Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey I'm wanting to make a RB30 hybrid that's strictly NA and high revving. Just would like to know what to do and what not to do, as well as where I can save money, full list of parts I'm going to need, etc. I'm looking at having a budget of between $5,000 and $10,000 this is to go into a 1990 BNR32

Edited by Mi5Fi7
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317404-high-revving-rb30-hybrid/
Share on other sites

Start with a re-freshed rb26 head with custom NA cams. Keep the ITB's and throw some ram tubes on the induction side- You'll need to run a MAP sensor based ecu. Custom exhuast manifold/headers and exhaust.

Bottom end will need alot of work, machined up crank, really good rods and lightweight high comp pistons... not to mention a super oil pump/collar, ballancer, light weight pullies, lightweight flywheel and clutch and a wholle lot of ballancing.

Expect to spend 10k and still produce less power than a lightly boosted rb25.

If you want anymore than 9000rpm then start looking at a custom billet counter weighted cranks, alluminium rods and a dry sump oiling system.... so double your budget.

been doing some reading on rb30's lately...

seems the average rpm limit is approx 7k, not exactly high revving. According to places like wikipedia (not the foremost experts in the field) 10k can be acheived with a lot of balancing.

So, given that the 30 block can be bought cheap, 26 head for lets say 3 grand (not sure what you'd use for an rb30 na to tbh... 25de head?? 1.5k?)... rods and pistons for lets say another 1.5 grand. thats 4.5k fore bits leaving 5.5k for all labour, prep work AND balancing.

Not sure how far 5.5k-6.5 will get you in those terms.

You probably wouldn't want a MAP sensor with high end cams and ITB's, probably better off with a Q45 AFM. I agree that RB26 head is the way to go, solid lifters, ITB's alot of high lift/duration cams and no vct (adj cam gears on intake and exhaust).

With a balance, RB25DE pistons >225whp would be easy

With higher rev's you will have to do some research into oil pumps & restrictor setups as well

And if you only wanted to rev to ~ 8000rpm, you could get this http://www.spoolimports.com/content/SPOOLN...TROKERCRANK.asp :(

With some thing like that, I'm sure you could net ~ 250hp :(

Edited by SKiT_R31

Ok, firstly you say its for a BNR32, but your profile thing says BNR32 GTS. Do you mean a GTS, or a GTR? If you mean GTS, that is not a BNR32, the "BN" code is for GTR only, please keep that in mind when we're all trying to help as it could mean different answers/parts in your case

Secondly, why do you want it to rev so high?

Mine (RB2630DETT) on its old tune, had the limiter at 9500rpm and i revved it that high. Now its a tad lower as the wear on the rotating assembly isnt worth being able to rev it that 1000rpm more. Especially when it makes so much more low end grunt than the 26 it replaced.

What sort of power goal are you trying to reach?

Are you on p plates? If you are, and you plan to turbo the car in the future, drive it as is until you get to that point and only spend money on fuel, oils and filters. Save every dollar for the build that you'll keep for a long time.

If you are doing this to maximise the speed out of the car you're allowed to have under the p plate laws, dont forget to get rid of any weight thats not needed in the car (big silly stereo etc)

At 10,000rpm there's a LOT going on in any motor, its not just a case of choosing a number out of the air that sounds cool and going with that :ermm:

And if you only wanted to rev to ~ 8000rpm, you could get this http://www.spoolimports.com/content/SPOOLN...TROKERCRANK.asp :ermm:

With some thing like that, I'm sure you could net ~ 250hp :D

Funny someone mentions this kit.

My next motor which is being built now, is bigger than that spool kit, better rod stroke ratio, and will rev without issue to 9000rpm plus.

Yes, still inside an RB block. For an NA application is would be an animal, but turbos are too much fun :blush:

Edit: If this is a car being built for twisty roads with pretty much no long straights, even 250hp at the wheels could be a real blast to drive with such instant throttle response

Funny someone mentions this kit.

My next motor which is being built now, is bigger than that spool kit, better rod stroke ratio, and will rev without issue to 9000rpm plus.

Yes, still inside an RB block. For an NA application is would be an animal, but turbos are too much fun :ermm:

Edit: If this is a car being built for twisty roads with pretty much no long straights, even 250hp at the wheels could be a real blast to drive with such instant throttle response

Sorry for the minor hijack. However, in your opinion, which method of increasing displacement in an RB 25/26 to you know of has the 'best' stroke ratio of the available options??

^ There are calculators on the net about stroke vs RPM, they work it out by calculating the speed of the explosion vs the distance it has to travel i.e. it cant pass mach 0.5 or something (I'm really rusty on this, looked it up years ago)

N1GTR, what crank and size bore are you running? Do you know what these kits cost?

