Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sooo true. This is only one example from each turbo. I am not sure if the dyno I chose for the HKS 3037 is really doing it justice. Found it on page 25 of the rb25 dyno thread so if you have a better one let me know. I try and find stock engines and roughly 17psi tapering off to around 15.

Wow I'm impressed by the 2835. Very smooth curve, more than enough power for a street car and with basically standard response.

PU makes some impressive midrange power after reaching full boost but the trade off appears to be quite a bit of lag and fade off heading towards upper rpm. As long as you keep within that powerband it looks like a good performer.

As said it's not gospel - we don't know the extent of modification on the cars tested but other than that the general shapes of the curves appear to be pretty accurate.

Great idea Harvey. I am freaking out about my turbo selection now, I went and bought a 3071R (real spec) in 0.63A/R, but I keep being told that I should have gone with a 2871R instead for chasing a responsive 250-260kw? Is there any way to add a 2871R (HKS GT-RS) to the chart, just for comparison? And maybe show the exhaust A/R to legend?

Thanks mate!

I run the GT-RS... its a pretty good turbo! Makes 253rwkw on 14psi. Lots of other supporting work as well tho. Either way, I think you will be happy with the 3071R. I cant imagine it would be too different in its spool. The GT-RS offers crazy response for the street tho!

I run the GT-RS... its a pretty good turbo! Makes 253rwkw on 14psi. Lots of other supporting work as well tho. Either way, I think you will be happy with the 3071R. I cant imagine it would be too different in its spool. The GT-RS offers crazy response for the street tho!

Post up (or link) your dyno and I will add it in to the chart.

Post up (or link) your dyno and I will add it in to the chart.

Take your pic as to which one. without over laying them I think they are pretty close for two different dynos :cool:

Keep in mind this car has HKS cams which should increase midrange (plazmaman plenum, some head porting). For that reason its up to you whether you add it or not, considering you are looking more towards stock engine turbo upgrade comparisons? :P

post-41581-1270011897_thumb.jpg

post-41581-1270012502_thumb.jpg

Hey good idea.

I use Excel quite a bit - so i knocked up one of the ones Ash was talking about where you tick the box and it adds/removes the item,

Feel free to use this one if its easier & If it can be uploaded into SAU go for it - if not - don't worr about it :cool:

I know its not a common one but I'll post up my RB25 with HKS 2530 when I get the new Dyno sheet.

Cheers,

Disregard the numbers - they are all made up!

SAU_Turbo_Chart.xls

Ok HKS GTRS added

Interesting granthem your dyno finishes around 175kph or 6200rpm. What happens after that? Just flat?

Nope, thats my limiter! (thats actually my car reving to 7200rpm in 4th gear on both dyno runs). Dont ask me why, but its got short ass gearing. Maybe it has shorter diff gears then the standard 4.11s, or the actual gearbox has different gearing (I think it might have some straight cut gears, whines like a bitch)

Either way, thats all the way to limiter (7200rpm) in 4th on both runs. Something aint stock :P

What exhaust housing are you running Granthem?

Unknown dump, RSR 3.5 front and 3.5 from the cat back from memory. Still running a cat too, but its getting on now and is cracked and shitty. Still, pulling ok figures i guess

With the 2x PU highflowed curves tipping off this is due to the stock actuator been too soft. (didn't have high pressure actuators and wastegate controller back then). They are capable of making lot more power then that at full potential.

Also please try to map kwickr33's ATR43G4 dyno reading. I believe that is a very interesting read out.

Shame there isn't a dyno plot of the GT3076R showing its full strength in there - you see the slight compromise in low down over the GT2835, and not the top end roar.

Fwiw, GT3037 and GT3076R are exactly the same - so really you could just stipulate "GT3037/GT3076R - .xxa/r" as the a/r bit is going to be the only thing which changes the spool and top end flow.

Don Dada - btw, slightly OT threw the Skyline for a power run at a local car event just to test the cars behaviour and determine if its ready for tuning. The internal gate is still a little lazy compared to an external but far better than before, hits 1bar by 3600ishrpm then eases off its aggression in spool (wastegate easing open) to hit 17psi by just over 4000rpm - where it holds flat enough to redline that it could have been done with a pencil and a ruler.

Power figure inconsequential at this point, fat as hell fuelling at that boost level as its not been tuned to do anything other than not pop - hopefully will be sorted very shortly now I know its all good to go... then I might be able to add a revised IG GT30R result :D

With the 2x PU highflowed curves tipping off this is due to the stock actuator been too soft. (didn't have high pressure actuators and wastegate controller back then). They are capable of making lot more power then that at full potential.

Also please try to map kwickr33's ATR43G4 dyno reading. I believe that is a very interesting read out.

Well post up the revised PU high flow on a stock engine and show us.

I am hesitant to post up kwickr33s dyno as he has worked heads, therefore not being equal to the other dynos.

Shame there isn't a dyno plot of the GT3076R showing its full strength in there - you see the slight compromise in low down over the GT2835, and not the top end roar.

Post one up then. I just chose the first one I could find in the dyno thread that had a stock engine and looked like it was running well.

Edited by Harey

Ok now with Hypergear ATR3G4 and updated HKS GTRS. For both of these dynos they hit the rev limiter just after 170kph which earlier than what the other cars here are doing. I have modified the speed per rpm for these two and set 7000rpm = 170kph. They both seem to be have very low power down low which doesnt seem right. Dynosheets with rpm are much preferred. rpm per speed seems to vary quite a bit between cars ??

post-29432-1270084535_thumb.jpg

Hmmm yeh mine does look pretty poor down low. A comparable car to mine is PM-R33, and he has dyno graphs lying around here somewhere I think. It ended up with around 263rwkw on 20psi i think.

Still, I always thought my gearing was shorter, and now i know it is!

Hmmm yeh mine does look pretty poor down low. A comparable car to mine is PM-R33, and he has dyno graphs lying around here somewhere I think. It ended up with around 263rwkw on 20psi i think.

Still, I always thought my gearing was shorter, and now i know it is!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...