Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just to confirm , did someone mention you can use the std R33 throttle cable with this plenum ?

Also one for Mercury , I don't suppose its possible to use the GTt runners and PM plenum on an R33 ?

Would there be any gain or just lots of grief for no real purpose .

Lastly , WHAT is the size of the R33 std throttle plate ? PM site shows a 66mm throttlebody as their smallest offering so whats the difference between this and the std R33 25DET throttle plate size ?

Cheers Adrian .

VR Commodore 5L cable :P

Lastly , WHAT is the size of the R33 std throttle plate ? PM site shows a 66mm throttlebody as their smallest offering so whats the difference between this and the std R33 25DET throttle plate size ?

Cheers Adrian .

Standard throttle plate is a touch under 63mm.

I'm currently looking at a new intake manifold/plenum for my '93 GTS25T, and am probably going down the route of a custom built one. The Plazmaman one is certainly better for my purposes (DD and HPDE - road circuit), as it keeps the longer runners. What's the entry to the runners look like from the inside of the plenum? I've never been able to find a picture of inside the plenum to see if they use flared entries. If someone with a unit off the car and with no TB on it could snap a shot of the internals, I'd appreciate it!

I'm still concerned about 2 design issues of this plenum:

1. Air still needs to make a tight 90* bend into the runners from the plenum. This is going to affect both air speed and turbulence within the plenum.

2. Though offsetting the TB helps, air distribution will not be equal across all runners. Without doing some comprehensive CFD modelling, it looks like air will either focus on runners #3 & 4 (where TB is "aimed") or #6 (common problem for any type of log-style plenum with TB at one end).

The approach I'm possibly taking with mine is to use a dual-chamber design that feeds air into the main plenum equally across the length of the chamber, and parallel to the runner inlets. If anyone is interested, I've started my design/build thread here:

Custom RB25DET intake manifold/plenum

BTW - I'm not a business and this is not a "commercial" response to this thread. Just doing this on my own!

Yes an interesting , I take Vizard to be David Vizard and I like his experience (thousands of hours flow bench testing) based ideas on most engine design things .

You may find it interesting to dust off Corky Bells Maximum Boost , it has a chapter on inlet manifold design .

From memory he reckons the radius of entry into the runners should be equal to the diameter of the runner .

Also according to him there should be three times the diameter of the runner clear as in no other runners bell mouth within this "3d" area .

As for the shape of PMs plenum . As soon as I saw it I thought that's along the lines of a Nissan FJ20 plenum only with six runners instead of four .

With the DR30 Skyline type FJ20 inlet manifold the throttlebody also "aims" if you like the airstream along a curved back wall of the plenum rather that straight across the six inlet holes .

I think the fact that you are getting individual pressure drops as each cylinders inlet valves open means the challenge is to be able to feed each one adequately and as equally as possible .

I also reckon that there is something to be gained by using two three cylinder plenums obviously with their own throttlebody , this is common on V6 engines but possibly hard to package on an inline 6 .

The I6 firing (and induction) order 153624 means that as it goes through its 6 cycles their is alternate drawing through each group (front 3/back 3) so maybe something to be gained .

If you look at the Z32 VG30 four cam engine you can see that Nissan went to a bit of trouble to keep the runners reasonably long and the two plenums of reasonable volume .

Yeah I reckon two plenums and two throttlebodies gets you to halfway between what a single vs the RB26s six throttles achieve throttle response and cylinder filling wise .

One thing I have noticed missing on all these plenums is a staged twin throttle plate arrangement where the primary one opens to a point and then the second one , often larger , goes from closed to full open over say the second half of the accelerator pedals travel .

That may be the way to give good low speed (car and engine) driveability and still be able to open a large passage to try to keep up high rev volumetric efficiency .

I guess the hard bit is always going to be getting good breathing characteristics in a non supercharged state and with turbo engines typically lower CR and relatively soft cam profiles . I think the go is to have very low restriction yet with runners long enough to give some ram effect into the cylinders at low revs . The transition to the runners and the runners themselves is probably more important that the plenum volume but it and the throttle/s obviously need to be able to feed as well as possible in a pre boosted state .

Possibly this is why Simon Gisgus (sp ?) of Nispro used to say that the best way was to build the best NA engine possible and turbocharge that .

Corky adds that the turbocharger just goes on to add more air when its spinning fast enough .

Food for thought ?

Cheers A .

Yes an interesting , I take Vizard to be David Vizard and I like his experience (thousands of hours flow bench testing) based ideas on most engine design things .

You may find it interesting to dust off Corky Bells Maximum Boost , it has a chapter on inlet manifold design.

Vizard = David Vizard (Vizard the Wizard :-)

I've got Bell's book as well, in addition to a bunch of others (Smokey Yunick in particular. Might have developed everything on American iron, but the theory still applies).

I also reckon that there is something to be gained by using two three cylinder plenums obviously with their own throttlebody , this is common on V6 engines but possibly hard to package on an inline 6. The I6 firing (and induction) order 153624 means that as it goes through its 6 cycles their is alternate drawing through each group (front 3/back 3) so maybe something to be gained.

