Jump to content
SAU Community

Hair colour  

118 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I take it BOZ likes women and not 13 yr old boys.

no, Boz likes beached whales. :)

are saying that slim girls are young boys and real women are plump and wobbely, or are you reffering to just breast size?

If your got a thing for girls who look like 13 yr old boys then its all good in this day and age, but, if you like women with stuff its better.

So are you honestly saying that Miranda Kerr looks like a 13yr old boy??? Do you wear glasses, if not you should get your eyes checked and if you do, are they broken!!

You wand big and giggly, here's one for ya

FatLadyCheetos.jpg

I don't get this "10/11/12/13/14 year old boy" shit when referring to girls who aren't fat. Why is a boy the first thing you think of when you see a thin girl? Like, why aren't you saying 10/11/12/13/14 year old girl? Cause plenty of them have small boobs and small bodies too.

I'm pretty sure it's just a way to bag guys who like thin girls by making them out to be homosexual at the same time, for whatever reason.

OMG - In the quest to look for pictures of brunettes and skylines.... I came across this.

Type "brunette skyline" in Google and click the first result (I best not put a link - cause it ain't safe for any situation)

All I can say is that white R34 needs a rear wing and some better looking wheels..

Birds... I think he's just saying that something with at least a little bit of substance is better. I'm not going to start explaining how much I dislike /any/ sort of too skinny person but yeah, I would agree that Miranda Kerr is not that attractive as there's nothing there. She looks like she's about to pass out from lack of food. It wouldn't be fun to have to keep your body like that anyway. I have a tummy and I like it, so does my bf. :3

Fat should be replaced with muscle...then the person DOES have something there and it won't be unhealtht. I'm not a fan of overly muscular women but toned athletic bodies create their own shape through muscle without the need for fat. That said, females by nature are supposed to (and do) have a higher percentage of body fat on average than males.

lol @ this thread. How hair color then goes to fat skinny debate in a few pages....why not hit all the ladies insecurities in the one thread eh? :)

Im blonde, today...but am naturally blonde (exit brain left). :blink:

As for partner hell once over 30 its teeth and hair at all that I'm worried about... :D

and on that note. Brunettes win!

and i need to get a 34 GTR

hear's hoping girls will do this all the time on my r34 gtr :blink: . any girls offering ? lol.

also do you have any of those pics in desktop wallpaper size?

haha if a girl tried to sit on my car, i'd slap her

Especially with that chain thing round her waist! And washing with a sponge :D MICROFIBRE WOMAN!! MICROFIBRE!!!

I'm still at a loss hearing someone say Miranda Kerr is too skinny! Ah well each to their own I'll still be keeping her as my celebrity givin.

Oh but I'd take any of the Victoria Secret models any day of the week! Heidi Klum is still smokin hot and Alessandra Ambrosio :blush:

alessandra-ambrosio.jpgalessandra_ambrosio-4912.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...