I've been pondering a new build for a while now, and i was thinking of keeping the compression a bit lower this time (10.5 - 11.0:1) GTR head/ITB's, and stroker, aiming for 250whp with some meatier cams (only after 7500 - 8000rpm limit though, want peak power at 7000).

Ok, firstly you say its for a BNR32, but your profile thing says BNR32 GTS. Do you mean a GTS, or a GTR? If you mean GTS, that is not a BNR32, the "BN" code is for GTR only, please keep that in mind when we're all trying to help as it could mean different answers/parts in your case

Secondly, why do you want it to rev so high?

Mine (RB2630DETT) on its old tune, had the limiter at 9500rpm and i revved it that high. Now its a tad lower as the wear on the rotating assembly isnt worth being able to rev it that 1000rpm more. Especially when it makes so much more low end grunt than the 26 it replaced.

What sort of power goal are you trying to reach?

Are you on p plates? If you are, and you plan to turbo the car in the future, drive it as is until you get to that point and only spend money on fuel, oils and filters. Save every dollar for the build that you'll keep for a long time.

If you are doing this to maximise the speed out of the car you're allowed to have under the p plate laws, dont forget to get rid of any weight thats not needed in the car (big silly stereo etc)

At 10,000rpm there's a LOT going on in any motor, its not just a case of choosing a number out of the air that sounds cool and going with that :blush:

Sorry for the mix up with that I've only just bought the car not long ago and still don't know much about it, if the GTR is the BN does that make mine a HR?

I've always liked the idea of making the hybrid RB30/RB26 engine, I don't plan on putting a turbo on it I just want to keep it NA, and it's the car and engine I plan on keeping for a long time.

With the revving so high, I've always liked that to since my bike that I own doesn't start redline until 19,500rpm. So I thought that would be cool, but that's why i'm on here asking you guys about it, because you have the know how and honestly I know very little about what I'm doing so all help in appreciated. :ermm:

With a power goal I just wont it to be the best I can make it without forced induction.

Thanks again for all the help.

shame you just bought one, i saw a post in the last 24h's where a rb26de is up for sale in japan.

As for high reving, high reving is good... but 10k rpm is ALOT. and for an rb30 it would need major balancing and a big spend.

Keep in mind you bike only has tiny moving parts, so high rpm is no biggy.

my rule of thumb is big displacement == slow lazy torque, low disp == high strung power.

you can mix the two but its not always cost effective.

RB30 isn't really meant to be revved hard.

However it will have much more poke in the low to mid range in comparison to the RB25 and RB26 - Which will make it easier to drive on the twisties.

I'd say around 7500RPM would be a safe limit - even at that RPM you would be pushing much more power than the lower displacement RBs.

There really is no replacement for displacement. :ermm:

Another thing to consider "if" you ever decided to go turbo - the RB26/30 will be able to spin that turbo much earlier in the rev range - which will make it faster overall.

Sorry for the minor hijack. However, in your opinion, which method of increasing displacement in an RB 25/26 to you know of has the 'best' stroke ratio of the available options??

I'm not an engine builder, but my stock stroke rb30 is fine. The new one is 1.546, which to put into perspective, hks 2.8 (we all know how revvy they are) is 1.5, tomei 2.8 is 1.6. Most builders will tell you anything from 1.5 to 1.65 ideal for rb motors

^ There are calculators on the net about stroke vs RPM, they work it out by calculating the speed of the explosion vs the distance it has to travel i.e. it cant pass mach 0.5 or something (I'm really rusty on this, looked it up years ago)

N1GTR, what crank and size bore are you running? Do you know what these kits cost?

I've been pondering a new build for a while now, and i was thinking of keeping the compression a bit lower this time (10.5 - 11.0:1) GTR head/ITB's, and stroker, aiming for 250whp with some meatier cams (only after 7500 - 8000rpm limit though, want peak power at 7000).

It's a custom billet full counterweight crank, 87mm bore.

The kits will be commercially available once I successfully test mine to the 400kw mark

don't plan to build a high revving motor just for the sake of it and because your bike can. for a motor to rev high reliably it needs to be set up for it in the first place. there will be a limit as to how much it will take without spending stupid amounts of money. and the higher you go, the more money it will take to make it go that little bit higher again. also getting an engine to rev high can result in a loss of low end power, meaning that if you plan on driving it as a daily driver it can end up being a real cop. you bike would be a prime example. i bet that if you rode around keeping it below 8,000 or 10,000 it wouldn't have much go now would it.

there would be at least $5k in parts alone for the head to cop 10k rpm, let alone all the port work it would need to flow enough air at that rpm.

then intake and exhaust manifolds would need to be custom for an NA engine...and that would mean megga dollars in development to get them to work properly and make power.

By now you would be well into 5 figures without touching the bottom end

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...