Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ye, mine is hand made, mufflers and all - super custom...

Either way forget the 3" people... he needs 3.5-4" given the power/turbo's he has.

Just go down to any reputable exhaust place near you... or whoever put your car together (im sure they know someone).

Tell them quite simply that you want:

- 3.5" or 4" exhaust

- Twin mufflers.

- Mufflers must be straight through, and must be as big as can possibly fit.

- No big cannon tips. If the rear muffler is 3.5", 3.5" tip etc.

You'll then have a much quieter exhaust than you do now - for about the same cost once you sell off the old exhaust.

There is no issue using restrictors, just control your right foot. It's really not that hard.

I drove around with a restrictor in for 8 months, never took the car past 50% throttle and 3500rpm.

Ye, mine is hand made, mufflers and all - super custom...

Either way forget the 3" people... he needs 3.5-4" given the power/turbo's he has.

Just go down to any reputable exhaust place near you... or whoever put your car together (im sure they know someone).

Tell them quite simply that you want:

- 3.5" or 4" exhaust

- Twin mufflers.

- Mufflers must be straight through, and must be as big as can possibly fit.

- No big cannon tips. If the rear muffler is 3.5", 3.5" tip etc.

You'll then have a much quieter exhaust than you do now - for about the same cost once you sell off the old exhaust.

There is no issue using restrictors, just control your right foot. It's really not that hard.

I drove around with a restrictor in for 8 months, never took the car past 50% throttle and 3500rpm.

thank you mate.

I know I can't control my foot, its hard for me sometime:) I think I better leave the silencer, I don't want make any damage.

do you know HKS SUPER TURBO MUFFLER? on HKS website they rate it 600hp. because I will keep small twin turbo setup forever, so no way pass 600hp.

if this catback not suit for me, I will find some good exhaust shop to made one.:P

The theory of "blocking your nose and see how hard you can blow" may not apply to an exhaust silencer :P

I ran one for like a year on my old S15 that was fairly modified, caned it senseless on a daily basis and it did no damage.

No your dilemma though. I got a 3" Nismo catback on mine, sooo quiet at lower revs, but may need to to go 3.5" and i still want quiet..

Hi everyone, i have full exhaust system, HKS dump and front pipe, trust 94mm catback, it is just too loud for everyday drive. my car made 340KW on 1.45bar, 280KW on 1bar, if I use silencer and low boost, drive it hard, will it damage the engine (maybe too much back pressure)?? i can hear the noise of air resistance when full boost (1bar) over 5k or 6k rpm.

I tried many exhaust shop, only 2 option to quiet my exhaust: 1 is change a small system, 2 is put the silencer in.

anyone give some idea??? i don't want damage the engine by using a silencer:(

thanks!

100% will damage it. if you drive it hard.

100% will damage it. if you drive it hard.

I understand it will damage if drive it very hard. but i mean foot down occasionally and on low boost which is about 14psi. not like drag race, or quick ran on mountain.

but anywhy i need a new system:)

My 2c, if your on a budget and cant replace exhaust at moment, get the apexi ecv but with 95mm internal diameter. its not the flange type, its the pipe one. My car makes over 600rwkw and the thing hasnt broken yet and it does make a difference. \

My 2c, if your on a budget and cant replace exhaust at moment, get the apexi ecv but with 95mm internal diameter. its not the flange type, its the pipe one. My car makes over 600rwkw and the thing hasnt broken yet and it does make a difference. \

Over 600Rwkw?!!!!!! got any pics??? i wanna see this beast mate!

My 2c, if your on a budget and cant replace exhaust at moment, get the apexi ecv but with 95mm internal diameter. its not the flange type, its the pipe one. My car makes over 600rwkw and the thing hasnt broken yet and it does make a difference. \

mate you have 600rwkw with a ecv? how big your pipe is?

can you go full throttle with ecv??

Edited by Nosure

have you guys actually tried to hit boost with a big turbocharger and a restricted exhaust?

The turbo wont even spool up when i had my exhaust restricted. Not sure about other cars though

have you guys actually tried to hit boost with a big turbocharger and a restricted exhaust?

The turbo wont even spool up when i had my exhaust restricted. Not sure about other cars though

yes mate, that what I thought. but my car is easy go up tp 14psi with a silencer. I never tried 20psi.

PS: my turbo is not that big:) only 2 baby t517z

Edited by Nosure
My 2c, if your on a budget and cant replace exhaust at moment, get the apexi ecv but with 95mm internal diameter. its not the flange type, its the pipe one. My car makes over 600rwkw and the thing hasnt broken yet and it does make a difference. \

I just bought a apexi ecv 95mm pipe type.

hope this will work, and no resistance when its open.

:thumbsup:

have you guys actually tried to hit boost with a big turbocharger and a restricted exhaust?

The turbo wont even spool up when i had my exhaust restricted. Not sure about other cars though

thank god at last sombody not just talking shit on the internet! another clasic full of shit thread thanks lads! i agree with guilt toy by the way,unless its like a 1 inch exhaust you may meld somthing due to heat restriction!

Edited by aerofocker
have you guys actually tried to hit boost with a big turbocharger and a restricted exhaust?

The turbo wont even spool up when i had my exhaust restricted. Not sure about other cars though

maybe you got a external wastegate??

i think the actuator type's turbo will still spool up fine with restricted exhaust.

Edited by Nosure

If you put a silencer in, you are effectively making the exhaust what, 2" maybe less? (depending on outlet size).

If you then intend to even ATTEMPT to put your foot down you are going to do some severe overall damage without question.

That much backpressure with turbo's that flow that much is never going to end pretty

tell me about this severe overall damage? the car will be laggy and lose loads of power all over the range and retain heat in the general exhaust area fair enough.

I want to know what dammage you speak of?

You don't just get heat in the exhaust area, there will be excessive heat everywhere...

Try it and see, you can cook the motor. There will be heaps of extra heat in the head, warped head? blown head gaskets? valve issues?

Hell get it too hot and then you can also cause detonation and we all know what happens next.

Your turn.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...