,head work, Tomei cam gears ,3 5/8 down pipe to 4" , Magna Fuel Pro tuner pump, -10 to the front ,-8 to a sard rail ,2 -6 returns 1000 cc ID's ,2 Precision 38 mm waste gates, EGT per cylinder , the normal stuff.

My modification to a Full Race header to keep heat away.

So it's your car? How does it compare before and after to drive? Its really good power but that lag looks much worse than I would have expected, especially on a stroker! Seems like a very nice setup otherwise, nice work :)

So it's your car? How does it compare before and after to drive? Its really good power but that lag looks much worse than I would have expected, especially on a stroker! Seems like a very nice setup otherwise, nice work :)

Yes this ones mine. It's still setting on the Dyno i'm going to make a few more pulls in the cool morning air and maybe try adjusting the valve timing a bit I'm setting on zero on both now.

I'm going to try to advance the intake a bit then retard the exhaust just to see. We have 3 other customer cars to finish...

Yes lag blows.

Fingers crossed it can improve a little bit, though I'm guessing its not going to be a huge amount better. Would have liked to have seen it all in by mid 4000rpm on a 2.8 - at least when not running a huge amount of boost.


Let us know how you find the 6466 vs the 6766... and on that note, how did the 6766 drive?

yes it will.

small rear housing.

bb cartridge.

.84 with the twin scroll ?

or is this to small and all it will do is generate heat?

motor is a standard 2.6 but will be built once it blows want a 2.8 kit

Interesting to note the SR22VET is superior on all accounts. Its over half a litre smaller.

It goes to show that cylinder head technology pays out a lot more than cubes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...