The approach I'm thinking of taking is to force the incoming air from the throttle body through a long channel that is almost the entire length of the plenum, so that all parts of the plenum (and therefore runner inlets) get the same volume of air at the same velocity. I think that is key.

One thing I have noticed missing on all these plenums is a staged twin throttle plate arrangement where the primary one opens to a point and then the second one , often larger , goes from closed to full open over say the second half of the accelerator pedals travel. That may be the way to give good low speed (car and engine) driveability and still be able to open a large passage to try to keep up high rev volumetric efficiency.

I like your way of thinking. I might look into how those are designed and see how it might be integrated into the overall design.

Reppin' Plazmaman :)

1271062629.jpg

How do these go height wise with a rb30 bottom end?

Do they foul the bonnet, plus they run pretty close the strut brace

About to ditch my greddy copy install and use one of these

Rb25 Neo with future rb30 bottom end in mind

I have been told by Plazmaman that they can be "made to fit" without hitting the bonnet with a 30 bottom end. What that actually means I do not know as I didn't really ask. However if your serious about it just give them a call and ask what you have to do.

I thought the same thing, that surely it would hit the bonnet on the front.

Edited by PM-R33
We made custom lowered engine mounts to get it to fit. Was much better than spacing down the subframe.

What model car?

My layout is a bit different being a Stagea with r34 gtr front.

How did you go fitting one to a R34 Rb25 NEO?

Throttle body hit the fuse box?

We made the mounts for a R32 GTST with RB25/30. Sat the sump just above the cross member and it just clears the bonnet.

Not sure about the fuse box as we have only had a neo engine in the VC commodore, so everything was custom. If it did hit, we would just move it out the way. :)

I have spoken with Plazmaman a few times in the last couple of days. Looks like I might get one sent up in a "just tacked together" state for trial fitting, then send it back to get finish with any mods needed.

Vizard = David Vizard (Vizard the Wizard :-)

I've got Bell's book as well, in addition to a bunch of others (Smokey Yunick in particular. Might have developed everything on American iron, but the theory still applies).

The approach I'm thinking of taking is to force the incoming air from the throttle body through a long channel that is almost the entire length of the plenum, so that all parts of the plenum (and therefore runner inlets) get the same volume of air at the same velocity. I think that is key.

I like your way of thinking. I might look into how those are designed and see how it might be integrated into the overall design.

are you talking about something along the lines of this?

IMG_1560%20(Large).JPG

are you talking about something along the lines of this?

Yes, with a long slot in between the first and second plenums (and longer runners).

Here's a closer design:

dual_c10.jpg

In this design, the vertical slats help to smooth and direct the flow of air.

(trust me, I turned my back on a lucrative Engineering career to follow my passion of jap perf cars).

Lucrative...damn i wish i knew where to find one :cool:

Any experience of the Plazmaman inlet manifolds on RB20s? I am running a 6boost manifold with TD06-20G (with 8cm housing) making 260rwkws at 19psi. How best would you describe the change in engine performance characteristics? Mine is sitting in the boot of the car and this thread has just about convinced me to get it installed. Also very interested to hear your thoughts on whether its worthwhil ebumping up the throttle body size when you go aftermarket plenum.

gallery_462_50_59282.jpg

I am just in the process of changing from the std Greddy exhaust manifold to the 6boost. I am hoping the combination of the 6boost manifold and plenum may be enough to allow me bump up the exhaust housing size to 10cm. At the moment the engine simply stops making power at 20psi, so seems the little 8cm is choking its top end...lol its all a big trade off with only 2l >_<

But ideally it would be nice to be able to run 22psi and make 280-290rwkws, and hopefully not lose too much in the spool with the bigger housing.

In this design, the vertical slats help to smooth and direct the flow of air.

Just a question, do you really want to be smoothing the airflow? You want turbulent flow so that when its on its way down the runners its still bouncing around in an excited state and when the injectors squirt away you are getting good mixing. Its all rpm dependant...but...as a rule

The plazmaman is a very well designed plenum for midrange power, i have one on my forged 25/30 with a gt35r 0.82 turbo and i actually make more power than my standard rb25 with its standard turbo across the entire revv range, the only point it even gets slightly close is at 2700RPM, before and especially after that it just gets blown away and manages full boost very close to 3500 rpm... There is definitely a lot of pros for the plenum, my only problem with it is that its extremely hard to work around the intake side of the engine bay when changing anything like the oil filter.. it takes up alot of space.. but id definately still pick it over a greddy plenum

also the standard throttle body narrows down very close to 60mm, the plazmamans nice shiny tb is 72mm :cool: which is roughly 44% bigger.. has anyone managed to fit in a strut brace over a 25/30 in a r33 engine bay without having to lower the cross member? (i know it would depend on the brace)

Just a question, do you really want to be smoothing the airflow? You want turbulent flow so that when its on its way down the runners its still bouncing around in an excited state and when the injectors squirt away you are getting good mixing. Its all rpm dependant...but...as a rule

I doubt you'd be able to do so to a point where air in the intake is anything but turbulent, mate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...