Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AHHHHHHHHHHH i think you will find, shell FTG (ferntree-gully) still sells V-power racing, almost certain (:S)

stopped using it 2 months ago, after i retuned baack to 98RON.

not 100% sure its still there, but they were the ONLY ones to have it when i needed it.

indeed because most of the "air" is not oxygen

Octain rating amongst other things is the oxygen content in fuel, the high the oxygen content the more complete the burn

the more complete the burn the more "perfect" the combustion

Theoretical all that will be given off should be h20

Of course this is not possable in real world what i was try to show was

I find it funny that a so called "better" higher quality fuel that will produce a more complete burn would be dis allowed to be used or sold because of tighter controlled emission regulations

unless of course its all a con

indeed because most of the "air" is not oxygen

Octain rating amongst other things is the oxygen content in fuel, the high the oxygen content the more complete the burn

the more complete the burn the more "perfect" the combustion

Theoretical all that will be given off should be h20

Of course this is not possable in real world what i was try to show was

I find it funny that a so called "better" higher quality fuel that will produce a more complete burn would be dis allowed to be used or sold because of tighter controlled emission regulations

unless of course its all a con

Ahhhhhhh, no.

First Octane rating is a number derived from a petrols ability to prevent knock. It has no direct correlation to the fuels formula. Once a fuel is tested it's knock prevention is compared to varying concotions of iso-octane and heptane then given a RON based on what % of iso-octane is required to mimik the fuels knock prevention ability.

Secondly, when you combine a hydroCARBON with oxygen you will get water AND a carbon derivitive, ie. Carbon Monoxide. Always. Without fail. Everytime. It's basic chemistry.

AHHHHHHHHHHH i think you will find, shell FTG (ferntree-gully) still sells V-power racing, almost certain (:S)

stopped using it 2 months ago, after i retuned baack to 98RON.

not 100% sure its still there, but they were the ONLY ones to have it when i needed it.

Um, if that's the case then they are breaking the law because V-Power Racing has not been made for nearly 3 years, and if they still have stock of it in their tanks (highly doubt it) it is going to be that old and very very bad quality fuel with all sorts of nasties in it. They will more than likely have Vpower 98 in there and if it's still selling for 5c per L more than normal Vpower they are false advertising as there is no more VPower Racing. You'll probably find it's the same price as normal VPower and that will be because thats what is being pumped out, they ,ay still have the signs up and the bowser cards in place saying Racing but I can assure you 99% that it's not Racing, the 1% is for the 3 year old stale left over (which again is unlikely because it would destroy your engine and would be taking up tank space that they could use for other fuels)

There's a slight difference in how they refine their fuels. You'll also notice, shells fuel is actually red and BP is actually blue/green. I might be speaking through my ARSE with the colours, but that's what I noticed on my fuel cap after a period of time...

There was some test done somewhere regarding the rating and additives they use, shell came up top.

I love Shell in my car but every bike I've ever owned friggin' hated it.

My NSR seized twice (both times were the only times I ever put Optimax in it...coincidence?), my XR would cough and splutter and also seized although I had run Optimax previously and my blade would cough and fart and carry on until about 7000rpm when it would clear it's throat and go like the clappers.

Conclusion?

Optimax -

Car = yes!

Bike = no!

There's a slight difference in how they refine their fuels. You'll also notice, shells fuel is actually red and BP is actually blue/green. I might be speaking through my ARSE with the colours, but that's what I noticed on my fuel cap after a period of time...

There was some test done somewhere regarding the rating and additives they use, shell came up top.

I could have sworn the colour coding was there for a different reason.

I know leaded race fuels have a red colour and unleaded has blue or something along those lines

Back to back testing resulting in about 3-5 deg of timing retard required across the range from switching from BP ultimate to Shell V-power on my mates race car (SR20 putting out about 240rwkw about 20rwkw drop in power with Shell V-power).

He is now running ultra high octane race fuel now I think about 113ron and picked up another 40rwkw over BP ultimate different days different dynos different tuner.

I could have sworn the colour coding was there for a different reason.

I know leaded race fuels have a red colour and unleaded has blue or something along those lines

fuels are actually clear, they put colouring in them for a safety reason, basically so you don't accidentally drink it lol! I'm pretty much sure the smell would put you off if you tried! unless you live in NT! Oh no I didn't lol

i use to not care when i first got car what i used. as in brand of petrol but after testing different ones out i cannot stand any shell petrol. makes any of my cars ive had run like absolute shit. only and ever use BP Ultimate 98. cars run awesome on it even had 1 car tuned to it as im happy with results

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...