Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Upgraded ID injectors/fuel rail will see upwards of the 550rwkw it's already produced as well, still retaining the standard head...

We are looking forward to what we can get out of it before the new head goes on that's for sure!!

Traction will definitely be an issue for this car but it will be one hell of a lot of fun to drive!! :)

We (Mercury Motorsport) also have almost completed a JUN 2.7 stroker in an RB26 with an HKS T51 SPL turbo (also in a 33 GTST). Will be interesting to compare the two! :D

  • 4 months later...

What rear housing is on the turbo?

Seem turbo is lazy, 35psi is at 7250 rpm looking at the graph. Check just incase your wastegates are leaking, or a boost leak?

if all ok, id be looking for a small rear housing.

hay mate, its how its tuned, he has given me some drivability. there arent any boost leaks and def not going a smaller rear housing. if anything id go a bigger turbo like the GTX45r, it would be perfect! with the 42r i can short change at 6000rpm and it still hard on boost on the gear change so its very generous on its power band. first thing is first and thats to get rid of the borrowed standard head and put my build one back on. maybe look at a 900hp plus with it all on. which is just pointless anyway.

ta for having a think about it though.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

took it for a run before its got the bigger wheels and wider tires and before it gets this head work put in

did a 11.98 @ 138mph

had it on maybe 40% throttle in 1st and 2nd, any more and it spun and axle hopped then flat foot in 3rd and 4th. but its on the limiter over the line in 4th.

did this on 17 inch wheels so the new 19s will have me still changing hard over the line for more mph and the tires a a 3 year old federal 275, there shit. new tires will we be anywhere from a 305 to a 335 just havent brought them yet so cant tell ya.

post-19157-0-97680300-1335961485_thumb.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...

took it for a run before its got the bigger wheels and wider tires and before it gets this head work put in

did a 11.98 @ 138mph

had it on maybe 40% throttle in 1st and 2nd, any more and it spun and axle hopped then flat foot in 3rd and 4th. but its on the limiter over the line in 4th.

did this on 17 inch wheels so the new 19s will have me still changing hard over the line for more mph and the tires a a 3 year old federal 275, there shit. new tires will we be anywhere from a 305 to a 335 just havent brought them yet so cant tell ya.

That is serious rubber.

PM sent.

  • 7 months later...

so how much power rwkw rear will drive can be made wit stock 26 cams - 3l block cam gears and full ported head wit bigger valves , 42r 1.01rear 1000hp

i have pair of timei 260/270 10.25mm lift but if stocks can make over 400rwkw ill keep them in, daily driver vl

gerry

Edited by chairman
  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...